WikiProject Novels	(Rated NA-Class)	NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:NovelsWikiProjectnovel articles
Novels portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.  NA  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

WikiProject Novels
The WikiProject Project page + talk Members talk Guestbook talk Coordinators talk → Current or Recent Elections + talk JobCentre talk Announcements (template) talk Literature Portal talk Article information Resources talk Style guidelines talk → Article (pattern template) talk → Char. Article (pattern template) talk → Book infobox (pattern) talk → Short Story infobox (pattern) talk → NovelSeries infobox (pattern) talk → Character infobox (pattern) talk Current discussions General discussion forum (+) talk Novel categorization talk Work in progress Main work list talk Maintenance lists talk Disputed novel articles talk Disputed book cover images talk Articles needed talk Infobox needed talk Infobox Incomplete talk New articles talk Departments Assessment talk → Assessment Top priority talk Collaboration talk Outreach talk Peer review talk Task forces 19th century task force talk Australian task force talk Chronicles of Narnia task force talk Crime task force talk Fantasy task force talk His Dark Materials task force talk Lemony Snicket task force talk Military fiction task force talk Percy Jackson task force talk Science fiction task force talk Shannara task force talk Short story task force talk Sword of Truth task force talk Twilight task force talk Templates Project banner talk Infobox Book (protected) talk Infobox Short story talk Infobox character talk Infobox Novel series talk Userboxes talk
This box: view • talk • edit • changes

Contents 1 Documentation 2 Discussion 2.1 Continuing from my talk page 2.2 One last newsletter 2.3 Coordinators.

[edit] Documentation

For discussion of the Coordinators list

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Continuing from my talk page

Would this work for a B-class checklist?

           <!-- B-Class checklist -->           <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all            major points out outside of a plot section are appropriately cited. -->           |B-Class-1=           <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and            does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->           |B-Class-2=           <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including            a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->           |B-Class-3=           <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->           |B-Class-4=           <!-- 5. If possible, it contains appropriate supporting materials,            such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->           |B-Class-5=           <!-- Reviews and collaborations -->           |A-Class=           |collaboration-candidate=            |past-collaboration=            |peer-review=            |old-peer-review=  

In other thoughts:

• Should we tag our PR as inactive and just start up an A-class process instead? It would be of greater benefit to the project, IMO, and it should also help editors more. I think that between us two, Liveste, and (maybe) a requirement to make nominators review another A-class nom we should be able to do alright as long as we aren't flooded.
• Should we also tag the newsletter with an inactive tag? This seems like a foregone conclusion...

—Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 09:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Parameters seem good to me. Tag newsletter as inactive seems ok - but with a message that with an editor it can soon be revived. It might encourage someone to volunteer. I'd leave the Peer review for the minute and see how a A-class process went first. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 13:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Alright. I'm just trying to throw ideas out there...maybe that Coords working group is influencing me too much. ;)

What nomenclature should we use? I.e. Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment/ or set up a new Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Review/ ? —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 23:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] One last newsletter

I got one together here, Kevin; please check it out and make whatever changes you deem necessary. —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 23:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

perhaps a bit negative in view - I wouldn't myself have been that down on things. But I don't feel strongly enough about it to make changes. Good for you to put this together. Are you able to send it out? :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I was trying to shock. :) I toned it down a bit; double-check quick? Is there anything big missing? And I'll leave a note on Tucherianbot's talk page after you check it out once more :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok, go for it. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Coordinators.

According to the Coordinators page, the Coordinators term should have been up on March 5, and there should have been another election. The project seems to be declining a bit activity wise, so I think we need to get things going. I'll post a message on the Coordinators talk-pages. Let's see if we can get the Project up and running again. Wikipedia needs it. Alan16 (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)