I'm not sure what people prefer, a header or sidebar for project navigation. Personally I feel the sidebar has a few too many links right now (Portal:Education, Deletion sorting) that could be placed elsewhere in the project, without being necessary parts of "Project navigation", while the header provides simply the navigation around the project itself. On the other hand, the sidebar is able to use the "cute" books icon, which is more of a bonus than I'd like to admit, in my eyes. Mostly I prefer horizontal headers because I feel they "take up less room" and help reduce clutter on the page - but I welcome other opinions on the benefits/drawbacks of both models. You can see both in use at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative education/list for the header and Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative education/Assessment for the sidebar. Can we somehow merge the two? Which style is best from which to build? Other thoughts? Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 17:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I actually like the sidebar on the Project mainpage, but the header on all other parts. The sidebar works well to navigate people from the project mainpage, but has too much information to be used in the assessment department, where a header would be more appropriate. Twenty Years 18:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Who belongs to what?

Well, I guess I came into the discussion awfully late. For The Record, let me state that it seems obvious to me that Homeschooling is a subset of Alternative Education (as are Montessori, full immersion, and several other systems), and that it was kinda silly to propose that Alternative Education be made a subset of Homeschooling. Anyway, I'm here now, but I shouldn't be, I'm actually on a Wikibreak. I will return to see how I can help in about five weeks. Cheers! Unschool (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

It does to most i think. Realistically, homeschooling should up-merge, a project with 70 articles isnt much of a project. Anyway, its really good to see new members. Welcome aboard :) Twenty Years 16:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of homeschooled individuals

List of homeschooled individuals has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of homeschooled individuals (2nd nomination). Five Years 13:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Userbox

I've never done this before, but with the day off work, I've been playing with a lot of things. I've created a userbox for the AltEd project. Frankly, I don't know if there's been any activity here, so I don't expect a lot of takers, but if you want it, here it is: User:Unschool/AltEdUserbox

If I've gone about this and done it the wrong way, please a) forgive me, and b) teach me the right way to do it. I tried to make it look like the others I've seen like at Homeschooling and Higher Education—so that all the ed ones have a similar look and feel, yet also gave it a slight difference in font color to try to stand out. Anyway, there you have it. Unschool (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

For some reason, at least when I look at it, there's a football field worth of space between the userbox and the text below it. I don't see it when I preview, only when I save it. If someone else knows how to correct this, please do so; I'm obviously out of my element. Unschool (talk) 07:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Might be the project header templates at the top or something else random; appears to be functioning fine on user pages anyway. Nice job! Two possible suggestions: adding a black border and adding user pages to Category:WikiProject Alternative Education members

Old: {{Userbox-2 |border-c = #6495ED |border-s = 2 |id1-c = #6495ED |id1-s = 12 |id1-fc = #6495ED |id2-c = #6495ED |id2-s = 16 |id2-fc = #DFFFA5 |info-c = #6495ED |info-s = 8 |info-fc = White |id1 = [[Image:Nuvola apps bookcase.png|44px]] |id2 = AE |info = <center>'''This user is a member of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative Education|<span style="color: #DFFFA5;">WikiProject Alternative Education]]'''</font></center> }} New: {{Userbox-2 |border-c = black |border-s = 1 |id1-c = #6495ED |id1-s = 12 |id1-fc = #6495ED |id2-c = #6495ED |id2-s = 16 |id2-fc = #DFFFA5 |info-c = #6495ED |info-s = 8 |info-fc = White |id1 = [[Image:Nuvola apps bookcase.png|44px]] |id2 = AE |info = <center>'''This user is a member of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative Education|<span style="color: #DFFFA5;">WikiProject Alternative Education]]'''</font></center> }}<includeonly> {{{category|[[Category:WikiProject Alternative Education members|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}} </includeonly>

Best, --Jh12 (talk) 04:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have no idea how to do what you've suggested, either graphically with the userbox, or in terms of the category idea. I'm just not a tech person. The only way I created that userbox was to take another one and change the colors and images. I can't do anything original. Unschool (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Maybe it would be better if I simply made the minor change. Message will be left at User's talk page. --Jh12 (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Alternative education

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7. We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion and school projects

I see I posted this at the wrong wikiproject Deletion of teacher assigned projects Kopachuk Middle School...there has been a reply to whit that the student in order to meet his teacher's pre-requisite had to use user space rather than article space. Why invite teachers and students to learn and write articles on wikipedia if they are deleted? It seems moot. SriMesh | talk 16:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Here is another school project where the teacher has asked the kids to write about local Edmonton bands which got speedy deleted, and the kids are giving up and asking why bother with the teacher's assignment if they won't stay on wikipedia. band article deletion The articles created at this Unannouncedd class project for the most part survived AFD, and they received help from various wikipedians about manual of style to help them through the AFD nominations. SriMesh | talk 23:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject membership - Admins - coordinators

Can this Wikipedia talk:School and university projects talk page project page have membership and admins -perhaps through wikiproject Education or its child projects, Wikipedia:WikiProject Education in Australia, Wikipedia:WikiProject Education in Canada, Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities, Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools, Wikipedia:WikiProject School Years, Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative education, Wikipedia:WikiProject Homeschooling... to help find articles which come onto wikipedia as is commented upon in the deletion section above and get deleted before it is discovered they are part of a class project, so that the teacher/students can be contacted about templates etc. This message also posted at the other wikiprojects as well. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 23:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Found it ....Wikiproject Classroom coordination with coordinators, and instructions for students with contacts. Tis already made. SriMesh | talk 23:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:44, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sudbury Education merger discussions

A heads up, there are currently proposals afoot to merge the Daniel Greenberg and Sudbury school articles (discussion here), as well as merging portions of Sudbury Valley School into Sudbury school (discussion here). The latter seems a reasonable solution to duplication between the two articles, while the former is a proposed solution to claims that Daniel Greenberg is not notable. There is also discussion, though no proposals, to entirely merge Sudbury Valley School and Sudbury school. Nfitz (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Question (sincere, since I really don't know): Is Greenberg notable for anything apart from his Sudbury work. Seems from first glance that, without Sudbury, he wouldn't be notable. Is this correct? Unschool 11:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

• Well that's the debate really. I'd argue that he is notable for his almost 40-years of writing, speaking, etc. on education, as a published author ... and that's what separates him from the philosophy. Nfitz (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
• And now there is a discussion to merge the Sudbury Valley School article (rated high-importance) into the Sudbury school article (which is about the model of education, not a particular school). Discussion is here Nfitz (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)