Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature/Assessment Information & Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature/Assessment Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Lions Club Health Fair - Self-Assessment Booklet - Balance Assessment -...
Lions Club Health Fair - Self-Assessment Booklet - Balance Assessment -...
grassrootsgeriatrics.com
 

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Literature. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles related to literature, including his works and derivitive works. The article ratings are used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPLIT}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Literature articles by quality and Category:Literature articles by importance.

Contents

[edit] Current ratings

Literature
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 2 5 10
Featured list FL 2 2
Good article GA 1 7 2 5 15
B 5 12 9 10 14 50
C 5 4 10 8 10 37
Start 6 15 45 41 53 160
Stub 9 24 72 78 183
List 3 5 9 14 31
Assessed 19 44 104 142 179 488
Unassessed 4 3 647 654
Total 19 48 104 145 826 1142

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Literature WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Where can I find articles to assess? 
Many articles in Category:Literature need to be assessed and any articles in Category:Unassessed Literature articles and Category:Unknown-importance Literature articles.

If you have any other questions that aren't listed here, feel free to ask them at the talk page.

[edit] How to assess articles

You can assess articles by placing the {{WPLIT}} banner on its talk page (not the article page!) and using the two parameters, class (to assess the quality) and importance (to assess the priority).

[edit] Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{Wikiproject Literature}} project banner on its talk page:

{{Wikiproject Literature | ... | class= ??? | ... }}


Featured article FA 
A-Class article A 
Good article GA 
B-Class article B 
C-Class article C 
Start-Class article Start 
Stub-Class article Stub 

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Featured list FL 
List-Class article List 
Disambiguation page Disambig 
Portal.svg Portal 
Project page Project 
Template page Template 
Category page Category 
Media file page Image 
Non-article page NA 
Unrated ??? 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The class parameter should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

[edit] Priority assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPLIT}} project banner on its talk page:

{{Wikiproject Literature| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

[edit] Priority scale

Label Criteria Examples
Top Literature, History of literature
High
Mid
Low

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Requested assessments

  1. Abkhaz literature. Rated start. Has info and 2 sources, but no citations.Yobmod (talk) 09:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  2. Fan fiction Rated B. Lots of info, sourced, well presented and wikified.Yobmod (talk) 09:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  3. Homosexuality in speculative fiction
  4. Samuel Johnson, Christopher Smart and their works Ottava Rima (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
  5. Storytelling--I've rated as start, though I have trimmed the article of essay-like writing. I am more interested in an importance rating. --Call me Bubba (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Hamamatsu Chūnagon Monogatari



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots