Shortcuts: WP:IN1 WP:IN1.0

Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | C-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unknown

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject India! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's India articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WP India}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:India articles by quality and Category:India articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents 1 Frequently asked questions 2 Requesting an assessment 3 Instructions 3.1 Quality scale 3.2 Importance scale 3.3 Importance standards 4 Assessment Team 4.1 New members 5 Example assessments 6 Log 7 See also 8 Workgroup-level statistics

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 

Just add {{WP India}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

How can I get my article rated? 

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles? 

Any member of the India WikiProject is free to add a rating to an article if they wish. However, the Assessment Team (from this department) may overrule the rating of an article if they see fit.

What if I don't agree with a rating given by some other member? 

You can then list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. It is most likely to be assessed by someone from this department.

Aren't the ratings subjective? 

Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

Did the reviewer leave any comments? 

If the reviewer had a left a comment, a link, "(see comments)" will show up on the project banner, that will take you to the sub-page containing the comments.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, you may not receive detailed comments in all instances. If this is the case, you might ask the person who assessed the article if you have any particular questions; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

To what extent will the Assessment Dept. give feedback on an article after grading it? 

If you wish, the Assessment Dept. (for WikiProject India) will keep giving feedback until the Assessment Dept. believes that the article in question is at least; slightly above a "B" grade. After reaching this stage, the Assessment Team are likely to recommend that your article be peer-reviewed.

Why peer-review? How does it work? 

The peer review department conduct a more thorough examination (and review) of articles, and their services are best utilised when the Assessment Dept. believes that the article is ready to be analyzed in "an extremely critical way" (prior to being nominated to a GA, A, or FA status article). Of course, you may submit/nominate an article for review at the peer review department at any time you wish.

How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 

A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the statistics may be more accessible.

How do this all work? 

See Using the bot and WikiProject Council Guide.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. Completed requests are usually placed in the archive .

Please place new requests in the format - # [[article name]] -- ~~~~. New requests may please be added at the bottom of the list. Place requests from here onwards:

1. Daivajna-------Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Banashankari Amma Temple --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Tungnath--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Rudranath--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
5. Madhyamaheshwar--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
6. Kalpeshwar--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Panch Kedar--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
8. Ranni--Mathew Joy 11:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
9. Mizo - Mizoram Tan! (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC) assessed with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
10. Religions of Kerala -- I think this is a very intersting article considering unique mixture of people of different faiths in this state. This article still requires some images and has still incomplete sections. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 06:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC) - Assessed with Comments. Kensplanet^T_C 07:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
11. Pullad - Someone has copied the entire contents of the Kumbanad page to create a Pullad page. Kindly review the Pullad article. It doesnt pertain anything related to Pullad. The person who did this has added just five lines of his own in CAPS and its filled with spelling mistakes and Grammar errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.57.150.68 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC) We can't do much about it; I've AFD'd the article for now. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
12. Princely state--Sharadbob (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC) - Assessed with Comments. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi^talk! 10:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
13. Krishnakumar Kunnath--Anik Ghosh (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
14. Foreign relations of India -- Sainath (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC) - Already B-class, the highest rating as per the department's rating system. Please nominate your article at WP:GAN for a GA rating. Kensplanet^T_C 07:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
15. Vijayawada -- Sainath (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC) - Assessed with Comments. Kensplanet^T_C 07:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
16. Andhra Pradesh -- Sainath (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC) No change; unreferenced tags added. Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
17. Indian Institute of Technology Madras -- Sainath (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Reassessed to C class by Redtigerxyz on 29 August; an involved editor reverted - I've put it back to C-class with comments. Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
18. Kurmi --Edit wiki 114436 (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC) - Assessed with Comments. Kensplanet^T_C 15:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
19. Kumbanad -- 61.246.52.146 (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC) - Assessed with Comments Kensplanet^T_C 07:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
20. Dawoodi Bohra -- Sherenk (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
21. Tri-Series in Sri Lanka in 2009–10 -- Sherenk (talk) 04:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
22. Indian School of Business --Sharadbob (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Sodabottle (talk) 11:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
23. Pathanamthitta District -- Comments for B-Class article addressed. Please check the clean up tag too. Mathew Joy (talk) 10:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
24. VIT University -- Manoj Prajwal (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC) I have moved this article from being a stub to classification C after working on it. I have refined and expanded the article and would greatly appreciate it if a few other editors could give their opinion on it. Th e article is not a finished piece of work as of yet.
25. nettech -- Spurkait (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
26. 2003 Afro-Asian Games -- Ankitbhatt (talk) 08:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC) -- I have been longing for this article to reach B-class. Even if it does not have that many references, the information given should suffice.
27. FIITJEE -- Ankitbhatt (talk) 11:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC) -- Needs rating for quality and importance. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
28. Coat of arms of Sikkim --Sharadbob (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
29. TAPMI-- T.A. Pai Management Institute
30. Duronto Express --Sharadbob (talk) 04:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
31. Fergusson college -- Quite a substantiative article. I've added temporary rating. SPat ^talk 07:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
32. Andhra Pradesh general election, 2009--Sharadbob (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
33. Education in Indore: Anupams123 (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
34. Tourism in Puducherry: Article List tourist spots in Puducherry (India). List includes museums, Heritage buildings,etc . An assessment will be much appriciated.I've added temporary rating. Varun_swm (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2009 (IST) with comments in PR --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
35. V. S. Srinivasa Sastri-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 08:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) w/o comments --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
36. C. P. Ramaswamy Iyer-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 08:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
37. A. Seshayya Sastri-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 03:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC) with comments--Sodabottle (talk) 10:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
38. Vadama-Article has been sufficiently improved and copy-edited-The Enforcer_{Office of the secret service} 08:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
39. Tiruvalla for C Class assignmentAbrahamoommenk (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC) with comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
40. Hereditary Education Policy--Sodabottle (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
41. Pune Cantonment--Nirvanareborn 13:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
42. Kashmir Railway -- SBC-YPR (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
43. Faruqi dynasty - Joy1963 (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC) with comments--Sodabottle (talk) 12:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Sodabottle had given a detailed review, but forgotten to assign a grade. So assigned one on the basis of the review, w/o my comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

my apologies.. i knew i had forgotten to do something..:-)--Sodabottle (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

1. Pune ---------- requesting peer review actually, but page is dysfunctional SPat ^talk 14:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
2. SICSR requesting review of the rating and the removal from stub classafter recent editing. Rated start class with comments--Sodabottle (talk) 14:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WP India}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WP India| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class India articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class India articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class India articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class India articles)
• C (adds articles to Category:C-Class India articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class India articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class India articles)
• NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article India pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class India articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

• Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance India articles)
• High (adds articles to Category:High-importance India articles)
• Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance India articles)
• Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance India articles)

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Please note that the WikiProject India Assessment Department is in the process of updating the grading scheme, so changes may occur to the criteria and examples - the assessment department apologizes for an inconvenience caused, and endeavours to complete this task as soon as possible. Upon completion of updating, the main member of the assessment department will remove this notice.

Class	Criteria	Formal process	Example
FA	Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review.	Featured article candidates	Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists.	Featured list candidates	FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A	Reserved for articles that have received A-class status after review by the assessment department. Such articles are required to be passed as a good article, and are expected to have largely met the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written; however, they may require some further fine-tuning in certain aspects.	Requests for assessment by the department. NOTE: may need to be a former feature article candidate, prior to the department making a decision on whether to grant an article this grade.	Durian (as of March 2007)
GA	Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.	Good article nominations	International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B	Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Satisfies all C-class criteria, but also has a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. At minimum, it should also have some references to reliable sources. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR).	May be assigned by any reviewer	Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
C	The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article must have a defined structure - this includes a lead section, one or more sections of content, as well as a section dedicated to providing references (to sources of information used). The article should be free from major grammatical errors, and should also contain supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.	May be assigned by any reviewer	Perungavur Rajagopalachari (as of January 2009)
Start	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including the following: multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article a particularly useful picture or graphic (optional)	May be assigned by any reviewer	Ramayan (2008 TV series) (as of March 2008)
Stub	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	May be assigned by any reviewer	Example being updated.
List	Should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately organized. May be assigned by any reviewer only for pages that begin with the name "List of" (like in the example). If an article is felt to be an exception to this rule, a request for assessment by the department must be made in order for it to be allowed.	See criteria.	List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of India.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status	Template	Meaning of Status
Top	{{Top-Class}}	This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High	{{High-Class}}	This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid	{{Mid-Class}}	This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low	{{Low-Class}}	This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None	None	This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

[edit] Importance standards

• States - Generally classed as top importance.
• Capital cities - Generally classed as top to high importance.
• National Parks - Generally classed an high to mid importance.
• Cities - Generally classed as mid to low importance.
• Places - Generally classed as mid to low importance.
• Schools - Generally classed as mid to low importance.

[edit] Assessment Team

The list of members below make up the main members of the WikiProject India Assessment team. Members of the team who are bolded (below) are currently active - they are most likely to assess articles, so please direct any enquiries regarding assessment or the assessment department towards them.

1. Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs)
2. GDibyendu (talk · contribs)
3. Mspraveen (talk · contribs)
4. Ncmvocalist (talk · contribs) - currently, main member of assessment team
5. Pruthvi.Vallabh (talk · contribs)
6. Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs)
7. Tinucherian (talk · contribs)

[edit] New members

If you would like to join the assessment team, please add your name below.

1. Daydreamer302000 (talk · contribs) -- I am already a member of the review team and have assessed several articles. I am also on the assessment teams of WikiProject Computer Science and WikiProject Computing.
2. Viddhu (talk · contribs) -- My interests include places (especially in South India), personalities, Indian philosophy & religion.
3. Sodabottle (talk · contribs) -- I would like to join the review team (since i would like to have a number of my contributions reviewed, i would like to "pay it forward" :-)). I have already reviewed a few articles in the assessment requested list without assigning a grade (my bad). My specialities are Indian History, Politics, English Literature, Tamil Literature, Tamil Politics, Elections, and Films.--Sodabottle (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Example assessments

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

• {{WP India|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
• {{WP India|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
• {{WP India|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
• {{WP India|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
• {{WP India|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
• {{WP India|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
• {{WP India}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

Importance

• {{WP India|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
• {{WP India|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
• {{WP India|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
• {{WP India|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

[edit] Log

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here. Unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.

[edit] See also

• Assessment Statistics

[edit] Workgroup-level statistics

Protected areas of India articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 2 B 1 10 7 1 7 26 C 1 1 4 6 Start 3 15 28 55 101 Stub 7 36 20 122 185 Assessed 4 35 72 21 189 321 Unassessed 45 45 Total 4 35 72 21 234 366	Indian states articles Importance Top High Mid None Total Quality FA 4 4 FL 2 2 B 1 25 26 Start 1 1 32 34 Stub 3 3 List 10 10 Assessed 1 1 1 76 79 Unassessed 1 1 Total 1 1 1 77 80
Andhra Pradesh articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 6 6 B 1 5 4 9 19 C 1 1 5 7 Start 2 13 36 13 121 185 Stub 2 14 89 97 1756 1958 List 11 11 Assessed 5 33 129 111 1909 2187 Unassessed 63 63 Total 5 33 129 111 1972 2250	Goa articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 1 1 5 7 C 3 3 Start 5 3 16 2 36 62 Stub 2 5 37 24 126 194 List 1 5 6 Assessed 7 9 54 27 176 273 Unassessed 73 73 Total 7 9 54 27 249 346
Gujarat articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 2 GA 1 1 B 1 1 2 3 7 Start 1 6 11 6 38 62 Stub 7 50 25 471 553 List 1 5 6 Assessed 3 14 63 31 520 631 Unassessed 18 18 Total 3 14 63 31 538 649	Himachal Pradesh articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 B 4 2 1 7 C 1 1 Start 4 13 31 18 66 Stub 3 48 33 133 217 List 1 1 2 4 Assessed 9 20 80 33 155 297 Total 9 20 80 33 155 297
Karnataka articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 6 1 9 18 GA 1 1 2 B 3 5 6 48 62 C 2 7 4 15 28 Start 8 29 70 20 497 624 Stub 9 82 55 2729 2875 List 2 29 31 Assessed 13 51 166 82 3328 3640 Total 13 51 166 82 3328 3640	Kerala articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 2 3 A 2 2 GA 1 2 3 B 6 12 10 1 35 64 C 1 3 5 1 7 17 Start 7 82 95 76 332 592 Stub 1 28 125 379 2969 3502 List 1 4 5 21 31 Assessed 16 128 241 463 3366 4214 Total 16 128 241 463 3366 4214
Maharashtra articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 2 FL 1 1 2 GA 1 2 7 1 2 13 B 4 6 10 5 34 59 C 3 2 6 11 22 Start 3 12 86 192 352 645 Stub 3 16 125 264 1541 1949 List 1 2 2 4 27 36 Assessed 12 43 232 473 1968 2728 Unassessed 1 287 288 Total 12 44 232 473 2255 3016	Punjab articles Importance Top Mid Low None Total Quality B 3 3 Start 1 1 2 Stub 3 1 4 Assessed 3 1 4 1 9 Unassessed 1 6 7 Total 3 2 4 7 16
Uttarakhand articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 3 3 6 C 4 4 Start 3 13 24 29 69 Stub 5 50 30 96 181 List 1 1 Assessed 6 18 74 30 134 262 Unassessed 55 55 Total 6 18 74 30 189 317	Tamil Nadu articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 5 5 FL 1 1 GA 2 1 13 16 B 2 8 7 96 113 C 1 5 1 27 34 Start 1 19 77 27 761 885 Stub 1 20 157 237 3045 3460 List 2 3 1 94 100 Assessed 6 51 249 266 4042 4614 Unassessed 1232 1232 Total 6 51 249 266 5274 5846
West Bengal articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 1 3 6 FL 1 1 GA 1 1 3 5 B 4 12 7 1 13 37 C 6 8 2 16 Start 2 61 258 73 99 493 Stub 2 6 138 267 393 806 List 1 1 6 8 Assessed 12 88 412 341 519 1372 Unassessed 60 117 177 Total 12 88 472 341 636 1549	Indian cities articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 2 7 10 FL 1 1 2 A 1 1 GA 1 1 2 B 2 15 18 1 32 68 C 3 5 4 8 20 Start 3 29 343 243 187 805 Stub 3 163 822 956 1944 List 1 5 6 Assessed 9 52 530 1070 1197 2858 Unassessed 59 59 Total 9 52 530 1070 1256 2917

Chennai articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 1 GA 1 1 2 B 2 1 12 15 C 1 2 3 Start 4 10 9 2 97 122 Stub 6 26 30 7 228 297 List 1 2 4 7 Assessed 15 38 41 10 343 447 Unassessed 14 14 Total 15 38 41 10 357 461

Mumbai articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FL 1 1 GA 2 2 2 1 7 B 5 7 6 9 1 28 C 2 1 5 1 3 12 Start 30 62 61 75 14 242 Stub 7 23 98 124 26 278 List 2 2 1 2 7 Assessed 46 97 175 211 46 575 Unassessed 4 4 Total 46 97 175 211 50 579

Indian politics articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 2 3 FL 3 3 GA 1 4 5 B 4 5 8 1 79 97 C 9 3 4 1 23 40 Start 28 36 62 23 382 531 Stub 56 42 605 260 2087 3050 List 2 4 10 1 68 85 Assessed 100 90 689 287 2648 3814 Unassessed 492 492 Total 100 90 689 287 3140 4306

Indian districts articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FL 1 1 GA 1 1 B 4 1 1 10 16 C 2 2 Start 1 16 12 2 69 100 Stub 11 37 5 466 519 List 16 1 1 18 Assessed 22 29 50 7 549 657 Unassessed 23 23 Total 22 29 50 7 572 680

Indian history articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 6 1 2 11 20 FL 1 1 GA 1 1 2 8 12 B 5 16 15 5 136 177 C 2 6 5 41 54 Start 1 32 102 65 635 835 Stub 23 75 108 1189 1395 List 8 3 13 24 Assessed 6 80 208 190 2034 2518 Unassessed 1 339 340 Total 6 81 208 190 2373 2858

Indian military history articles Importance None Total Quality FA 4 4 A 2 2 GA 5 5 B 86 86 Start 696 696 Stub 860 860 Assessed 1653 1653 Total 1653 1653

Indian cinema articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 1 3 A 1 1 GA 1 2 1 1 13 18 B 1 10 1 39 51 C 1 3 17 21 Start 21 44 12 1036 1113 Stub 1 23 76 91 5355 5546 List 1 8 13 616 638 Assessed 3 61 134 117 7076 7391 Unassessed 1 2 1353 1356 Total 3 61 135 119 8429 8747	Indian television articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 1 B 1 1 7 9 C 2 2 Start 3 17 29 15 90 154 Stub 8 34 43 65 364 514 List 12 12 Assessed 12 52 72 80 476 692 Unassessed 277 277 Total 12 52 72 80 753 969
Indian literature articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 3 3 GA 1 1 B 1 4 3 1 9 18 C 2 1 1 4 Start 4 20 53 14 108 199 Stub 1 7 61 61 231 361 List 3 3 Assessed 6 37 118 76 352 589 Unassessed 1 6 7 Total 6 37 118 77 358 596	Classical Tamil articles Importance High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 2 C 1 1 Start 1 2 4 7 Stub 2 2 1 3 8 List 1 1 Assessed 3 4 1 11 19 Total 3 4 1 11 19
Indian music articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 1 2 1 4 B 1 4 5 10 C 3 6 3 2 15 29 Start 12 64 89 23 201 389 Stub 35 96 9 683 823 List 7 2 5 14 Assessed 17 118 190 34 910 1269 Unassessed 257 257 Total 17 118 190 34 1167 1526

Indian Christianity work group articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality GA 2 1 2 5 B 8 2 6 5 1 22 C 4 2 1 7 Start 24 7 17 28 119 195 Stub 4 9 81 156 250 List 2 6 4 12 Assessed 44 11 40 120 276 491 Unassessed 2 2 Total 44 11 40 120 278 493