Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education Information & Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Patient Education / Health Education
Patient Education / Health Education
tmci.org
 Tubal Reversal Information on Wikipedia
Tubal Reversal Information on Wikipedia
tubal-reversal.net
 Doctor Eugene Lipov, M.D. - Biography and Wikipedia Entry
Doctor Eugene Lipov, M.D. - Biography and Wikipedia Entry
eugenelipovmd.org
 Keeping Wikipedia Spick and Span
Keeping Wikipedia Spick and Span
fightaging.org
 

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Education. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting.

Anyone can help maintain the list on this page:

  • To add a new AfD discussion (once it has already been opened on WP:AFD):
  • Look through the list of current discussions to find items related to this subject area.
  • Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  • You can also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Education}}<small>—~~~~</small> to it, which will inform users that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
  • There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
  • Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
  • You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Education.

Please note that adding an AfD to, or removing it from, this page does not add it to, or remove it from, the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page, before adding it to this page.

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archive Relevant archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education/archive.
Purge page cache Watch this page

See also:

Contents

[edit] Education

[edit] University College Dublin Law Society

University College Dublin Law Society (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: "University College Dublin Law Society"search, news, books, scholar, images )

Recreation of previously previously deleted student society which still fails WP:N and still smacks of WP:PROMOTION. Still a lack of reliable refs also. Delete Féasógach (talk) 11:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Mm40 (talk) 12:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Mm40 (talk) 12:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - the editors don't help themselves by including unsourced puffery (I've cleaned out the worst) and trivia. However, this society does get regular press mentions and is just worth keeping. TerriersFan (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. TerriersFan (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • keep This article deserves a space just like any other article! down with fascist wikipedia! keep wikipedia a free encyclopedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uni4life (talkcontribs) 15:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The fallaciousness of such arguments as this is discussed at Wikipedia:Pokémon test. --Bejnar (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. (Shame about the above comment, but anyway). I guess this society is similar to the Oxford and Cambridge unions, but with a bit less history behind it. It appears that it has received some coverage, and had notable speakers participating in debates. Is it a potentially useful encyclopaedic topic? I think so. Quantpole (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per discussion above, but it needs a lot of format repair: citations don't seem to be how they should be. Can this be fixed? Bearian (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral This is full of puffery. The Law Society is a student society of the University College Dublin Law School, on which we don't even have an article. "Established in 1911", well yes, there will have been a student law society for as long as there's been a faculty of law there - big deal. "4,500 members"? - well, since the source is a deadlink that's unverifiable - but many student societies have inflated numbers by counting every enrolled student within certain classes as a "member" of the appropriate society - even if they never attend. I was a member of several. Some famous speakers? Big deal. I'll bet Mary McAleese also speaks to church groups too occasionally. The question is, were these significant and highly reported speeches - or just stump speeches from politicians doing the rounds? Show me some media reporting and not just the inevitable press release. "Mooting" competitions? All Law faculties do those. Illustrious honorary members? Do they do significant things, or is this just a nod to alumni of the faculty? We need some verifiable sign of notability here. I could be convinced to keep this - but the keep voters need to do some work to verify something from independent 3rd party sources.--Scott Mac (Doc) 17:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep I think this is an exception to the general rule about student societies. (I say this although I have almost always !voted delete for them). It has a major role in an important university. DGG ( talk ) 17:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - non notable student society. Snappy (talk) 23:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete None of the "keeps" above seem to address the lack of notability. At best this society deserves a line or at most two in the article about the University College Dublin. It does not appear to be independently notable. DGG says it has a major role at the University College Dublin, but the sources do not support that statement. While it is very true that a number of notable people have appeared at their functions, that in an of its self does not make it a notable student society. Note that the "media coverage" is The University Observer which is a student newspaper distributed throughout campus of University College Dublin fortnightly. There is no significant independent media coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I should note that "press mentions" and "significant coverage" are not the same thing. Please read the notability guidelines and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep This society hosted an event this year, spoken at by 8 mainstream Irish politicians including an ex Prime Minister, attended by a capacity crowd of 1500 as well as press from the Irish Times, Evening Herald and RTE. I realise most of the debate on this society is not by Irish people, and maybe you don't understand the importance of people involved to the nation of Ireland. But this society does play a significant role on the central stage. I'll search for more sources, however I do know a history is currently being compiled by a third party. As for the above comment, I'd note that 2 of the sources on the page are the Irish Times and Evening Herald, which are mainstream press, the Mao article which is referenced from the UCD home page can be found also in the IrishTimes by simply putting in an IrishTimes search for UCD Lawsoc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.232.72.7 (talk) 03:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. Important role? How exactly? What official role does it play in the University? Yes it may host an important talk once or twice a year but I don't think that it warrants it's own article.109.78.180.163 (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] English for Integrated Studies Project

English for Integrated Studies Project (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: "English for Integrated Studies Project"search, news, books, scholar, images )

This article appears to fall under WP:SOAP and WP:NOR, as the author appears to be the creator of the project itself and the references section cites only the author's own unpublished documents. Simple Google searches for the subject reveal no significant third-party results. Although a commendable effort, I don't think the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia is warranted. Paul_012 (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Education Proposed deletions

Check WP:PRODSUM for articles proposed for deletion.




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots