WikiProject Comics v • d • e
Home	Assessments	Discussion	Clean-up	Workgroups	Improvements	Notice board	Popular pages
Getting Involved · Statistics · Article Alerts · Style guidance · Copyright and comics articles · Naming conventions · References and reliable sources · Comics related templates · Userbox

Shortcut: WP:CMC/CLASS

Quality: FA-Class | FL-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | C-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | List-Class | Unassessed

Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Bottom | Unknown

Welcome to the wonderful assessment department of WikiProject Comics! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Comics articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{Comicsproj}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Comics articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents 1 Frequently asked questions 2 Instructions 2.1 Quality scale 2.2 Importance scale 3 Requesting an assessment 3.1 Incorrectly assessed pages 4 Participants 4.1 Active 4.2 Inactive 5 Log 6 Example assessments

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How do I add an article to the WikiProject? 

Just add {{Comicsproj}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

How can I get my article rated? 

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles? 

Any editor is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Please add your name to the list of participants if you wish to assess articles on a regular basis.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

Where can I get more comments about my article? 

The peer review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there.

What if I don't agree with a rating? 

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective? 

Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

How can I keep track of changes in article ratings? 

A full log of changes over the past thirty days is available here. If you are just looking for an overview, however, the statistics may be more accessible.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{Comicsproj}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WP Comics| class=??? }}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Comics articles)
• FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Comics articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Comics articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Comics articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Comics articles)
• C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Comics articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Comics articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Comics articles)
• List (adds lists to Category:List-Class Comics articles)
• Cat (adds categories to Category:Category-Class Comics articles)
• Template (adds templates to Category:WikiProject Comics templates)
• Disambig (adds disambiguation pages to Category:Disambig-Class Comics articles)
• Redirect (adds redirects to Category:Redirect-Class Comics articles)
• Portal (adds redirects to Category:Portal-Class Comics articles)
• Image (adds redirects to Category:Image-Class Comics articles)
• NA (for other pages, such as WikiProject pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Comics articles)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class Comics articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

{{WP Comics| importance=??? }}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

• Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Comics articles)
• High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Comics articles)
• Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Comics articles)
• Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Comics articles)
• Bottom (adds articles to Category:Bottom-importance Comics articles)
• No For redirects and disambiguation pages (adds to Category:No-importance Comics articles)
• NA For templates, category, project and portal pages (adds to Category:NA-importance Comics articles)

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

WikiProject Comics article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]

Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Article has obtained "Featured article" status. More detailed criteria The article must meet the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is— (a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; (b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; (c) well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature on the topic. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported with citations; this requires a "References" section that lists these sources, complemented by inline citations where appropriate; (d) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and (e) stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of— (a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; (b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents; and (c) consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended. Images. It has images that follow the image use policy and other media where appropriate, with succinct captions, brief and useful alt text when feasible, and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Superman (as of October 2009)
FL {{FL-Class}}	Article has "Featured lists" status. More detailed criteria The article must meet the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; it is not a content fork, does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate through and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and it has a minimal proportion of red links. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions and alternative (alt) text if necessary. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.			List of Smallville episodes (as of October 2009)
A {{A-Class}}	The article is well organized and is essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere, as described here. More detailed criteria Shortcuts: WP:ACLASS WP:A? Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Films).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to "tweak" the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.	Batman (1989 film) (as of October 2009)
GA {{GA-Class}}	Article has obtained Good article status. More detailed criteria The article must meet the good article criteria: Well-written: (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation. Factually accurate and verifiable: (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research. Broad in its coverage: (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by images: (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Alex Raymond (as of October 2009)
B {{B-Class}}	The article is mostly complete, without major issues, but requires some further work to reach Good Article standards. B-Class articles should meet the five B-Class criteria: More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.	No reader should be left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style.	Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) (as of October 2009)
C {{C-Class}}	The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than "Start"-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or trivia. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.	2000 AD (comics) (as of October 2009)
Start {{Start-Class}}	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content, but it is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.	Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.	Acme Novelty Library (as of October 2009)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	A very basic description of the topic. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	Action Girl Comics (as of October 2009)
List {{List-Class}}	Meets the criteria of a Stand-alone List, which is a page that contains primarily a list.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of comic books (as of October 2009)
Redirect {{Redirect-Class}}	Any redirect in the article namespace.	A redirect takes reader to another article relevant to the article they wanted.	Ensure article is still redirect, otherwise re-assess.	Martha Kent (as of October 2009)
Disambig {{Disambig-Class}}	Is any disambiguation page.	Serves to distinguish article titles that occur when a single term can be associated with more than one topic.	Pay particular attention to the proper naming of disambiguation articles, they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title.	America's Best Comics (disambiguation) (as of October 2009)
Category {{Cat-Class}}	Is any category.	Categories (along with other features like cross-references, lists, and infoboxes) help users find information, even if they don't know that it exists or what it's called.	Be aware not to over-categorise and to be careful of maintaining a neutral point of view when creating or filling categories. Make decisions about the structure of categories and subcategories that make it easy for users to browse through similar articles.	Category:Comics stubs
Template {{Template-Class}}	Is any type of template. The most common types of template used in the WikiProject are infoboxes and navboxes.	Serves different purposes depending upon the type of template. Infoboxes go at the upper right of a page and are a way of providing easy access to important pieces of introductory infomation about the subject. Navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page, and are for the purpose of uniting a group of related articles into an easily accessible format for inclusion on every page listed in the navbox.	Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.	Template:Comicsproj
Portal {{Portal-Class}}	Is any page in the portal namespace.	Portals are useful entry-points to Wikipedia content.	Editors need to ensure the portal is kept updated and displays properly, updating news sections and looking out for red links.	Portal:Comics
File {{Image-Class}}	Tagged page is an image.	Images are used to help explain articles by providing examples of style, lay-out, logo, or other typical visual aspects. Most comics images are fair use and should be used sparingly. Public domain or Creative Commons / GFDL licensed images can be used more freely.	Editors need to ensure that images have correct licenses, fair use rationales (where applicable), and are only used in articles for which they have such rationale. Fair use images should not be used as pure decoration.	Image:John Byrne.JPG
NA {{NA-Class}}	Is not an article, and fits no other classification.	Probably not useful to any casual reader, these are typically only WikiProject pages.	Look out for mis-classified articles. Currently many NA-class articles need to be re-classified.	Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Templates

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Comics.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status	Template	Meaning of Status
Top	{{Top-Class}}	This article is of the utmost importance to the project, as it provides key information about a major topic that is fundamental to a study of the subject.
High	{{High-Class}}	This article is very important to the project, as it covers either a general area of knowledge or provides information about a significant topic.
Mid	{{Mid-Class}}	This article is relatively important to the project, as it provides more specific knowledge of areas that a serious reader would need to understand.
Low	{{Low-Class}}	This article is significant but has limited importance to the project, as it expands the reader's overall knowledge of the subject into areas of general interest.
Bottom	{{Bottom-Class}}	This article has no real significance to the project, but it covers additional topics of general or specific interest, some of which could be described as trivia, though all are notable in their own right. Others may be articles of high importance to another project that have an indirect connection with comics. The category was created by the WikiProject to counter-balance "top importance" and to place "mid-importance" into the actual middle. In addition it serves to separate trivia from articles of low but significant importance.
No	{{No-Class}}	Subject is a disambiguation or redirect page, residing in article space but redundant in a print encyclopedia.
NA	{{NA-Class}}	Used for categories, templates, portal and project pages, separate from article space.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. To discuss the ratings methods or raise issues with similar articles rated differently, please use the talk page. NOTE: This is only to rate the article on quality - you may or may not get feedback on the article. If you desire a review, use the WP:COMICS peer review process or the regular peer review process. If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> and note your rating here so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Thanks!

Seeking an A-class rating? We suggest you submit it for a Peer Review to allow us more time to respond and review. Be sure to first read what qualifies as an A rating before doing so though.

Past assessments are located here. If you delete a striked-through article from the list, please remember to put it in the archive.

Add new requests at the bottom.

1. Numerous Marvel Comics articles. BOZ (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Batmobile - Requesting assessment. Much work has been done on it recently and I'm looking for ways it can be improved. A gx7 (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Joker (comics) - it was a B-class article that's been rated as C-class, and I'd like to know how we can improve it so it's better. The Joker's Woman^{[BlackPearl14•contribs!]}
4. Liam Sharp Just noticed the article is 'C' class, and low. There's a been a ton of work done on it, so just wondered if we could get the re-evaluated? I can verify it's 100% accurate! :) Best, Liam.
5. LGBT themes in comics. I'm gradually working this up to GA, and have completely rewritten it and added 50 sources. An outside oppinion on whether it meets B class yet would be nice (and any comments on what is missing for GA?). Thanks!YobMod 09:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
6. Typhoon (comics)-I've added numerous references to the article and I'm wondering if it would be deemed as better than start-class now. Thanks! OPMaster (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
7. Anole (comics) - Rquesting reassessment. I followed all listed suggestions from the B-Class grading, standardizing all references to Wiki: Citation templates, expanding the lead, condensing sections into notable character development points, and adding further real world analysis and impact with third party sources. Hoping to work this up to a GA and eventually an FA. Thanks!Luminum (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
8. X-Men Origins: Wolverine - Not fully-comics, I know. Rated C-Class, plenty of referenced content. Worthy of a B, and some input on what needs improvement would be nice. igordebraga ≠ 02:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
9. Star Sapphire (comics) - It's been rated at C class, but I've made a number of significant changes to it. I've corrected grammar, added citations, and done a lot of general clean up. I tried to get a peer review, but no one has responded. So I figured I'd just jump to this. Hooliganb (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
10. The Doomsday Scenario - It's been rated Start class, but I suggest it's clearly better than that. It meets the B class checklist criteria, so I think it ought to be B or at least C class, looking at the table above. I can't re-rate it myself because I'm biased, since I wrote most of it. Richard75 (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
11. Nightwing - I don't think this is start class anymore. Seeking C-class. 119.11.0.224 (talk) 04:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
12. Erfworld - I've streamlined this long and tangled page into something more like an article. Seeking C-class instead of start class. 119.11.0.224 (User:npatchett)
13. Noel Van Horn - Currently stub-class. Was originally only a few sentences, I expanded and sourced the article. --Grandy02 (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
14. Flemming Andersen - Same as Noel Van Horn. --Grandy02 (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
15. Eega Beeva - I rearranged, expanded and sourced the article (one citation is still needed, though). Tone should also be appropriate now. --Grandy02 (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
16. Mechanismo - I have added references, so it now meets all criteria in the B-Class checklist. Richard75 (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
17. Chief Judge Fargo - added refs, hoping for B-Class. Richard75 (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
18. Constantine (film): Previously rated as start class. I've been working immensely to improve the quality of this article. I request for a review as to the current class on the quality scale. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 19:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
19. Lucky Luke - Major change in layout and section additions Kasaalan (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
20. Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) - Since this was last rated (as B-class) I have added more references and more info about what the creators said about it in secondary sources. Hoping to move up. (See here for original assessment.) Richard75 (talk) 18:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Update: This has been rated as a Good Article; trying to get up to A-Class if possible. Peer review request here. Richard75 (talk) 18:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
21. Gladiator - I think this should certainly now be deserving of B-class status, at the very least. Homoaffectional (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Updated. Joined the team; reassessed myself. Consider this matter closed. Homoaffectional (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
22. Stumptown (comics) - Requesting assessment Chromatikoma (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
23. Acme Novelty Library - Would love to see this move from Start class. Jnthn0898 (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
24. Bizenghast - Last rated as C-class, but a lot of work (and sources) has been put in since then. Kaguya-chan (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
25. Barry_Windsor-Smith I'd appreciate a critique of a number of pages I've done recently, for potential upgrading (of course) and good pointers for future contributions. Hoping to upgrade a significant number of existing pages in 2010, and add more. This would help immensely. Thanks - note: the next entries also link Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
26. Dominic_Fortune ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
27. Rex_the_Wonder_Dog ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
28. Ace_Comics ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
29. Alan_Class_Comics_(publishers) new page - as complete as I can get it!

[edit] Incorrectly assessed pages

Category:Incorrectly tagged WikiProject Comics articles and Category:Incorrectly tagged WikiProject Comics articles list pages which have been incorrectly assessed. Reasons for this include:

• Invoked review parameter when the associated subpage doesn't exist, or missing review parameter it when it does
• Invalid combination of review status and assessment class
• Link to a portal subpage that doesn't exist
• Use of a deprecated parameter (e.g. portal)
• Assessed as NA-importance when the page is in the article namespace
  • Disambig and Redirect articles should be rated as No for importance
• Assessed as No-importance when the page is not in the article namespace
  • Templates, Categories, Images and Portals should be rated as NA for importance
• Assessed as having an importance when the page is not in the article namespace
• Use of a deprecated parameter (e.g. image)
  • Future class has been deprecated

[edit] Participants

[edit] Active

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

1. Businessman332211 (talk · contribs)
2. Fram (talk · contribs)
3. Goldenboy (talk · contribs)
4. Hiding (talk · contribs)
5. Emperor (talk · contribs) special interests: British comics as well as US work by British comics creators. Will do B-class assessments on request
6. Homoaffectional (talk · contribs) special interests: obsecure & recurring characters, LGBT characters in comics

[edit] Inactive

1. Rick Norwood (talk · contribs) special interests: comic strips, silver age
2. Maple_Leaf (talk · contribs)
3. Mrph (talk · contribs)
4. Psyphics (talk · contribs)
5. ChrisGriswold (talk · contribs)
6. Mike1 (talk · contribs)
7. Exvicious (talk · contribs)
8. Herve661 (talk · contribs) I have good knowledge on Disney comics and could give a help there

[edit] Log

The log has now grown too large to transclude. Please see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Comics articles by quality log for full details.

[edit] Example assessments

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

• {{Comicsproj|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=FL}} - to rate a list at FL-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=C}} - to rate an article at C-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=list}} - to rate an article at List-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=redirect}} - to rate an article at Redirect-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=cat}} - to rate an article at Cat-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=template}} - to rate an article at Template-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=disambig}} - to rate an article at Disambig-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=portal}} - to rate an article at Portal-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=image}} - to rate an article at Image-Class
• {{Comicsproj|class=NA}} - to rate an article at NA-Class
• {{Comicsproj}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

Importance

• {{Comicsproj|importance=top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=high}} - to rate an article at High importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=low}} - to rate an article at Low importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=bottom}} - to rate an article at Bottom importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=no}} - to rate an article at No importance
• {{Comicsproj|importance=na}} - to rate an article at NA importance