Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria Information & Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Dental Team Assessment - Hiring & Team Development
Dental Team Assessment - Hiring & Team Development
dentalteamsystem.com
 Atlas of Appendix Cancer - Clinical Assessment Criteria
Atlas of Appendix Cancer - Clinical Assessment Criteria
surgicaloncology.com
 Bibliography of Criteria , Guidelines, and Health Status Assessments Used...
Bibliography of Criteria, Guidelines, and Health Status Assessments Used...
rheum.org
 Restructuring - Appendix E -- Evaluation of the Options using the...
Restructuring - Appendix E -- Evaluation of the Options using the...
sjhc.london.on.ca
 
Shortcuts:
WP:WIABCA
WP:BCLASS
WP:1.0/B
B-Class article B 
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
    It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
    It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure.
    Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written.
    The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
    Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way.
    It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots