| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Dental Team Assessment - Hiring & Team Development dentalteamsystem.com | of Age: ALS Journal Appoints New Editorial Team... als.ca | Atlas of Appendix Cancer - Clinical Assessment Criteria surgicaloncology.com | Bibliography of Criteria, Guidelines, and Health Status Assessments Used... rheumatology.org |
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Films). An A-Class article should approach the standards for a Featured article (FA), but will typically fall short because of minor style issues. The article may need minor copyedits, but it should be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and reasonably well-written. A peer review should make the article a viable candidate for FA. Assessing an article as A-Class requires more than one reviewer. There are two basic methods available for doing this. [edit] Basic methodFor WikiProjects without a formal A-Class review process, the proposal to promote to A-Class should be made on the article's talk page and supported there by two uninvolved editors, with no significant opposes. The review should also be noted on the discussion page. [edit] Formal WikiProject reviewA more formal review may be useful for some WikiProjects, such as the method used successfully at the Military History project. The method is summarized below:
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |