| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
The Center for Peer Review Justice- seeks to correct the inequities in... peerreview.org | Caritas Home Care - Get Active—and Back in the Game—with Video Games caritashomecare.org | St. Elizabeth's Medical Center - Get Active—and Back in the... caritasstelizabeths.org |
[edit] Infamous (video game)This peer review discussion has been closed. Thanks, MASEM (t) 06:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Ruhrfisch comments: I have not heard of this game before and do not write video / computer game articles. The content seems fine, but I agree the prose could use somework, and there are a few other MOS issues. Here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC) I made some copyedits to the first two sections to try and make the prose a bit smoother - please revert if I introduced errors or made things worse. Sorry I do not have time for more, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Comments The plot, gameplay and development sections seem long, the development section in particular. Though they are sourced, consider that the reader may become bored. Trimming is definitely needed in the development section. --Teancum (talk) 23:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC) |
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |