| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
"WP:NCB" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia is not a crystal ball (WP:CBALL).
This is a naming conventions guideline for the naming of Wikipedia articles about books, which includes printed books and e-books. In general, use the title of the work as the article's title, following all applicable general conventions. To disambiguate, add the type of literary work in parentheses, such as "(novel)", "(novella)", "(short story)", etc. You may use "(book)" to disambiguate a non-fiction book. If further disambiguation is needed, add the author's surname inside the parentheses: "(Orwell novel)", "(Asimov short story)", etc.
[edit] Scope and definitions[edit] ManuscriptsMain article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (manuscript names) Although, for example, the Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry is at the same time a manuscript and a book, for such items it is the "manuscript names" naming conventions guideline that deals with article naming. By contrast Les très riches heures du Duc de Berry, published in 1984, ISBN 3-85672-025-1, a two volume facsimile + commentaries edition of the "Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry" manuscript, is a book in the meaning of the present guideline. Some examples from Antiquity clarifying the difference between books and manuscripts (in these examples the "manuscripts" are carved in stone):
[edit] Ancient use of the term "book"From antiquity to the early modern age it was not uncommon to divide a single writing in separate "books", where a more modern author would call such subdivisions "parts" or even "chapters", for example Caesar's De Bello Gallico contains eight "books", somewhat of "chapter" length when comparing to more modern writings. For the use of this guideline, "book" stands for the entire work, and not for subparts that have no other original title than "Book <number>". [edit] SeriesSometimes books are collected into a larger entity, for example a "trilogy", or another type of series. Whether Wikipedia treats the individual books on separate pages, or the whole collection of such serialized books on a single page, depends from case to case. In general, however, the "series" page is created first, spinning off pages on individual books only if necessary. Examples: Oresteia - The Forsyte Saga - Les Rougon-Macquart - In Search of Lost Time - ...For Dummies - Aubrey–Maturin series [edit] ComicsMain article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) See the "comics" Naming Conventions guideline for comics and graphic novels. [edit] PeriodicalsThis guideline does not contain specific information on how to name Wikipedia articles on periodicals (magazines, newspapers,...). In most cases naming such articles will not be problematic, nor incompatible with this guideline, except that for periodicals that have no specific English edition, the title is usually not translated (example: Pravda, not The Truth). Examples: Reader's Digest - Nature (journal) - The Lancet - The Times - The New York Times - Acta Diurna - Vogue (magazine) - Spirou (magazine) [edit] Poems and lyricsPoems normally follow this present Naming conventions guideline on books, e.g. The Lady of the Lake, for the Walter Scott poem. Articles on the text used for musical compositions (aka "lyrics", "libretto",...) are usually not separated from the articles on those musical compositions, and follow the naming conventions for such types of works, e.g.:
...unless the text started to live a life on its own, like the L'Olimpiade libretto - which is an article about a book in the sense of this guideline. [edit] Title translationsMain article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) Should a book title, of a book originally written in a foreign language, be translated into English? If the original language does not use the Latin alphabet, the title is normally translated. Preferably in English, example: "Οἰδίπους Τύραννος" → Oedipus the King (not "Oedipus Rex", which is the Latin translation). However, in some cases, when a transcription or transliteration of a title originally not in Latin alphabet, is better known, and/or less ambiguous, that version of the title can be used, example: Tao Te Ching (though in this case the situation is further muddied by the choice between Wade-Giles and pinyin Chinese language romanizations). If the book is best known by an English title, use that version of the title. Also books that haven't been published in English (yet) are preferably referred to by an English version of the title, if the title in the original language would not easily be recognised by the majority of English speakers, for instance (from José Saramago#Bibliography): Lucidity (a translation of the title for example used on this page in 2004), and not Ensaio sobre a Lucidez. Some time later the publication of the English translation of the book was announced [1], causing the link in the author's article to be changed to Seeing [2]. [edit] When the title version "best known in English" can't be determinedFor some books it cannot be determined, not even by educated guesswork, which version of the title is the most common. For these books, try to determine which of the widely spread versions of the book in the English-speaking world was the most authoritative original (that is, the version that contributed most to the book's becoming known in the English-speaking world), and stick to the title as it appeared on that edition. Example: Oscar Wilde's play Salomé/Salome was first written in French (title: Salomé), but the first printed edition in English, of which the translation was supervised by the author, was Salome. Notwithstanding that later English editions variously had either Salomé or Salome on the title page, the Wikipedia article is at Salome (play). [edit] SubtitlesUsually, a Wikipedia article on a book does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name. The only exception to that is short titles, for disambiguation purposes, examples:
Except for the extremely long ones, best to provide redirects from the title including the subtitle. Standard separator for the title and the subtitle (that is, in cases where both taken together don't constitute a continuing phrase) in the page name is a colon followed by a space, as in the first example above. [edit] Standard disambiguationMain article: Wikipedia:Disambiguation To disambiguate, add the type of literary work in parentheses, such as "(novel)", "(novella)", "(short story)", "(dialogue)", "(essay)", "(play)", etc. If none of these specific qualifiers applies, also "(book)" can be used. Note however that this qualifier would usually be perceived as indicating a non-fiction type of writing. If further disambiguation is needed, add the author's surname in parentheses: "(Orwell novel)", "(Asimov short story)", etc. In this case it is not advised to leave out the qualifier of which type of book it is, unless completely redundant, which may happen for some non-fiction books like the Russell and Rousseau examples in the previous section, or Histories (Herodotus)/Histories (Tacitus). [edit] CapitalizationMain article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization) Book titles, like names of other works, are exempt from "lowercase second and subsequent words". This is an additional feature that can help in disambiguation, for instance, for distinguishing articles on a known phrase, and a book that has that phrase as title, examples:
[edit] PrecisionMain article: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (precision) Be aware that parenthetical qualifiers can introduce Point of View (POV) in a Wikipedia page name. For instance locating the article at Orlando (novel) or Orlando (biography), would add POV, to Orlando: A Biography, where the author attempted (deliberately, as explained by herself) to create a fiction/non-fiction cross-over genre; however Wikipedia's WP:NPOV does not apply to redirect pages, so it is appropriate to create redirects with these POV title in order to make Wikipedia easier to navigate. When using the title as written by the author, and nothing else, possible implications of POV are the author's (= external source) and not Wikipedia's. Trying to "purge" Wikipedia page names of an external author's intentions, would be creation of a new POV; Wikipedia's Neutral point of view (NPOV) policy includes not to tamper with what authors of notable works want to express with the title they give to their work (see also Wikipedia:NPOV tutorial#Article names). If there are opposing views about the book title, these are better explained in the article text and not crammed in the Wikipedia page name. Hence "(book)" or a similar qualifier is not used in article names, unless where needed for disambiguation from other Wikipedia pages. Examples:
[edit] See also
|
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |