| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Bear Ventilators, Bird Ventilators, Viasys Ventilation Systems,... coast2coastmedical.com | Herb Information - The English name, Latin name, Family and Local Names... holistic-herbalist.com | Convention Booth & Trade Show Chair Massage - Effective Convention... joylifetherapeutics.com | AVIAN FLU, Melbourne, BIRD Flu, Melbourne, Avian, Bird Flu, Viral... homeopathiccentre.com.au |
The aim of this WikiProject is to set out broad suggestions about how we organize data articles about birds and related topics. In general, these are only suggestions, and you shouldn't feel obliged to follow them. [edit] ScopeThis WikiProject aims to help organise our rapidly growing collection of articles about birds. Included in its scope are articles for all known species, genera, families, and orders of birds (both extant and extinct), as well as articles relating to bird anatomy, physiology, evolution, behaviours, diseases and parasites. Also included are articles relating to the study (ornithology) and the keeping (aviculture) of birds, articles on ornithological organisations, biographies of notable ornithologists and their works, and lists of birds found in various human-defined areas (i.e. countries, states/provinces, counties, etc.). [edit] ParentageThis WikiProject is an offshoot of WikiProject Tree of Life
There are no descendant WikiProjects at this time. [edit] Related WikiprojectsIt is worth keeping one eye on several Wikiprojects that are related, including Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans, Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecoregions and Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs. See also Wikiproject Birds at Wikimedia Commons. [edit] Participants[edit] Active
[edit] Inactive
[edit] Featured and Good Content[edit] Featured topic
[edit] Featured Articles (54)
[edit] Featured Article candidatesnone currently [edit] Good Articles (39)
[edit] Featured Lists (17)[edit] Featured List candidates[edit] Featured Pictures[edit] Featured Sounds[edit] FA/GA helpThe following are available to offer assistance with improving articles towards Good Article and Featured Article standard. Casliber · Jimfbleak (not graphics or maps) · MeegsC · Sabine's Sunbird . Shyamal (SVG illustrations) · SP-KP [edit] Spoken articlesThe list of spoken articles concerning WikiProject Bird is found here. [edit] Wikiproject Birds Userboxresults in:
[edit] Bird names and article titlesIn general, use the formal common name for article titles.
Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name. Some distinct groups are known only by their scientific name. Artamidae, for example, is a much better title than Woodswallows, butcherbirds, currawongs and the Australian Magpie. The common name of a species is always capitalised to differentiate it from more general terms.[1] The phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" indicates a large number of Sturnus vulgaris. In contrast, the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" indicates several different types of starling. This topic has been discussed often before and discussions may be found in the archives. (Examples: 10-1, 7-1, 7-2, 2-1, 2-2, 2-3). There is also a global committee set up as part of the International Ornithological Congress (http://www.worldbirdnames.org/) which has tried to standardize the English names of birds. (http://www.worldbirdnames.org/principles.html)
When creating a new article for a species, make sure the title is correctly capitalised and always create a redirect from the uncapitalised form. For example, name the article Bald Eagle but create a redirect to it from bald eagle. See the table at right for more examples. Creating the redirect is not optional. Note that the convention for capitalisation of names applies primarily to articles about birds, not to the whole encyclopedia. Contributors to other areas of the 'pedia (botany, politics, music, sport, and so on) cannot be expected to know or conform to the conventions of ornithology. Someone writing on a sports team called the "Christchurch King Penguins" may refer to "king penguins" without worrying about species capitalisation rules. And if they make an in-text link to king penguin, it should be redirected to King Penguin. It is the responsibility of the writer on King Penguins, not the writer on sports, to make the redirect. Also, this convention does not necessarily apply to articles on taxa other than birds. Summary of naming guidelines - common names
Summary of naming guidelines - scientific names
[edit] Regional listsIt is recommended that regional lists are named as List of birds of _REGION_ rather than to use List of _REGION_ADJECTIVE_ birds for the sake of consistency. [edit] Article sectionsMost of the bird species articles have a common structure which include various combinations of the following:
Additional sections may be included to cover aspects that are particularly interesting or well studied in that species. [edit] Taxonomy and referencesThis is likely to be the single most difficult part of the project. Not only does bird taxonomy vary significantly from one authority to another, but it is in a state of constant change. There is no single authority to rely on; no one list can claim to be the list. The preferred standard for common bird names is the IOC World Bird List (IOC) of the IOC (http://www.worldbirdnames.org). We are in the process of moving to this standard, and changes in order to conform to it need to be discussed individually (or in small groups when appropriate). Controversial moves need to be listed here and at WP:RM. This should be used for all articles except those where consensus decided otherwise and those dealing with a country or region, where the appropriate local official list should be used, as in List of North American birds and British Birds. Thus the article on Buteogallus anthracinus is called Common Black Hawk, following IOC, but in List of birds in Canada and the United States this species is called Common Black-Hawk, following the American Ornithologists' Union The major official sources include:
There are also a number of family monographs (such as the Hayman "Shorebirds" and Harrison's "Seabirds" in the Helm Identification Guides series); some are available on line at Amazon using the Search Inside feature (which requires a free membership in Amazon). Although a mine of information, these books reflect the authors' idiosyncrasies and soon become dated. [edit] Online resourcesA number of useful free to view online resources exist that are useful in writing bird-related articles: Referencing (free scientific articles from ornithological journals etc.)
Conservation status
Taxonomy
Images
Miscellaneous
[edit] Use a taxobox
In general, bird articles should have taxoboxes. This is something we have inherited from the Tree of Life WikiProject. There are many examples there to look at. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/taxobox usage for the full details on constructing a taxobox. Taxoboxes on the bird pages vary quite a bit from one another and could perhaps be standardised more than they are right now. This may or may not be a good thing. Discussion of this is welcome. There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut and paste insertion into entries:
[edit] Distribution mapsA good way to show a bird's area of occurrence is to add a distribution map; see the above example on how. Species with tiny areas of occurrence should get larger maps which are displayed thumbnailed. As for colors, the following are generally accepted as literature standard, for example by the Handbook of Birds of the World:
For species that do not migrate, a single color can be used as in the example. At-sea range of birds like albatrosses is usually marked in darker or lighter blue. Small islands can be marked with a larger dot and/or shown magnified in inserts. Migration flyways are often indicated with arrows. Areas of irruptive occurrence- more regular and plentiful than casual vagrancy, such as in crossbill species - can be indicated by colored stippling. It is good to use basic, web-safe colors. If using nonstandard coloration (e.g. Arctic Tern or Silvery Pigeon), it is important to annotate them. Former ranges of extinct birds can be indicated in dark grey (HBW standard) or red (many other), the former is probably preferable due to unambiguity. The "HBW standard" colors have one major advantage: they can also, due to differences in brightness, be distinguished by almost all people with some sort of color blindness. [edit] Other infoboxes
[edit] Tasklist
[edit] Species lists with redlinksThese are mainly missing redirects. Synonyms should be also added in the species' taxobox. [edit] Bird families with stub articles
[edit] Standing list of articles with several images but little textHere is a list of short articles which have had images added and could benefit being beefed up with text to balance the image content. Please help if you can. Also, all are potentially easy DYK noms (hint hint) :) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Standing list of articles with quality pictorial contentHere is a list of articles with either a Featured Picture, or a variety of pictures available, such as chicks, eggs, variant colour forms etc, which would be really done justice by a larger article. [edit] Former Featured Articles[edit] Former Good Articles[edit] Groups of articles heading towards featured topic (FT)Further information: Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria
[edit] See also
[edit] Reference
A cleanup listing for this project is available, updated by WolterBot. More information...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |