| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Legal dispute mediation - intro to mediation and mediators seniormag.com | Tubal Reversal Information on Wikipedia tubal-reversal.net | Sahaja Yoga Way of Mediation yoga4beginners.org | Contact Alzheimer Mediation For Dementia Conflict Today alzheimerfamilycaremanage... |
Mediation on Wikipedia is provided by two organisations:
What is mediation?Mediation is an activity in which a neutral third party, the mediator, guides and regulates structured discussion to facilitate reaching consensus on a disputed issue. The aspects of mediation commonly are:
The mediated agreement is described as the consensus of the parties on a proposal that has been developed with the help of the mediator. The mediator may or may not set out a formal agreement for the parties to accept; some mediators prefer to help guide the parties towards developing their own agreement. Agreement to mediate does not obligate the parties to accept any proposed agreements. Mediation is best when simultaneously protecting content and community. Mediation aims at working with the users in conflict to incorporate the information or viewpoints of both, while ensuring that the result conforms to all applicable Wikipedia policies. At the same time, it endeavors to produce sufficient peace between the parties to allow amicable discussion and prevent the need for future dispute resolution. Mediation is,
Mediation is not,
Mediation doesn't need to produce mutual amity between the disputants, though increased tolerance and respect is an important aim of any mediation. Who are mediators?Each mediator is granted the freedom to develop his or her own method, and to apply it to the specific case at hand. The method used by any given mediator may differ from the general guidelines set out here. The role of a mediator is unlike the role of a Wikipedia arbitrator; mediators are facilitators of voluntary discussion, while arbitrators hear evidence and issue binding rulings, including the ability to issue sanctions against users. Wikipedia mediators are permitted and encouraged to use their own best judgement to recommend a solution to the disputants, one that is in the best interests of the project. Where the position of one disputant is clearly unreasonable, the mediator is not required to subvert the integrity of the encyclopedia in order to reach a resolution. |
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |