A Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is a unique identifier to a published work, similar in concept to an ISBN. Wikipedia supports the use of DOI to link to published content. Where a journal source has a DOI, it is good practice to use it, in the same way as it is good practice to use ISBN references for book sources.
[edit] How to use DOIs in content
Wikipedia supports automatic linking of DOI references using the template {{doi}} as follows:
- {{doi|10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.001}}
Which translates to:
An alternate approach is to use CitationBot to improve the link still further:
- {{cite doi|10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.001}}
which will be parsed to:
- {{cite journal | doi = 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.001 | title = Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity | year = 2008 | author = Gray, K | journal = The Internet and Higher Education | volume = 11 | pages = 112}}
And presented as:
- Gray, K (2008). "Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity". The Internet and Higher Education 11: 112. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.03.001.
[edit] Why use DOI?
This approach avoids a number of common issues with citations in Wikipedia:
- Broken links as publishers move or reorganise content.
- Copy-paste errors in citation text.
- Copyright violation, accidental or deliberate; the DOI citation goes to a source identified as appropriate by the rights owner.
- Verifiability enhancements; the DOI will always lead to the correct source, so editorialising of abstracts or even content is avoided.
- Preferential treatment. DOI links, like our ISBN book sources, will offer the user a choice of sources where one exists.
- Academic users may receive a local full-text source
[edit] See also