This WikiProject is a project to better organize information in articles related to children's and young-adult literature. The main aims of this WikiProject are to: - Improve the overall quality of articles relating to children's and young-adult literature, including books, authors, and theory
- Identify those articles which need to be created, merged, or deleted
- Improve the categorization of these articles
- Define easily maintainable, useable, and well-documented templates and infoboxes related to this WikiProject
- Improve source citation in all these articles
- Propose criteria for (author, book, etc) list creation and inclusion
- Expand stub articles relating to Children's literature
- Perform cleanup on certain articles
[edit] Accomplishments [edit] Article alerts
- Proposed deletion
- Articles for deletion
- Good article nominations
- Good article reassessment
- Peer review
- Requested moves
- Did you know
- Other news
Article alerts are updated daily by ArticleAlertbot. — Tips /Report a bug / Got ideas? / Suggest news / Feedback [edit] Cleanup listing Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Cleanup listing [edit] Style guides and resources All articles should conform to the Wikipedia style guides. Some helpful resources include: Secondary style guide are specific to different projects. Conflict between any of these may arise, but discussion on the article's talk page will help to reach consensus. Some other helpful guides may be: For nominating articles to good article status: For nominating articles to featured article status: [edit] Categories [edit] Stub completion
[edit] Other WikiProjects This WikiProject is a child project of WikiProjects Literature, Books, and Novels, and a sister project of WikiProjects Artemis Fowl, Harry Potter, Redwall, and Fablehaven. [edit] Criteria for inclusion [edit] Authors What authors get their own articles? Probably almost all non-self-published authors, per bio guidelines that specify Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more What books get their own articles? - Award-winners
- Best sellers
- Cult classics
- Classics
- Frequently taught books
- Controverisal books
- pop culture books
[edit] Fictional characters and place names Individual articles on characters, locations, and other elements of a work of fiction are subject to Wikipedia's fictional elements notability guidelines—be aware of these guidelines before creating articles. [edit] Projects [edit] Meta-projects - We need to tag articles as members of this wikiproject
- We need a list of articles that need cleanup
- We need a list of articles that need work
Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.
[edit] Templates [edit] Project banner Add this template to article talk pages and fill in with appropriate assessment information. {{WikiProject Children's literature}} {{WikiProject Children's literature |class= |importance= |needs-infobox= |incomp-infobox= |needs-infobox-cover= |past-selected-article-bio= }} [edit] Portal link This template adds a link to Portal:Children and Young Adult Literature. Add it to relevant articles under the "See also" section. {{tl|Children and Young Adult Literature Portal}} [edit] User template Project participants can add this template to their user pages to identify themselves as members of this WikiProject. {{tl|user WikiProject Children's literature}} [edit] Welcome template Place this template onto new participant's talk pages (be sure to substitute). {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Welcome}} [edit] Assessment Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature Welcome to the assessment department of the Children's Literature WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's children's and young-adult literature related articles. Much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, but the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
Children and young adult literature
articles | Importance | | Top | High | Mid | Low | None | Total | | Quality |  FA | 3 | 9 | 5 | 1 | | 18 | | FL | | | 1 | | | 1 |  A | | | 1 | | | 1 |  GA | 5 | 10 | 11 | 6 | | 32 | | B | 12 | 38 | 61 | 14 | | 125 | | C | 9 | 15 | 44 | 15 | | 83 | | Start | 16 | 97 | 585 | 213 | 3 | 914 | | Stub | 4 | 48 | 1587 | 1587 | 5 | 3231 | | List | | | 41 | 10 | 1 | 52 | | Assessed | 49 | 217 | 2336 | 1846 | 9 | 4457 | | Unassessed | | | | | 404 | 404 | | Total | 49 | 217 | 2336 | 1846 | 413 | 4861 | [edit] Frequently asked questions - How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
- Just add {{Children'sLiteratureWikiProject}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
- Someone put a {{Children'sLiteratureWikiProject}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem appropriate. What should I do?
- If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of the project (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Children's Literature WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system WP:1.0 have been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
- What if I have a question not listed here?
- Leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Children's literature.
[edit] Instructions An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{Children'sLiteratureWikiProject}} project banner on its talk page: - {{NovelsWikiProject| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter: The following values may be used for the importance parameter: The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. [edit] Quality scale WikiProject article quality grading scheme | Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | | FA | The article has attained featured article status. | More detailed criteria | | The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. - It is—
- (a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;
- (b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
- (c) well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature on the topic. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported with citations; this requires a "References" section that lists these sources, complemented by inline citations where appropriate;
- (d) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
- (e) stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
- It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of—
- (a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
- (b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents; and
- (c) consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended.
- Images. It has images that follow the image use policy and other media where appropriate, with succinct captions, brief and useful alt text when feasible, and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
- Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
| | Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Tourette Syndrome
(as of March 2009) | | A | The article is well-organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. | More detailed criteria | The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Films). | | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help. | Batman (1989 film)
(as of October 2008) | | GA | The article has attained good article status. | More detailed criteria | The article meets the good article criteria: - Well-written:
- (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
- (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
- Factually accurate and verifiable:
- (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
- (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and
- (c) it contains no original research.
- Broad in its coverage:
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by images:
- (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
| | Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Usain Bolt
(as of May 2009) |  B | The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. | More detailed criteria | The article meets the six B-Class criteria: - The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged.
- The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
- The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
- The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
- The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
- The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
| | Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Jammu and Kashmir
(as of September 2007) |  C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. | More detailed criteria | | The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. | | Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues. | Exeter Cathedral
(as of June 2008) |  Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. | More detailed criteria | | The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted. | | Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. | Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation. | Real analysis
(as of November 2006) |  Stub | A very basic description of the topic. | More detailed criteria | | The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. | | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. | Geodia gibberosa
(as of July 2009) | | FL | The article has attained featured list status. | More detailed criteria | The article meets the featured list criteria: - Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
- Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
- Comprehensiveness.
- (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
- (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; it is not a content fork, does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
- Structure. It is easy to navigate through and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
- Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
- Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
| | Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
(as of February 2009) |  List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of aikidoka
(as of June 2007) | [edit] Importance scale The criteria used for rating article importance are meant to be an probable indication of how significant the topic is to a reader of literature, and how likely it would be covered in a serious encyclopedia. Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Article importance grading scheme | Label | Criteria | | Top | Subject is a "core" topic for literature. | | High | Subject is very notable or significant within its field of literature. | | Mid | Subject is notable or significant within the field of literature (or to a historian), but not necessarily outside it. | | Low | Subject is not particularly notable (but notable enough to be included on Wikipedia) or significant even within the field of literature, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of a notable author or other notable subject. | [edit] Requesting an assessment If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. (Note that this is not required; any editor may assess or re-assess an article on their own, if acting in good faith.) If you assess an article, please strike it off so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Comments are not mandatory and any should be left at the article's talk page; the list below will be wiped periodically. The 39 Clues This article is rated stub class now. I'm not sure how it should be rated, but it certainly should not be rated stub class. Ag97 (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)The Highfield Mole Severely cleaned this page up. Dracoster (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Christopher Smart and his Hymns for the Amusement of Children and The Parables of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus ChristIf you mean the thing in the Talk pg., One False Note of the 39th clues.Magyk, Flyte, Physik, Queste, Septimus Heap, Jenna Heap, Marcia Overstrand - all have been changed substantially since their last rating. Please review them once again. "Legolas" (talk) 06:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Fabulous Histories - This is a new article I created when I stumbled upon the children's lit portal and discovered it was a redlink. I need help expanding it, and was pointed here by DuncanHill. H2O Shipper 00:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)The Lightning Thief - It's listed as stub-class, but I think it's beyond that now. DreamHaze (talk) 17:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC) (Forgot to sign before)The Dead and the Gone - Hasn't been rated, yet, and I'd appreciate an outside opinion of how it can be improved. DreamHaze (talk) 17:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)It's Just a Plant - Hasn't been rated yet, I significantly expanded the article from a two sentence stub.Sea Change (Armstrong novel) - currently rated stub, recently expanded. Robina Fox (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Kay Tracey - currently listed as a stub; I have expanded it considerably. Ricardiana (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)The Dana Girls - another stub that I expanded. Ricardiana (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)- Deutscher Jugendliteraturpreis - currently listed as a stub, I have expanded significantly since the last assessment. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 14:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Thunder Oak - I'm still working on this, but I'm confident to say it isn't a stub anymore, at least. Zekiw (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)List of Stratemeyer Syndicate series This is a new article and has not yet been rated. Ricardiana (talk) 04:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Otto of the Silver Hand A new article that has not yet been rated. Caleb Jontalk 23:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)The Dragon's Eye The first book of the Erec Rex series. I'm getting the book today so I will try to insert a picture and more information. Programmer13TalkWhat I do 15:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Jacqueline Woodson I expanded this stub.Maniac Magee by Jerry Spinelli. Expanded this from a stub.Maniacmagee (talk) 19:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC) Add new requests above this line [edit] Participants This is a list of Wikipedians who are committed to this WikiProject. If you're interested in helping with this project, please, feel free to join by clicking edit on the right, and signing your name at the bottom of the list with four tildes (~~~~), with an optional comment. A Add this template to your user page {{user WikiProject Children's literature}}  | This user is a member of the Children and Young Adult Literature WikiProject. |
You don't need to be actively writing articles to be a participant. Please add your name to the list below (you may add a comment if you wish). Editors who make no edits to Wikipedia at all in six months will be pruned from the list. Editors can always join the list again when they return to Wikipedia. [edit] Active members - melopoeia (talk · contribs) - I would like to focus on expanding/editing the History and Scholarship articles (specifically literary theory), as these are my areas of expertise. My other articles primarily would be on nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century British and American texts. I can start with The Wind in the Willows.
- Awadewit (talk · contribs) – Most of my articles will be on eighteenth-century British children's authors and texts since that is my area of scholarly expertise
- Aurum ore (talk · contribs) – 5 September 2008
- Cgingold (talk · contribs) – writer of non-fiction children's history, etc.
- D3t3ctiv3 (talk · contribs) - I probably won't write any new articles,but try to improve existing ones.I am an avid reader,and hopefully can help make a featured article.
- Fairweather01 (talk · contribs) - 29 September 2008
- Freechild (talk · contribs) – 9 January 2008
- Joyous! (talk · contribs) – 1 October 2008 – Concentrating for now on Newbery Honor books
- Hurricanewest (talk · contribs) - 2 March 2009 - right now concentrating on bring the Percy Jackson series up to snuff, but am more than willing to help where ever I can
- Kethra (talk · contribs) - 5 November 2008 - many interests, including young adult fantasy and sci-fi
- KGV (talk · contribs)
- Ladywitchthought (talk · contribs) – Joined 28 March 2008, Updated 3 October 2008 – Helping with ASOUE and The Faraway Tree Series
- Legolas2186 (talk · contribs) - 13 January 2009, Developing the Septimus Heap world
- camgal (talk · contribs)- ?? -Cheryl Moore-Murnane Brandt-Guardian Ad Litem-Ramsey County-Developing Children with disability story handouts
- Mavarin (talk · contribs) – 28 July 2006 – Concentrating on L'Engle primarily
- Merpin (talk · contribs)
- Mervyn (talk · contribs) – Wide-ranging interests.
- Mistsrider (talk · contribs) – 7 February 2008 – Particularly interested in Ursula Le Guin's Earthsea and other female authors I believe are underappreciated (Susan Cooper, Patricia C. Wrede), as well as literature with odd stories and/or female protagonists, but will help out wherever I can.
- Mr. Absurd (talk · contribs) – 14 June 2008
- N p holmes (talk · contribs) – 23 Feb 2008
- Paycheckgurl (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- plad2 (talk · contribs) Joined 20 February 2008. I'm a Publisher at Random House Children's Books UK.
- Pegship (talk · contribs)
- Ricardiana (talk · contribs)
- Rising*From*Ashes (talk · contribs) - 13 October 2009
- Robina Fox (talk · contribs) – 7 July 2008 - particularly interested in children's historical novels. Would also like to improve coverage of Carnegie Medal winners.
- Sabiona (talk · contribs) – 26 May 2009 - I'm a teacher-librarian in a middle school. Specific interests include anything that appeal to reluctant readers.
- Sanilrivka (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC) - Interested in cleaning up and providing sources for Sweet Valley High and other similar series.
- Schuym1 (talk · contribs)
- Strdst grl (talk · contribs) - Working mostly on assessing articles.
- TCO (talk · contribs) - 01 November 2008 - Just getting to know the project now. Will try to contribute articles for classic books that should be here and aren't.
- Tem2 (talk · contribs) - 02 March 2006 - Available for grunt work on request and will check in as time permits. Interests include fantasy/sci-fi middle grade novels, New England authors, and debut authors.
- voceditenore (talk · contribs) - 2 October 2008. Usually write on opera but recently 'rescued' Parts and No Jumping on the Bed! and enjoyed it. Hope to do more.
- Pmlinediter (talk · contribs) - 13:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Simpsons lover 909 (talk · contribs)- writes the Barawa book awards
- DreamHaze (talk · contribs) - I have a tendency to edit children's literature articles, so I figured that I could make it official.
- Miriam.newman (talk · contribs)
- Programmer13 (talk · contribs) - I read a lot of Eragon, Eldest, Artemis Fowl, you know, "Children's literature".
- Twilight Helryx (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC) - I've always been a bookworm and most of the books I read are children and young adult novels (Inheritance Cycle, Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Twilight, etc). I'm currently working on cleaning up Guardians of Ga'Hoole and will help out on whatever article of a book or book series that needs work (provided I've read them of course).
[edit] Inactive members - 60 Delta (talk · contribs)
- Aidoflight (talk · contribs)
- BengalRenaissanceEccentrica (talk · contribs)
- Cheesefee (talk · contribs)
- Chicopac (talk · contribs) – interning at the Children's Literature Comprehensive Database. Fan of some kid's books.
- Elizabeth_Lund (talk · contribs)
- FinFangFoom (talk · contribs)
- KittyRainbow (talk · contribs) – 24 October 2007
- Lbr123 (talk · contribs)
- Lemonsour (talk · contribs)
- Nuclear froggy (talk · contribs) Joined on 29 April 2007
- Sanjay Tiwari (talk · contribs) Joined on 18 September 2006. I'm very interested in Victorian and Edwardian (British) children's literature, especially the out-of-prints authors. I've created templates for 18th Century British Children's Literature, 19th Century British Children's Literature, and Early 20th Century British Children's Literature.
- Stratford490 (talk · contribs) – 15 June 2008
- Sudhirn (talk · contribs) Sudhir Neerattupuram, Writing various children books. His various books are published by the leading publishers in Kerala like Kairali Children Book Trust (DC Books), Kurushetra Prakashan, Bala Sahity Prakashan etc. His books are Iswarante Chiri, Swami Vivekanandan Paranja Kadakal, Subhashita Saram, Amritavachanagal, Ramayana Prasnotiri, etc.
- Tomandlu (talk · contribs)
- Tyciol (talk · contribs)
- Woggly (talk · contribs)
- WTGDMan1986 (talk · contribs) – 23 August 2008 – I have been writing fiction and young adult literature since December 25, 1994 - and I have written four books since September 24, 2004. I wish to protect the Twilight and Harry Potter articles from unnecessary vandalism.
[edit] Former members The following users have retired from this WikiProject. - Abbeybufo (talk · contribs) – I fear that at the moment I have insufficient time to do more than visit Wikipedia occasionally - will check back in when I can.
- Bellwether_BC (talk · contribs) (Retired from Wikipedia in May 2008)
- Gears of War (talk · contribs) – 25 June 2008 (Retired from Wikipedia in August 2008)
- Kitia (talk · contribs) I've been working on this for a while now, but have never officially joined. (Blocked indefinitely)
- Nothing444 (talk · contribs) (Blocked indefinitely)
|
