Centralized discussion
Proposals	Discussions	Recurring proposals
Proposal to rename Articles for Deletion to Articles for Discussion, include the discussion of mergers. Proposal for targeted flagging. Petitions to turn on, and not to turn on, the Flagged revisions extension. Discussion on adding language about schools to the organization notability guidelines. Proposal on creating a "Book" namespace. Discussion regarding the spam blacklist and reliability of sources Discussion of "self-promotion and indiscriminate coverage" in the Notability guideline. Discussion on retaining the restriction against using the string "bot" in usernames. Discussion on promoting Wikipedia:Notability (law) to guideline status Discussion on CfD speedy renaming criteria 6 (disambiguation fixes from an unqualified name). Discussion on refining Community de-adminship (aka Admin Recall) to formalize a RfC. Proposal for achieving infobox-template coherence of properties in Wikipedia(s) Discussion on promoting Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals) to guideline status Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
archive • talk • edit • history • watch

Wikipedians frequently discuss proposed changes to Wikipedia policy; these may take the form of new proposals, amendments to existing policies or guidelines, or straw polls. These discussions generally take place on relevant talk pages. They may also occur at Meta-Wiki, on IRC, and on our mailing lists.

Village pump (policy) and Village pump (proposals) provide central areas both for giving notice of discussions elsewhere and for debate itself. Despite regular archiving, these pages tend to grow rather lengthy. It's not always easy to know what issues are active.

The box template {{cent}} is a centralized list of ongoing policy discussions and polls. It is found on pages where such debate takes place and, of course, you may refer to it directly at any time. Editors maintain this list by adding ongoing discussions and polls and by periodically removing inactive issues.

[edit] Usage

• This page is for explanation of the way in which we use {{cent}}.
• Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion is for discussion of this process only.
• Template:Cent contains the actual box content of ongoing policy issues. It should be edited to stay current at all times.
• Template:Cent/doc contains technical documentation of the template.
• Template talk:Cent contains discussion of related technical issues.
• You may create any page of the form [[Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Some topic]] if it does not appear that any particular existing talk page is the correct place for a policy-related discussion. Please note that there are a great many talk pages; a very large number of discussions are ongoing. Before creating yet another debate page, check to see that the topic is not already under discussion elsewhere. Search the project for keywords related to the topic in question.
• Discussions are summarized at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Conclusions.

[edit] Cautions

Like any tool, this may be misused. Kindly exercise restraint, assume good faith, and allow process to take its course. Please don't add new policy ideas indiscriminately; trial balloons are better floated at Village pump (proposals). This template should be reserved for ongoing discussions. Remember, its usefulness is in inverse proportion to its size.

Before joining a debate, it might be wise to gather some background, especially on complex or long-standing issues. Please be courteous to your fellow editors and read existing discussion before adding your own comment. It's hoped that {{cent}} will contribute to the opening of policy debate and the broadening of consensus; but of course no good purpose is served by uninformed comment. Stay cool.

[edit] See also

• Wikipedia proposals
• Wikipedia policy
• Wikipedia guidelines
• Wikipedia rejected proposals
• Wikipedia:Perennial proposals
• How to create policy
• Polling is not a substitute for discussion
• Wikipedia:Closing discussions