| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
- EuroSpine 2009 Warsaw, Poland - October 21 - 24 eurospine.org | - Laser Eye Surgery Article - 10th October... eyeinfo.com |
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 02:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Noah Ringer
Noah Ringer is not notable. He has only appeared so far in one unreleased film. According to WP:ENT, an actor has to have had multiple notable roles. He has had only one role. Also, not that much information is at all available about him. For example, the source for his age and home is IMDB, an unreliable source. He simply is not notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. SkepticBanner (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] The Big Five (band)
No indication of notability; no sources provided. Note: while this article would likely fail criteria for speedy deletion A7, I thought I'd give it a chance to be improved by using proposed deletion. However, the prod was declined with no improvements made to the article. older ≠ wiser 22:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 02:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] A Game With Future
Contested PROD; I don't see any notability; cannot find any reliable sources Chzz ► 23:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 02:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] XBNBT
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] IDP: IELTS Australia
Non-notable subsidiary of a non-notable corporation. Orange Mike | Talk 22:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC) Maybe is not notable in America. However, please, notice this is the English Wikipedia. This organisation is very much notable in Australia and East Asia. Indeed, the Governemnt of Australia publicly recognises this body IDP: IELTS Australia. Also, you can find this body across all official IELTS websites: Speedy delete under criteria A7. ---Irbisgreif-(talk | e-mail)-(contribs) 19:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete, article kept. JamieS93 22:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Mr. Billion
Non-notable film. Not every film made in the United States is notable. Orange Mike | Talk 22:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
No offense but you obviously aren't looking hard enough. Just type it in google there is a lot of information on the film at IMDB, rotten tomatoes, amazon, moviefone, etc.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Doonesbury#Walden_College. There was no useful content to merge, and the target itself is unsourced so will need attention. SilkTork *YES! 23:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Walden College
Fictional college from Doonsebury comics. No references. All original research Blargh29 (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was merge to A_Different_World_(TV_series). Black Kite 19:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] Hillman College
Fictional college from The Cosby Show its spinoff. No real relevant refs. Most of the text of the article is original research and synthesis companies the fictional college to Spelman College. Blargh29 (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 00:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] V.V.L.N.Sastry
Inadequately sourced BLP?, was deleted as a prod but restored upon request. Notability not demonstrated by non-trivial multiple reliable sources. Fails V, N, BIO & BLP. Spartaz Humbug! 16:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Many reliable sources about V.V.L.N.Sastry can be found in google search. one can click the following url [13] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakshmisiddhi (talk • contribs) 17:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC) ====Lot many reliabe sources about V.V.L.N.Sastry Dearest Friends, For god's sake, please do not delete this article. Ignorance is sin. But we can enlighten ourselves with a simple google search on V.V.L.N.Sastry, lot of credible sources and updates. [14]Click the URL. Lakshmi SiddhiLakshmisiddhi (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)--Lakshmisiddhi (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment These Keep votes seem a bit heated and unorthodox at best (if not off-the-wall). (Is there a wiff of WP:meatpuppetry?) But in the interests of "international relations" :-), here's a list of possible sources that I can't sort through, because their relevance or irrelevance requires a more sensitive understanding of the culture than I possess. But if some of these KEEP !voters (per WP:AGF, I hope there is more than one such !voter and none of them are in WP:COI trouble) could sort through them, I think there is a good chance of getting this article out of AfD successfully. --Firefly322 (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
^^^^^'LISTEN'^^^^^That need not be a link to Business India, for that matter, Business India doesnot keep their content on website, it's a book publication very popular and top rated business magzine. The clipping put on to the website is authentic. If one needs to go by Orangamike, to identify a person, he may say that, the person should sit with their parents. Even when some one is trying to identify with ample sources, he doesnot want to listen and see logic. HEY LISTEN, Orangemike. High Time. NgandhiInd (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
@@@@@SpacemanSpiff!!!!! Stop justifying your wrong act of faulty links and your weird attempts by trying to spoil the image of others and trying to create some image for yourself. See the point pro-activelyNgandhiInd (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)— NgandhiInd (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete, then redirect to Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago. NW (Talk) 17:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] CBTT
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] It's over gaming
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] Danny AbbadiNon-notable boxer. Orange Mike | Talk 21:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
The result was keep. NW (Talk) 17:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute
Does not seem to be a notable organiztion, sources, with one exception to a Malta ... I'm not sure what that is ... all suggest this is just another quasi-religious group jockeying for political power but very little evidence they seem to actually have any. IMHO, they seem to criticize LGBT legislation, culture but aren't even known well for doing that. Absent strong independent reliable sourcing I think it may be too soon for this article. -- Banjeboi 20:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
— 77.253.83.48 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. See the Ackerman AfD, which I'm also taking into account to some degree. The "merge" opinions appear to be moot, as Schott is (now?) mentioned in Service number (United States Marine Corps). Sandstein 07:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] Alexander Schott
Just being first alphabetically when the USMC started issuing service numbers does not make someone notable, also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ackerman (USMC). ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 19:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that just having service number one, even if that fact is mentioned in any number of books, is not sufficient to establish notability. Sandstein 07:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] James Ackerman (USMC)
Does this fact make the individual notable? CynofGavuf 18:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete: All required information is already contained in Service number (United States Marine Corps). Unlikely search term, and no information from this article needs to be retained.—Kww(talk) 20:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Even on the assumption that getting the lowest service number is somehow notable, this is, at best, WP:BIO1E. Indeed, there is no reason to believe that the mentions in the "military history textbooks", if they exist, are anything more than trivial. Service record copies obviously cannot establish notability, otherwise every single serviceman would be notable. Tim Song (talk) 20:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 17:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Hiroshima Flower Festival
Unnotable local festival. Fails WP:N. Purely sourced to festival website and appears to be more of an ad than anything else. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, just blog posts, local notes, and press releases. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted per various criteria, and salted. Author(s) indefblocked as spam-only accounts. Wknight94 talk 17:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Centigradz
repeatedly recreated SPAM article about non notable band, speedy removed by suspected sockpuppet of article creator. WuhWuzDat 15:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Koala attacks in Australia
Disputed prod. lacks notability to sustain an article Gnangarra 15:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] George Clemens
Brief unsourced article about a "famous" English carpenter and furniture maker from the early 1800s. PRODded for lack of source or confirmation; PROD removed by author without comment. I have made searches (detailed on the article talk page) both on-line and in a good library, and can find no confirmation at all. This is probably a hoax, and certainly fails WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 15:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. Some good suggestions for merging and doing so would make a lot of sense IMHO. However, considering the size of both articles I think a standard "mergeto" request would be better then an AFD "merge" close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Fictional history of Dick Grayson
This page consists almost exclusively of in-universe content with little or no real-world notability. PROD was contested. Stifle (talk) 13:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Dorothy Valentine
Prod removed with little improvement. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER, not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows etc. Tassedethe (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete both. NW (Talk) 01:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] 2023 Rugby World Cup
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Surprisingly enough, the Rubgy union powers-that-be have awarded a contract for the 2019 World Cup already, so an article on that topic is entirely appropriate. Everything in the articles about 2023 and 2027, however, is pure speculation that could not possibly be supported by reliable sources because such sources do not yet exist. R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Ahmed Ali (footballer born 1990)
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Domini Homes
Non notable company - no indication of why it should be on Wikipedia. noq (talk) 10:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] IYY (software)
Article about non-notable software - first release was less than a month ago. No references that meet WP's requirements. Fails WP:N and WP:VER andy (talk) 08:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. no reason for keeping; we have a way of doing school projects, and it consists of assistance in first finding notable subjects. It is t onobody's benefit to permit articles that do not meet our requirements when there are so many genuine gaps in coverage. DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Uptown Consignment
Prod removed by author with following comments: This is a school project could you please wait a week or two before you delete it. I am not finnished and it still needs to be graded. Pinkprincess14 (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Original Prod reasoning: Non-notable company. Claims of notability (Hartford Advocate and Hartford Magazine awards) cannot be verified, and would not likely meet notability standards anyway. I can not find any reliable sources that indicate this is a notable company. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. NW (Talk) 01:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] German Martinez Hidalgo
Non-notable, unreferenced bio -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 06:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was A7 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Willard's CanteenAfDs for this article:
No real claim of notability or significant ghits for this one-man band. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was redirect to History of Microsoft Windows#Windows 8. Also full protecting this for a good while, as it has been recreated several times now. NW (Talk) 01:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Windows 8AfDs for this article:
Unreferenced WP:CRYSTAL. Appears to be a recreation of an article deleted twice due to the same reason. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 06:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Neil Brown (athlete)
Not competed at a sufficiently high level for inclusion1 Chris (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Cold friending
Neologism sourced to a blog. 16 Google hits, nothing on Gnews. I couldn't find a speedy delete criterion for neologisms, unfortunately. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. We do not have consensus that the guideline should be applied in this instance. Sandstein 09:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Red-billed
Another dab page with no valid entries and no obvious redirect. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:55, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. speedy/snow deleting. tedder (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Matty Blades
Not notable enough, methinks Chris (talk) 05:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Charles Kubly
Not sure if any of this is enough to pass notability. His Bands have been ISSMA rated, performed in a few parades. Don't see anything notable. Ridernyc (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. Alexius08 (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Distillers in Canada
Actually, Alan, your page says you are from New Zealand. Alcohol in New Zealand refers to the two articles Beer in New Zealand and New Zealand wine, but there is nothing for distillers. Do you know if the New Zealand distillers are mentioned somewhere else? Also Alcoholic beverages in New Zealand does not exist. If there is some naming convention or something that I am missing, please fill me in. Facts707 (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] C. Siriwardene
Fails WP:ATH. The article does not have the full name of the player. He played a single match of cricket for a first-class team (at least, the opponents were first-class). Cmprince (talk) 05:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Fredric J. Harris
Doesn't appear to pass bio notability. JaGatalk 02:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Upendra Tripathy
Terrible resume article, doesn't appear to pass notability, but I'll put it here to verify the Joint Secretary position doesn't qualify as notable. JaGatalk 01:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Young SonAfDs for this article:
I fail to see how this artist satisfies WP:MUSIC... he's unsigned, has no charted hits, has no non trivial, secondary sources, he hasn't gone on a major international tour, his singles aren't in any major radio station's rotation, and the author (judging by his username and that the majority of his contributions are related to Young Son) has a likely conflict of interest. Additionally, save for his one studio album, his other releases are either red-linked or redirect back to Young Son. He has been nominated for several local awards of questionable notability. I am also nominating his album: 2 says you, says two 01:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. From the vote count, this seems like an easy keep. However, a large potion of the comments are not particularly strong. Several of the votes simply assert that the subject is notable, or point to a Google News search and say that establishes notability. However, there are a few keep votes are quite strong and back up their views with specific links and evidence. My analysis of the discussion lends me to weigh those votes heavily enough to close this as keep. NW (Talk) 18:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Gina de Venecia
Article about a non-notable person. User234 (talk) 01:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Fences&Windows 00:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] 22 Marsh Wall
Notability. Just another tall residential building in the Docklands with no significant contribution to the city or architecture. Not relevant as work of a prominent architect. Karljoos (talk) 00:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 08:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Chelsea Hieda
Doesn't seem sufficiently notable. Rd232 talk 23:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Nikole Churchill
Delete notability: "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports.... to constitute sufficient evidence of notability – particularly for living individuals known for one event (WP:BLP1E)." Riphamilton (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP1E. --Whoosit (talk) 19:51, 17 October 2009
notability: The Facts of the Article are Accurate and is verifiable through not only the Hampton university Records of the Pageant, but in the numerous news accounts and other archival records that are easily checked. What is in dispute here and what people want to erase or change is the historical fact of what is written in the 2nd article of the controversy caused by her winning the Pageant and where some did not want a "White" woman to win and felt that she was intruding on sacred ground. In response to this Miss Churchill wrote a controversal letter to President Obama asking for his assistance because of his influance with the University itself. In this letter are some comments she took out of context and caused more controversy. Again. All of this is historical facts not subject to change because it is impossible to change history. But there are some who want to erase history and this must be prevented at any costs. The Nazi's did this, the Soviets did this, as have other dictitorial agencies who do not want notariety of particular events especially when it involves insulting or invading their personal bias or beliefs. Nikole Churchill succeeded in creating a point in history that is notable in that she broke a race barrier that may seem insignificant today but might or might not become celebrated as a major changing point in history. Just as it was with a black woman who refused to sit in the back of the bus, which at the time was insignificant but took decades to realize that, staged or not, the event was a point where history was made. "To demand deletion of an article of an historic event simply because one or two "Dissenters" do not like the subject is totally uncalled for. The 1st Black President is a historic event. The 1st White Beauty Pageant winner in a predominantly black contest is a historic event, just as it would be if turned around, a Black pageant winner in a predominantly White contest is a historic event. Bias comes in many forms, one of the most henious is one of 'Changing or deleting History'" Rudeseal (talk) 23:19, 18 October 2009 DO NOT Delete
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] The Best of The Harveyville Fun Times!
Self-published book of unclear notability; 65 "unique" Google results, all booksellers and blogs. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 16:07, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Note: Text copied to http://thebookthing.wikia.com/wiki/The_Best_of_The_Harveyville_Fun_Times Ikip (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Greenlifestyle
non-notable organization Timergain (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] Agile platform
Promotion for non-notable software product by SPA. No reliable sources. Partly a copyright infringement of [33]. Haakon (talk) 11:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC) [edit] Irish goodbye | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
