The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus without prejudice to speedy renomination. Listed for almost 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator, and no comments from other editors at all for the past 20 days. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Christine Talbot

Christine Talbot (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(Find sources: "Christine Talbot" — search, news, books, scholar, images )

Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. ƒ(Δ)² 07:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

• Weak keep I think that WP:ENTERTAINER is a more accurate category to use as a guideline as she is a television personality, not a journalist. She satisfies the criteria of having a significant role in multiple television shows (as a presenter for BBC North West Tonight and a co-anchor of Calendar as the most significant). --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 14:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

• I do not think ENTERTAINER applies to people who deal with journalism and news-related issues. ƒ(Δ)² 16:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

• Discussion here. ƒ(Δ)² 17:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.