Watt balance Information & Watt balance Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Exercise Products, Balance , EMP Balance Pad, EMP Balance Beam
Exercise Products, Balance, EMP Balance Pad, EMP Balance Beam
accesshealth.com.au
  Balance s & Scales ? Sitemap, Analytical Balance , Precision Balance
Balances & Scales ? Sitemap, Analytical Balance, Precision Balance
blockscientific.com
  Balance Centre - The Wellington Balance Centre - Balance & Vestibular...
Balance Centre - The Wellington Balance Centre - Balance & Vestibular...
thewellingtonbalancecentr...
 Spring Balance , Buy Handheld Spring Balance Online, Pocket Spring...
Spring Balance, Buy Handheld Spring Balance Online, Pocket Spring...
surgicalshop.com
 
The NIST watt balance is a project of the U.S. Government to develop an “electronic kilogram.” The vacuum chamber dome, which lowers over the entire apparatus, is visible at top.

The watt balance is an experimental electromechanical measuring instrument that measures the weight of a test mass very precisely by the strength of an electric current. It is being developed as a metrological instrument that may one day provide a definition of the kilogram unit of mass based on electronic units, a so-called "electronic kilogram".

Contents

[edit] Overview

The watt balance is a more accurate version of the ampere balance, in which the force between two current-carrying coils is measured and then used to calculate the magnitude of the current. In this new application, the balance will be used in the opposite sense; the current in the coils necessary to support the weight of a standard kilogram mass will be measured, "weighing" the kilogram. This will define the mass of a kilogram in terms of a current and a voltage, as described below. Since current and voltage units are already defined in terms of fundamental physical constants such as the speed of light and Planck's constant, this will provide an alternate definition of the kilogram in terms of these absolute constants. This may be a better definition than the current one, which defines the kilogram as the mass of a physical artifact, the international prototype kilogram, which is vulnerable to deterioration or damage.

The principle of the watt balance was proposed by B. P. Kibble of the UK National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in 1975.[1] The main weakness of the ampere balance method is that the result depends on the accuracy with which the dimensions of the coils are measured. The watt balance method has an extra calibration step in which the effect of the geometry of the coils is eliminated, removing the main source of uncertainty. This extra step involves moving the force coil through a known magnetic flux at a known speed.

The present accuracy record is held by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with a relative uncertainty of 3.6 × 10−8,[2] and experiments are continuing towards a goal of 1 × 10−8. Apart from the watt balances at the NPL and NIST, similar experiments are also taking place at the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology (METAS) in Berne, the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) near Paris and Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE) in Trappes, France.[3] The long-term goal of these experiments is to produce a new definition of the kilogram based on fundamental physical constants, to replace the present definition based on the International Prototype Kilogram, a cylinder of platinum/iridium owned by the BIPM.

[edit] Principle

A conducting wire of length L which carries an electric current I perpendicular to a magnetic field of strength B will experience a force equal to BLI. In the watt balance, the current is varied so that this force exactly counteracts the weight of a standard mass m, which is given by the mass multiplied by the gravitational acceleration g. This is also the principle behind the ampere balance.

Kibble's watt balance avoids the problems of measuring B and L with a second calibration step. The same wire (in practice a coil of wire) is moved through the same magnetic field at a known speed v. By Faraday's law of induction, a potential difference U is generated across the ends of the wire, which is equal to BLv. Hence the unknown quantities B and L can be eliminated from the equations to give

UI = mgv\,

Both sides of the equation have the dimensions of power, measured in watts in the International System of Units, hence the name "watt balance".

[edit] Measurements

Accurate measurements of electric current and potential difference are made in conventional electrical units rather than SI units, which are based on fixed conventional values of the Josephson constant and the von Klitzing constant, KJ–90 and RK–90 respectively. The current watt balance experiments are equivalent to measuring the value of the conventional watt in SI units. From the definition of the conventional watt, this is equivalent to measuring the value of the product KJ2RK in SI units instead of its fixed value in conventional electrical units.

K_{\rm J}^2 R_{\rm K} = K_{\rm J-90}^2 R_{\rm K-90}\frac{mgv}{U_{90}I_{90}}

The importance of such measurements is that they are also a direct measurement of the Planck constant h:

h = \frac{4}{K_{\rm J}^2 R_{\rm K}}

The principle of the "electronic kilogram" would be to define the value of the Planck constant in the same way that the speed of light is defined by the definition of the meter. In this case, the electric current and the potential difference would be measured in SI units, and the watt balance would become an instrument to measure mass.

m = \frac{UI}{gv}

Any laboratory which had invested the (very considerable) time and money in a working watt balance would be able to measure masses to the same accuracy as they currently measure the Planck constant.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Kibble, B. P. (1975), Sanders, J. H.; Wapstra, A. H., eds., Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants 5, New York: Plenum, pp. 545–51 
  2. ^ Steiner, R. L.;Williams, E. R.; Liu, R.; Newell, D. B. (2007), "Uncertainty Improvements of the NIST Electronic Kilogram", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 56 (2): 592–596, doi:10.1109/TIM.2007.890590 
  3. ^ Mohr, Peter J.; Taylor, Barry N.; Newell, David B. (2008). "CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2006". Rev. Mod. Phys. 80: 633–730. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.633. http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/codata.pdf. 

[edit] External links




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots