| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Wage labour is the socioeconomic relationship between a worker and an employer in which the worker sells their labour under a contract (employment), and the employer buys it, often in a labour market.[1][Need quotation on talk to verify]It is the effort that people devote to a task for which they are paid [2] The products of labour become the employer's property. A wage labourer is a person whose primary means of income is to sell labour in this way. Although there are antecedents in many stages of historical development wage labour is primarily associated with capitalism. The phrase is also sometimes used to mean the labour done for an employer in exchange for a wage.
[edit] TypesThe most common form of wage labour currently is a contract in which a free worker sells his labour for a predetermined time (e.g. a few months or a year), in return for a money-wage or salary.[citation needed] However, wage labour takes many other forms, and many different kinds of contracts and forms of remuneration are possible. Economic history shows a great variety of ways in which labour is traded and exchanged. The differences show up in the form of:
[edit] Critique of wage labourThe first point of criticism is on the freedom of the worker. The capitalist societies emerged from removing the alternative means of self-sustainment used previously by peasants. Historical records shows that every time people had their own land to cultivate for themselves, as was the case for most population in pre-industrial England, colonial Kenya[3] or in colonial Australia, they didn't commit to work for an employer. In such cases, laws had been promulgated to expel peasants from their lands, and to make the price of the land artificially high, so that a common person would have to work an entire lifetime to buy it. The second point of criticism, is that after people have been compelled to no feasible alternative than that of wage labour, exploitation occurs. The worker is kept in a condition of mere survival, while the wealth produced by its work goes to the employer. And also the technological progress which increases productivity, is not used to reduce the work time and improve the quality of life of the worker, instead, it is used entirely to increase the profit of the employer. The employer who buys this labour power as it was a mere commodity, owns the labour process and can sell the products to make profit. On the other hand, the worker sells their creative energy and their liberty for a given period, and are alienated from their own labour, as well as its products. Wage labour is often criticized as "wage slavery" by socialists and most anarchists.[citation needed] They see wage labour as a major, if not defining, aspect of hierarchical industrial systems. In Marxist terminology, wage labour is defined as "the mode of production where the worker sells their labour power as a commodity",[4] (and a wage labourer is one who sells their labour power.) Opponents of capitalism compare wage labour to slavery (see wage slavery). For example, Karl Marx said "The slave, together with his labour-power, was sold to his owner once for all... The [wage] labourer, on the other hand, sells his very self, and that by fractions... He [belongs] to the capitalist class; and it is for him... to find a buyer in this capitalist class." Anarcho-capitalists, minarchist capitalists and market-anarchists see the problem differently. Many explain the existence of the wage system on a monopolist legal structure, the state, which aims to make low-wage employment and innovative forms of labor trade illegal. Without wage-enforcement, they argue, many producers would find it in everyone's best interest to have a percentage-based return system, in order to align all producers' self-interests with one another. [edit] See also
[edit] Notes
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |