Contents 1 XXXXX topic template errors 2 Italian city infobox 3 TfD nomination of Template:Airlines of Ireland 4 Category:United States political leader templates 5 Template:Current_US_state_Chief_Justices 6 World Heritage Sites in Bolivia template 7 ATT: SARDANAPHALUS 8 Hungary–United States relations 9 No content in Category:Oratorios by composer templates 10 GREETINGS 11 Broken template ? 12 Croatia municipality templates 13 {{vertbox}} and {{sidebar}} 14 Deleting category redirects 15 RfD nomination of Template:Indo-Pak relations 16 {{Template group}} 17 Category:Technology and applied science infobox templates. 18 TfD nomination of Template:Slavery by location 19 Sidebar 20 TfD nomination of Template:Lists of newspapers in South America 21 TfD nomination of Template:Diplomatic missions of Europe 22 Editing Barnstar 23 TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters 24 Express large numbers as part text 25 Categories for discussion nomination of Category:"City/Town topics" templates 26 Just curious... 27 Merging of Governor and Lt. Governor templates 28 Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen 29 Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomic links 30 Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomic references 31 Speedy deletion of Template:Pritzker Prize Winners

[edit] XXXXX topic template errors

Hello, in several templates the |suffix= flag is not functioning or is putting spaces in where there shouldn't be. Could you please take a look see?

• Template:Africa topic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
• Template:Middle East topic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
• Template:Southeast Asia topic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Thanks, --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 06:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

When I added a suffix of |suffix=n cuisine to the either the Africa or Middles East topic template (can't remember which), it added a space before adding the suffix, so instead of Fooian Cuisine it came out Fooia n cuisine.

Also I discovered the problem, the templates are constructed differently. Some use the |suffix=foo and |prefix=bar flags while others just have you put |foo and |bar and will not recognize the prefix/suffix flags, although the documentation says otherwise. This involves several Continent topic templates. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 09:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Italian city infobox

Hi. Can you replace the pink map with this higher quality svg map It should display the southern islands that was the concern before Count Blofeld 12:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I mean replace Image:Regions of Italy.svg map in the infobox with the higher quality Image:Italy location map.svg The Bald One ^{White cat} 11:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes indeed! It is a good map I think as it shows all of the islands like the other and looks more professional. I was able to get in to edit the French one but Italian one is protected so I can't. Could ask User:Darwinek The Bald One ^{White cat} 11:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Airlines of Ireland

Template:Airlines of Ireland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:United States political leader templates

There is some discussion of the format of templates in Category:United States political leader templates such as {{Current Speakers of U.S. state Houses of Representatives}} and {{Current US state Chief Justices}} going on at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#State_by_state_100.2C000_population_city_and_mayors_templates. Feel free to discuss.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Current_US_state_Chief_Justices

This edit causes several problems with the template. Note that Supreme Court of California, Maryland Court of Appeals and New York Court of Appeals are examples where the template is no longer bold when the page is viewed because the template is not at the exact page location of the code. Also the latter is now linking to the wrong court. Your revision seems to be good faith, but it caused some problems. Rather than undo, I thought I would see if you want to try some sort of code augmentation.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

If you don't want to make any change I will revert to the code that had the exact page location for each court. I thought you might have some way to keep your fancy code. As far as the debate goes. Just be consistent. Any argument you make about {{Current US state Chief Justices}} should also hold for {{Current Speakers of U.S. state Houses of Representatives}}.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Same with {{Top 50 U.S. City Mayors}} and {{Current U.S. Governors}}. I.e., keep in mind the broader argument about the entire category at Category:United States political leader templates, especially templates such as {{U.S. State Secretaries of State}}, {{U.S. State Treasurers}}, and {{U.S. State Attorneys General}}.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

This weekend, I will just revert everything to the exact link.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess I will revert to the other type of navbox if I have to in order to get exact links. I try to create templates with exact links so that they are bold when placed on a page with a link in the template.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I confess. I do not follow page moves and renames, but I do try to make everything bold at the time of template construction. It makes using templates easier.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] World Heritage Sites in Bolivia template

I just created the article Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos which I would like to have appear in the template. Since I am not familiar with editing templates, I wonder if you could put it there. It should replace "Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos". Thanks bamse (talk) 16:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ATT: SARDANAPHALUS

its user kridian here. disputes on neurofunk article again. the main problem is that neurofunk is not 100% defined as the major subgenre "techstep" is since its still in an infant, close to abstract period. if it grows with more artists joining the style with the same sound it can reach a clear definition in the future. but i know i wrote the best version yet, hated by some and loved by others because it go popular, scoring a B. disputes are coming from fans with different points of view and too many of them willing to push their favorite artists while i was cold and neutral about it. many of those neurofunk artists that i wrote about dont interest me, musically speaking but fact is, they do neurofunk music indeed. the sound is growing to the point of artists imitating the pioneers and sounding like cliche yet, this is how a genre is born. if these guys who are adding doubts to an article that clearly got a B score can win, they will simply write their view about it - one of them writes mainly about football - and neurofunk will go down like the great, late jazz fusion article did. i try to keep my interest and im always checking and upgrading it but now im beginning new music projects and will be busier than ever, besides the fact that i actually quit buying neurofunk. actually, the artists who will be doing my logo sound design happens to be PHACE (check neurofunk article) who are prominent neurofunk artists yet, when i added them as important new artists here about 3 years ago, they were rejected by some vandals simply because these people didnt like their music. now they got kind of big in the scene, but 3 to 4 years ago i was right by adding them to the article. probably the only way to go with this is to lock it for a while until vandalism stops or simply let it go down in quality the way jazz fusion did. but now i have to start writing for a new music company and wont have the time to control the quality of this article anymore. best version yet is the one where i highlighted "UK" (dec. 10th, 2008).

check history of the article to see what they did and their claims. make your own judgement.

take it easy, rob Kridian

[edit] Hungary–United States relations

I checked your cool edits in Hungary–United States relations! Good work. I saw you worked a lot in this english wikipedia. Write here information if you have time: Hungary–United States relations . Thanks you work! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No content in Category:Oratorios by composer templates

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Oratorios by composer templates, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Oratorios by composer templates has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Oratorios by composer templates, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR!--BobClive (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Broken template ?

Hi

I think someone has broken one of the templates, I have sent them a message asking them if they meant to do it,and if the want help to fix it Should I give them a day or so to sort it out/reply, or should I pass the details on ?

Cheers--Chaosdruid (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Croatia municipality templates

The related Category:Croatia municipality templates has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for Discussion page.

--Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] {{vertbox}} and {{sidebar}}

I've suggested that we're better merging these templates before they see too much deployment. Thoughts? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting category redirects

Do you have any objection if I nominate the categories listed on User:R'n'B/Navbox category redirects for deletion? I ask because it looks like you redirected most (if not all) of these categories as part of the reorganization of the template categories. The redirects no longer seem to serve any useful purpose, and I'd like to get rid of them to reduce clutter, but I thought I'd check with you first to see if this would cause any problems. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of Template:Indo-Pak relations

I have nominated Template:Indo-Pak relations (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Cerejota (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] {{Template group}}

Adding the coord template to this group breaks the display of the coordinates. Please avoid adding it. -- User:Docu

[edit] Category:Technology and applied science infobox templates.

hi. it was suggested you may help with this. i noticed that in this category: [Category:Technology and applied science infobox templates], there are article pages as well as template pages. i cant seem to get the article pages de listed here, and cant find the category tags on those pages. the template category is thus listed as a category for the articles, despite its being a category for wikipedia editors only.im new to wikipedia, and so am not surprised im stumped with this complex problem. i think the problem will be self evident to you. if you need more info, ask please. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Slavery by location

Template:Slavery by location has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 00:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sidebar

Yo, Sardanaphalus. Any chance you can work your collapsable-sections magic on {{History of Ukraine}}? Also, the |expanded= function does not seem to be working for {{Anarchism sidebar}} (example). Thanks for your attention, Skomorokh 21:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Lists of newspapers in South America

Template:Lists of newspapers in South America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Diplomatic missions of Europe

Template:Diplomatic missions of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Editing Barnstar

		100,000 Edits
		I, Bugboy52.4, award you for reaching 100,000 edits according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits generated 11:45 pm, 24 February 2009. Keep up the good work!________________________________________________________________

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Template:911ct, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  08:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Express large numbers as part text

I see that you created the category "Wikipedia formatting and function templates", and thought you might be able to take or pass on this suggestion.

The Astronomical Unit is approx 150, 000, 000 km.

Using {{convert|150000000|km|mi}}

gives 150,000,000 kilometres (93,000,000 mi)

can it have an additional option to give the 000,000s as millions? So that it would give

150 million kilometres (93 million miles). HarryAlffa (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Categories for discussion nomination of Category:"City/Town topics" templates

Category:"City/Town topics" templates, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 07:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Just curious...

...but I wondered why my templates page was on your main page? Remember (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Merging of Governor and Lt. Governor templates

Pardon me for asking nine months after the fact, but I just noticed this edit. I see no discussion at Template talk:Governors of Illinois or Template talk:ILLtGovernors, so I'm assuming that this move was made as part of a general pattern for all states. Except that I don't see that in the couple that I've looked at. So I'm left with a few questions.

• Is this, in fact, part of a general pattern that I have missed?
• If so, where was the discussion, so that I may try to understand why this is being done.
• If it is not something that was generally discussed, and you acted on your own (which, of course, is perfectly fine), could you explain your reasoning to me?

I just don't understand the benefit from this, so I'm trying to understand it. Cheers. Unschool 01:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

Sardanaphalus, an article I recently created, Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, has been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. Please take the time to weigh in and stop its deletion. Thanks again for all your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia! Caponer (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomic links

Template:Taxonomic links has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Eastmain (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomic references

Template:Taxonomic references has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Eastmain (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Pritzker Prize Winners

A tag has been placed on Template:Pritzker Prize Winners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Elekhh (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)