This talk page is automatically archived by Miszabot. Any sections older than 10 days are automatically archived to User talk:J Greb/Archive Dec 2009. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Contents 1 History of Superman 2 FYI 3 RFCU Asgardian draft 4 A note 5 Asgardian RFC/U

[edit] History of Superman

In case you were wondering what I was was doing last night... I saw (in huggle) a large amount of text added, I assumed (correctly) that it was a cut and paste from elsewhere, I checked in Google, and got a match, but as I was composing my CopyVio warning message in twinkle, I saw the CC license on the other site, which meant it was not a CopyVio, so my only option was to rollback. The subject is not my field to make any decisions on as to if it needed to stay or not, so I had to leave it to those in the know to decide - and I see you did decide.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] FYI

There is a Cfd about a category you are connected with. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_13#Category:Comics_ambox_templates. Debresser (talk) 09:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Please revisit Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_13#Category:Comics_ambox_templates, because I have added a related category to the nomination. Debresser (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Likewise I have nominated Category:Comics genre cleanup, being that it is empty and not in use by any template (to the best of my knowledge. Debresser (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

That one is, hopefully, going to be a "rarely used" category to round up articles when a change is made in the {{Comics infobox sec/genrecat}} sub-template's fields. There was a CfD related to Furry comics and the "Furry" field needed to be fixed. It has been, I just never got to the "clean up clean up". - J Greb (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll remove the speedy nomination then. Thank you for your reply. Debresser (talk) 01:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at what I made of Category:Comics genre cleanup, and let me know if that is to your liking. Debresser (talk) 01:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Looks good - J Greb (talk) 01:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Good. We strive to please. Debresser (talk) 04:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RFCU Asgardian draft

Since you have been contacted by other users about Asgardian in the past, I thought that you may have some instances to add to BOZ's draft on a list of Asgardian's continuous offenses. Any help would be appreciated. Dave (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] A note

Greetings. I saw your comment here [1], and agree. A in-depth study of the Edit Summaries for Mjolnir and Dormammu, will show I've been very accommodating, and tried to help where possible, even over small issues such as phrasing and sources.

Unfortunately, Dave has admitted to having a medical condition : [2], which may be effecting his behaviour and the need to argue over even the smallest of points: [3]. There is also the issues of his comments, which you have also tried to address : [4]. Dave appears to "slip" from time to time, and goes too far [5]; [6]. When Dave has the bit between his teeth, it really can get out of hand : [7].

I like Dave, but am worried about him. The mass canvassing of opinion on my editing (a la above) is also a concern. At the same time, I can't in good faith let erroneous material better suited to a fan site become canon on Wikipedia.

Is this a first, and how would such a matter be handled? Tenebrae had this to say [8]. What are your thoughts?

Regards

Asgardian (talk) 04:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

The entire problem here is that you do not "bend backwards" in the slightest, which would be to try to incorporate new accurate references, regardless if these contradict others, and to simply let accuracy-adjusted facts be, but rearrange the structure/flow for improvements. You cannot dispute that I have been actively trying to do this for your own edits, or recurrently written multiple outline adjustments in attempts for compromise. If you would correspond with the same, rather than revert to the same thing over and over, and be truthful in what you say when describing the specifics in your content I would not have had a problem, but previously you swiftly diverged from this agreement between us. I also find it distasteful that you would try to use the medical condition as weapon. Dave (talk) 19:40, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Asgardian RFC/U

Hi there. I was wondering if you would help me finish up the RFC/U regarding User:Asgardian. I'm going to put the RFC into place before the end of the year, so it would really be great if you could provide any help you are able to give. What I need most are diffs displaying the disputed behavior. I have some already here, but could use some more. I mean just a list of diffs to put in the first five or so categories I listed there, as I already have more than enough illustrative examples. Anything that you think is edit warring (mutiple similar edits to the same article in the span of a few days), incivility, inaccurate edit summaries, or other similar behavioral problems. List them on the RFCU talk page - just the diffs is all I need, because I want people reading the RFC to be able to draw their own conclusions.

Also, I have come up with a desired outcome and a description of the case based on the comments that have been gathered, and I would appreciate any responses to that on the talk page.

Thanks! BOZ (talk) 05:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi there,

I'm just letting you know that the Asgardian RFC/U has begun.

Also, you made statements pertaining to the case, and I tried to reflect all the major points in my summary. If you feel there is something you wanted to be said that I did not cover sufficiently (or accurately enough to reflect your viewpoint), you may post an "Involved user view" below Asgardian's response section to elaborate. You may wish to copy, whole or in part, any previous statements you have made (with or without diffs or links) into such a new section as you desire.

Thank you for your participation. BOZ (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)