Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Contents 1 File copyright problem with File:Fellowship-combat-assign.jpg 2 Paul Jaquays 3 Confused 4 Game development being vandalized

[edit] File copyright problem with File:Fellowship-combat-assign.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fellowship-combat-assign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Added copyright status. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 19:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Jaquays

Thanks for the read-through and fix on the video game credits table - I wasn't sure whether to cite all platforms or the first/primary development platform. Decided that getting the first cut for the article online seemed like a good idea, in the end, given how long that had been on my queue for! Cheers & Best wishes, David. Harami2000 (talk) 03:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. It was a fun little 10 minute project. Yeah, sometimes a first cut is more important than waiting and trying to get something perfect up. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Confused

I'm a bit confused as to why you reordered my reply to StrangeAttractor in Talk:Infocom. I was replying directly to him/her and not you. I've never seen anyone object as you did. Frotz (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Because my response was a direct reply to his last comment. You hijacked my meaning by placing your response above mine. I understand you were replying to his comment, and that's fine. Just do it below what others—including myself—have already posted. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Game development being vandalized

{{adminhelp}}

An anon user is vandalizing the game development article. He appears to get his jollies by inserting the same outrageous remarks into the article. Can the article be semi-protected or in some other manner protected for a while until he gets bored and goes away? Thanks. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 16:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not an admin, but I am taking a look into it now, and may request page protection.--MWOAP (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Request for page protection has been made, all offending users have been warned. Tim1357 (talk) 16:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Page has been semi-protected by an admin for 10 days. That is all I could get. --MWOAP (talk) 16:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to everyone! I always appreciate the help. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 17:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)