User talk:Emperor Information & User talk:Emperor Links at HealthHaven.com

This talk page is automatically archived by Miszabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User_talk:Emperor/Archive 2009. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives
/Archive 2003 /Archive 2005 /Archive 2006 /Archive 2007 /Archive 2008 /Archive 2009

[edit] IOM infobox

Just following up on this...

I've move the template to a live page - {{Infobox comics in other media}} and placed it on most of the IOM articles.

I've also gotten some feed back on my talk if you're interested.

- ~~``

[edit] Carol Danvers Death?

I changed the text stating the death of the character, as it is more plausible to assume from the interview and from her addition to the New Avengers cast, that Carol will fake her death. Either way, we do not know for sure the state of her during dark reign, and the source interview is inconclusive. I changed the text to reflect what we know for sure.

[edit] More minor stuff-questions

1) Doom (film) has a character, Carmack, that people keep saying is named for a real person, a programmer for the Doom game. But since Carmack the fictional character is an evil man, I've been deleting the references. Am I right to do so? It's one thing to say 'Funky Flashman is based on Stan Lee's mannerisms' when Funky is a fictional slave trader but a name is a name.

2) The Nathan Thompson Show. Kinda got out of control there re: history so I'm throwing it out with no commentary.

[edit] FYI

Please revisit Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_13#Category:Comics_ambox_templates, because I have added a related category to the nomination. Debresser (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_17#Category:Ambox_templates for the folow-up to your suggestion. Debresser (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Steampunk, et al.

I know that you are not as active on the Steampunk, and related, articles of late, but I could use some advice or at least some thoughts about a situation that is brewing. If you take a look at this exchange on my talk page, you will see what I am dealing with. When it comes to most topics in the larger "steampunk subculture" I am generally clueless (by choice), so questions of notability might elude me. But, there are basic issues of verifiability, referencing, and just plain good, encyclopedic content. If you would not mind throwing in your two cents worth, I'd appreciate it. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 02:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Well I can't claim to be too knowledgeable about the lifestylers and the Steampunk subculture (as my interest is largely in the media stemming from my already existing interest in early sci-fi, and my attention has wandered back that way a bit recently) but be sure to give me a nudge if there is anything I can do - I have a lot of pages on my watchlist and can always miss gathering storm clouds. (Emperor (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC))

Yes, my attention and interest has always been on the literature, not the subculture. Still, the policy issues are fairly clear, I think. I appreciate your help. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 04:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rachel Pollack

Looks strongly like our blocked editor is back at it. I'd appreciate you casting an editorial eye towards Rachel Pollack now and again. The previous round was pretty disturbing to her. I think the block's expired. Anniepoo (talk) 01:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Strange Tales et al

Indeed. Thanks for the head's up. I'm heading over to Leon Lazarus, since an interview with him just ran in Alter Ego.

Sorry to hear about the issue just above. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, you beat me to it! :-) --Tenebrae (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Asgardian RFC/U

Hi there. I was wondering if you would help me finish up the RFC/U regarding User:Asgardian. I'm going to put the RFC into place before the end of the year, so it would really be great if you could provide any help you are able to give. What I need most are diffs displaying the disputed behavior. I have some already here, but could use some more. I mean just a list of diffs to put in the first five or so categories I listed there, as I already have more than enough illustrative examples. Anything that you think is edit warring (mutiple similar edits to the same article in the span of a few days), incivility, inaccurate edit summaries, or other similar behavioral problems. List them on the RFCU talk page - just the diffs is all I need, because I want people reading the RFC to be able to draw their own conclusions.

Also, I have come up with a desired outcome and a description of the case based on the comments that have been gathered, and I would appreciate any responses to that on the talk page.

Thanks! BOZ (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Yep, that's basically what's needed. This doesn't require the comprehensiveness of an ArbCom case, but definitely a healthy-sized "evidence" section should do the job. BOZ (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi there,

I'm just letting you know that the Asgardian RFC/U has begun.

Also, you made statements pertaining to the case, and I tried to reflect all the major points in my summary. If you feel there is something you wanted to be said that I did not cover sufficiently (or accurately enough to reflect your viewpoint), you may post an "Involved user view" below Asgardian's response section to elaborate. You may wish to copy, whole or in part, any previous statements you have made (with or without diffs or links) into such a new section as you desire.

Thank you for your participation. BOZ (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Advice please

I'd like your advice on Dana Perino, the whole 'edit-war' dispute has gone completely down the 'what the heck is going on' path. Details on talk page. Lots42 (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Contents