Contents 1 Reptilian humanoids 2 Regarding this 3 Barnstar 4 Reptilian aliens 5 Happy Thanksgiving!

[edit] Reptilian humanoids

Don't mind me, I'm just anal retentive :-) Serendi^podous 00:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding this

Hello! Might you consider allowing for a "merge" rather than a bolded "delete", i.e. so that we can make use of what I list at Talk:Battles_of_macrohistorical_importance_involving_invasions_of_Europe#Merge_offer and in the section below? Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 18:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Not really sure what the target would be. Artw (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for keeping an open-mind. We could redirect to List of battles and merge the following:

consider Battles_of_macrohistorical_importance_involving_invasions_of_Europe#Battle_of_Vienna and Battle_of_Lepanto_(1571)#Religious_significance. Hanson's quotation that "To sixteenth century Christians, the sudden muster and vast size of the Christian fleet at Lepanto were proof of Christ to resist the Muslim onslaught" demonstrates the religious significance of the victory to the comabtants and would help flesh in that short section of the main articles. The entries on this list contain various such examples that indeed are not duplicative of the main battle articles and for which we can actually augment those battle articles, notice references that appear in this article at Battles_of_macrohistorical_importance_involving_invasions_of_Europe#Notes, but not the individual ones:

Battle_of_Thermopylae#References: Grote and Grant from this article could be used in the battle article, which does not cite them.

Battle_of_the_Metaurus#References: The battle article has few references. The content cited from Davis in the list article is different from the citation in the battle article. Thus, this and possibly the other reference from this list would add new content/sourcing to the battle article.

Battle_of_Chalons#Notes: The list article uses Fuller and Davis, which again, the battle article does not. Merging these items would certainly strengthen the sections of the battle article on importance/aftermath.

Battle of Toulouse (721) contains NO internally cited statements, whereas the list article features SIX citations that can be used in the battle article, thereby taking an article on a major battle with no footnotes and adding at least six to it.

Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I hereby award this barnstar to Artw for saving Human disguise with constructive edits to that fine article along with resolute, well reasoned and above all LOLish contributions to the AfD debate! FeydHuxtable (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I too am pleased to see this article saved! Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Reptilian aliens

Coincidentally, I was just looking these articles over as I was looking at Dinosauroid. I'm unsure gutting the reptilian humanoids article was the way forward but there is now a reptilian aliens article. I'm still playing catch-up after being away for a week but will see what I can rummage together.

Amusing sidenote: I have David Icke's home phone number!! (Emperor (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC))

[edit] Happy Thanksgiving!

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)