User talk:Akhilleus Information & User talk:Akhilleus Links at HealthHaven.com

Archives
one two (Mar 21 2006-July 11 2006) three (July 20 2006-Sept 24 2006) four (Sept 30 2006-Oct 31 2006) five six seven (May 2007) eight (June 2007) nine (July 2007) ten (Aug 2007) eleven (Sept 2007) twelve (Oct 2007) thirteen (Nov 2007) fourteen (Dec 2007-Feb 2008) fifteen (Mar 2008)

[edit] Human suit recreated as Human disguise

This is a notice to all who participated in the recent AfD of Human suit, here, that resulted in a consensus for delete. This article has been recreated as "Human disguise", and has been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human disguise. Thank you. Verbal chat 21:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] How about this

You don't like me saying you meat puppet. Fine. No one is supposed to like being labeled with anything negative. I will stop saying it publicly and keep it restricted to evidentiary proceeding if it ever comes up (such as ArbCom) if you can do one of the following:

1. Provide a diff showing where you had a major disagreement with Folantin, Dbachmann, Antandrus, or Moreschi.

2. Provide one individual that I go around and always support and I have never had a major disagreement with them.

- Ottava Rima (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't intend to do either of these things. By calling me a meatpuppet, you're essentially saying that I don't think for myself and my opinion is worthless. I'm not going to bother to respond to that charge; it's enough to point out that you're accusing me of a major (and blockable) policy violation without ever once providing credible evidence. If you would simply stop spouting such drivel, the chances are I would ignore you almost completely as our interests are different enough that we rarely cross paths. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I honestly don't believe you speak for yourself only because I have never seen it and I go by what I am able to see for myself. If you can provide some examples of it, you will earn my respect. I have a reputation for not going with the crowd. I have stood against the bans of those who have attacked me, I have supported at RfA those who were opposed to me and opposed those who were my friends, I put my neck on the line for an individual at an ArbCom case who has not once ever supported my FAC habits, and when I disagree with people I work with I have made it clear. If you can show anything in the same manner, even something small, it would verify that you are far better than how I have described you, and I will be wrong and strike my comments about your actions accordingly. If I refuse to do that, then you can use this post as evidence that I deserve to be blocked. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

"I honestly don't believe you speak for yourself only because I have never seen it"--I'm sorry, but I don't want to have a conversation with a person who is being this disrespectful. Please don't post here anymore. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry if I came across as disrespectful. I was hoping that the sentence would read as revealing my own flaws and inabilities as opposed to saying that you were flawed. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] You may be interested in this RFC/U

You were mentioned (though not named) in Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dbachmann_4, because you were involved in the discussion at User talk:Dbachmann#Telugu. You may be interested in commenting or endorsing at some point. I'm letting all of those who took part in the earlier discussion know about this, regardless of position.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 23:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Meatpuppetry

At last: there I am! I was getting way lonely over here... a one-woman conspiracy is a sad thing. [/me shelters pathetically under Bishzilla's marquee-size tinfoil hat.] Tell me, are you my meatpuppet, or am I yours? Bishonen | talk 00:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC).

It doesn't really matter, because "ArbCom has already ruled that when there is meatpuppetry, the individual actions apply to the whole". We're all the same--a univocal collective. By the way, this brings up something I've been meaning to talk to you about--you are way behind on your disruption quota. I don't think you've done anything to destroy Wikipedia this whole month. Please start abusing the wiki again, or we may have to kick you out of our meatpuppetry group. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ha. You think not? You must have missed where I had my friends actively trying to get rid of Jennavecia! [1] And where I actively (the new favourite word, I think) harassed people defending--enter dark horse contestant--ta ra: Malleus Fatuorum! Add these excellent exploits to your "plots to destroy the wiki" if you wish, and, above all, bow down to my superior corruption! Bishonen | talk 17:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC).

[edit] Sorry

I am sorry for anything I have said that may have hurt you. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the apology. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I have struck the section dealing with you from the proposals - in retrospect, no matter what perceived offenses I may have seen, none of them are great enough to continue pursuing them to this date nor would it be better to dwell on the past in that manner. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Please join discussion

Could you please join the Christ Myth Theory discussion here Talk:Christ_myth_theory#Vandalism_by_User:Eugeneacurry_.28Relating_to_Holocaust_comments.29. Is it about the comments Eugeneacurry made regarding the holocaust, which you have previously undone (like many editors have). I would appreciate it if you could state your reasons for your undo (you said the holocaust was not relevant to this article) to help resolve it. That user has repeatedly vandalized the article with his own opinions, and it definately needs fixing. – TigerTails talk 14:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)