Urgent messages by email please. Astronominov 04:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Contents 1 The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009 2 The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009 3 The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009 4 List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming 5 The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009 6 Robert Garside 7 The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009 8 What's your email ID ? 9 Song Kexi 10 RfA thankspam 11 The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009 12 BLPN - Blacklisting due to BLP issues? 13 RfA Thanks 14 The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009 15 The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009 16 RfA Thanks 17 The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009 18 Wikipedia:WikiCup/2010 Signups

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit] List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

On 23 Oct you mentioned that you might comment on this dispute [1]. This dispute is still being discussed in a newer BLPN entry here if you're still interested in commenting. --Ronz (talk) 03:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the debate is over, so my opinion there will probably be redundant. I read this message a bit late, so I couldn't participate. Thanks for informing me though, I appreciate it. Astronominov 16:39, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit] Robert Garside

Robert Garside , Hi and thanks for offering to rewrite the section a bit, I have moved the section to the talkpage in readiness, I am available to discuss any issues but my writing skills are shall we say medium , imo, the section needs trimming of a fair bit and leaving the strongest points from the strongest citations, feel free to contact me, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

By the way, no worries, no pressure, no time limits. Off2riorob (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, that looks better, there has been some more discussion at the BLP noticeboard, worth a read for your reference. Off2riorob (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit] What's your email ID ?

Pritesh Gupta (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Please click on the "E-mail this user" link on the toolbar on your left. Thanks. Aditya Ex Machina 09:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Song Kexi

Ummm... Every other article by User:Moon Gallery got speedily deleted (perhaps it doesn't help that they seem to be the owner of www.moongallery.com?) Check out User talk:Moon Gallery. Shem (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Although I'll grant that they may, in fact, be notable. Shem (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I see. But since there's a valid claim for notability, A7 is not an option. I've nommed it for deletion anyway. Feel free to participate in the AfD. Aditya Ex Machina 15:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks - I'll drop by the AfD. Shem (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thankspam

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit] BLPN - Blacklisting due to BLP issues?

Regarding your reply, "I don't see why not, though the edit filter could also be used for this." I'm not sure what you mean by "edit filter." Something other than XLinkBot I'm guessing. --Ronz (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Apologies. I meant the spam blacklist. It can be used to block URLs (generally used by spammers). If the problem gets out of hand, and if it's difficult to monitor with your bot, just post there. Aditya Ex Machina 06:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. --Ronz (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RfA Thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 51 supports, 4 opposes, and 3 neutrals.

MrKIA11 (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit] RfA Thanks

[edit] The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiCup/2010 Signups

I have removed your "flag", as I am afraid it's not valid. Flags must represent a real current or historical place, and be public domain or under a free license. You're welcome to choose another, or let one be assigned at the start of the competition. J Milburn (talk) 23:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Regardless of the letter of the rules, Nazi Germany is not permitted. It's already been denied to someone else. It's really not appropriate. J Milburn (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't think that's reasonable, but if you insist.. Aditya Ex Machina 23:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)