| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
No Blur * Dr. Kenneth E. Maller and Great Vision - Computer Users noblur.com | BMT SUPPORT ONLINE ====> User Survey bmtsupport.org | End-User Agreements suttergould.org | Edit User princetoncme.com |
Pages: User page – Pages started – Reviewed content – Contribs by Project – Photo Gallery – Stuff – Barnstars – DYKs – ITNs – To-do list – Userboxes – talk – bio – header – FOUR WP:CHICAGO – WP:CHIFTD – WP:LOTD – WP:LOTM Recently listed good articles: Three Days Grace — Dion Phaneuf — Dick Padden — Jack the Ripper — SMS Scharnhorst — Charles Eaton (RAAF officer) — Asian House Martin — Royal society — Mikoyan-Gurevich I-250 — Mystery Train (film) — Indefatigable class battlecruiser — Confessions Tour — Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak — Central Morocco Tamazight — Ring Line (Oslo) The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are: Pat Condell • Pilot (Twin Peaks) • Ellen Harvelle • Brad Follmer • Alvin Kersh
To the best of my knowledge, I am English Wikipedia's most prolific reviewed-class (WP:FA, WP:FL, WP:GA) encyclopedic content contributor in terms of total number of reviewed articles for which I was a significant contributor. I do believe others may have contributed more quality encyclopedic content than myself. For example, a prolific WP:DYK producer such as User:Cbl62 may have contributed more quality encyclopedic content without having it reviewed. Nonetheless, since I am claiming credit for over 2% of all good articles on wikipedia (to the right) you may want to assess my involvement in these pages using this tool. You should notice that I am a major editorial contributor to each claimed GA. I do not claim articles where I was merely the nominator such as Hillary Rodham Clinton or articles where a few dozen edits that I have made aren't significant in the context of a highly edited article such as Tiger Woods or Britney Spears. I also exclude articles where I do not feel my supporting role impacted the overall takeaway on the article such as Ralph Heikkinen or John Maulbetsch. I also excluded articles where my important lasting contributions were to the talk page such as Rickey Henderson. However, since I have mostly good articles I am far down the lists at WP:WBFAN and WP:WBFLN. This is largely my own fault. Generally, when choosing between allocating my time between an article that is extremely deficient in (if not devoid of) encyclopedic content and an article rich in encyclopedic content in need of stylistic refinements, I choose to contribute my time to the former. In fact, in addition to the six WP:FOUR awards I have earned, I have taken 81 articles from being non-existent through the WP:DYK process and then to GA status. This means that if you would like to contribute to WP:FAs, my GA list above is fertile soil that just needs some tilling. Feel quite welcome to clean up one of my GAs above. There is one editor who has probably surpassed my total reviewed content count if you use a less strict claim method that includes nominations on behalf of editors who are not interested in the process. Here is my overall Article review record. This is how I have allocated my wikipedia editing time during my last 45,000 edits. I seem to be moving up the List of Wikipedians by number of edits. It is now possible to see daily page view statistics for wikipedia pages. In the cases of the more recent WP:DYK nominations, you can determine how many page views and article received while it was linked to the main page by checking its discussion page to see the DYK date and using this page view tool. Among the articles I have taken to WP:GA level are five articles which I created because I found they were notable subjects whose articles had previously been deleted (John W. Rogers, Jr., Manny Harris, Nate Parker, PokerTracker, Toni Preckwinkle and Tory Burch), and two which have survived a WP:AFD challenges after my initial page creation (Thomas Wilcher and María del Luján Telpuk). I have also been largely responsible for raising the following articles to GA-Class as a major editor: Chicago Race Riot of 1919, which had been restored through WP:DRV after deletion before my involvement, and Justine Ezarik and Jennifer Brunner, both of which had been recreated after multiple deletions before my involvement.
[edit] Tigers on my userpage (feel free to add "free use" tiger)If you appreciate my work above leave a tiger below. If you have trouble finding one that you don't see below go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tiger and click on any of the subspecies to see more images.
[edit] WP:CHICAGOI have assumed the Manager/Director duties of the Chicago WikiProject as well as the Coordinator duties for the CHICOTW and Assessment departments of the project. Below are current statistics for the project, and here is a project log. Follow the bot tagging for WP:WPChi here. In April 2007, before Elkman helped us set up {{ChicagoWikiProject}}, SatyrTN helped us add this tag with his bot to articles and Speciate donated inordinate amounts of time parameterizing the template on talk page after talk page our project looked like this. Here is a sumary of the current state of the project.
[edit] External Links
[edit] Selected Photo ContributionsFor a more complete gallery of My Photo Contributions
[edit] The places
[edit] NotesCategories: Wikipedia Featured Article contributors | Wikipedia Featured list contributors | Wikipedia Featured picture contributors | Wikipedia Featured Portal contributors | Wikipedia Good Article contributors | Wikipedia Good Article reviewers | Wikipedia Good Topic contributors | Wikipedia Did you know contributors | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |