36°51′14″S 174°46′06″E / 36.853870336523°S 174.7683620452881°E / -36.85387033652268; 174.7683620452881

Wikipedia:Babel
en This user is a native speaker of English. ja-1 この利用者は少しだけ日本語を話すことができます。
Search user languages

Userboxes This user has a page on the Wikimedia Commons. This user is from Auckland. UoA This user studies at the University of Auckland. This user has been on Wikipedia for 3 years, 11 months, and 7 days. [[red]] This editor adds or leaves in useful red links to encourage content creation, especially by new editors. 10,000+ This user has made over 10,000 contributions to Wikipedia articles. This user has created over 30 articles on Wikipedia. incl This user is an inclusionist. mer This editor is a mergist.

It is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. - Charles Darwin

Contents 1 About me 2 Schedule 3 Common mistakes 3.1 See also sections 3.2 Headings Should Not Be Capitalized 3.3 Lead sections 3.4 The tragedy of the Commons 3.5 Citations 3.6 Talk pages 3.7 Reverting vandalism 4 Thoughts about Wikipedia 4.1 Inclusionism 4.2 Ideas to improve Wikipedia 4.2.1 The need for organized page maintenance 4.2.2 Article requests 5 Want a dictionary definition? 6 Current work and to do 6.1 WikiProjects 6.2 Recent contributions 6.3 Some articles to create 6.4 Other ideas for articles... 6.5 Notes/to do 7 Other projects I contribute to

[edit] About me

I'm Richard Wilde, an undergraduate student from New Zealand doing a Bachelor of Science majoring in biology at the University of Auckland. I'm here to help fight in the War on Ignorance (including, of course, my own) and to make the internet not suck, or at least to suck somewhat less.

I'm interested in many subjects, including but not limited to philosophy and science. I'm currently working on a range of ecology, ethology and evolutionary biology related topics in my spare time, and my editing activities involve assessing articles, adding to do lists (I feel articles are a bit like a headless chicken without one), and requesting, creating or expanding articles themselves. As a Wikipedian I feel I can never, never do enough.

Parallel to Wikipedia, I'm also interested in making old public domain materials available online, as well helping to build a free audio/visual media library (i.e. Wikimedia Commons).

If anyone needs me to look up a journal article or something similar, I have access to a range of databases through the university library system.

I'm also thinking about the idea of creating a Wikipedia club at the university. I'm not sure how much interest there would be, though it might boost the number of UoA Wikipedians here a bit if we can generate some interest in it. Might be something I could start next year or the one after...

[edit] Schedule

I will probably be contributing to Wikipedia a bit more now that university is over for a while, though not necessarily a great deal more. I'll probably be doing postgraduate study in biology next year.

[edit] Common mistakes

There are some frequent mistakes I constantly fix, which I'll list here as I come across or think of them. Hopefully someone reading this will learn from them.

[edit] See also sections

These sections should seldom contain links already in the article, especially those linked in the first sentence. The see also section is a place to link related topics that wouldn't be out of place linked in the text of the article, but which currently are not present. Listing half the article's internal links again is of no help. Also, please keep lists alphabetical. I often leave the same message in brief as a hidden comment simply because this happens so often.

[edit] Headings Should Not Be Capitalized

The above heading should of course read 'Headings should not be capitalized'. The same goes for article names. A common mistake among new users, though I seldom see experienced users fixing it.

[edit] Lead sections

Too often I see articles with a tiny introduction or lead section. An article's lead should be a concise summary of the whole article. There are some articles with overly large leads, but more often they are too short. The length should be proportional to the length of the full article, so while a brief article can get away with only a one paragraph lead, a detailed one should have a lead of 3, 4 or even 5 paragraphs. Unfortunately even some GA or 'A' class articles suffer from this issue.

[edit] The tragedy of the Commons

Please upload to Wikimedia Commons. The number of free images that could be moved there is staggering, and seems to be growing larger by the day. The template {{un:c}} is useful for new users.

Also, please link to Commons whenever possible (use {{commons}} or {{commonscat}}. You don't have to look far to find an article that is screaming out for a link to a useful Commons gallery or category to be added.

[edit] Citations

Citations come after punctuation,^[1] not before.^[2] The previous sentence is a good example.

[edit] Talk pages

Talk pages are only for discussion of improving the article. This means that off topic material should be removed from talk pages. If you see off-topic fluff floating around, please, do as I do and remove it.

[edit] Reverting vandalism

There is little point reverting vandalism if you are reverting to a revision that itself contains vandalism. Often I see someone revert one IPs vandalism by merely rolling back to a vandalized version by another IP. And guess what usually happens next? Yup, people assume everything has been fixed and the vandalism stays put. If you see this happening, please find the reverter and explain what has happened. Bots do it too; there's not much we can do about this besides closely watching articles. Often, this doesn't happen though (see below).

[edit] Thoughts about Wikipedia

I think the internet would be a lot better if it was more like Wikipedia. Many sites would be much neater if they were wikis or took on some of the characteristics of a wiki (wiki hybrids, if you like). I am both impressed with the progress of Wiki(p/m)edia but at the same time disappointed at the slow development of some important things given the large number of people in the world who could contribute here and at our sister projects.

[edit] Inclusionism

I'm an inclusionist both in terms of how notable an article has to be to have a Wikipedia article and what type of pages we should have on Wikipedia (i.e. I'm less inclined to say "Wikipedia is not a...")

[edit] Ideas to improve Wikipedia

[edit] The need for organized page maintenance

See User:Richard001/Maintenance for an essay about the need for organized maintenance of Wikipedia pages.

[edit] Article requests

The Wikipedia assessment scheme describes how articles can be placed in certain classes - stub, B-class etc. But what about articles that don't exist? I'm not suggesting that we assess the quality of such articles, but rather I think we should pay more attention to article requests. I think WikiProjects are the best way to handle requests. More WikiProjects need to get involved with requests, and in a bigger way. Requests pages need to be refined and improved, sorted etc. Requests should also be assessed in the sense of "yes, this is a good request, we should have an article on it" or "no, there is already an article on this topic/it isn't notable etc" (i.e. there would be three classes of non-existent article: non-requested, new requests and approved requests. Of course, some non-requested articles may still be article worthy, even urgently needed!) Request lists should include assessment of how important it is to any relevant project(s) (and thus how urgent a request it is) and, if possible, reliable sources which could be used to create such an article. It is important for projects to look not only at what articles they have and how good they are, but what articles they should have, how many there are, and how important they are.

[edit] Want a dictionary definition?

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but if you want a definition just type "wikt:" before the word, e.g. "wikt:candor", and you'll be taken to the Wiktionary entry.

[edit] Current work and to do

[edit] WikiProjects

I am listed as a member of the following WikiProjects. I work on a range of articles and assess almost anything, but these are the ones I'm most involved with:

• Biology (this project isn't widely watchlisted enough, perhaps because of its late inception, but is an important place to discuss matters that pertain to more than one subproject)
  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Animals (esp. animal behaviour)
    • Birds (not especially knowledgeable on birds, but work with bird images a bit)
      • Newsletter: Audio, own photos, Flickr permissions, public domain images
    • Arthropods
      • Lepidoptera (working on Papilio dardanus)
  • Genetics
• Books
• New Zealand
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media

[edit] Recent contributions

I plan to work more on making stubs into non-stubs in future, maybe including some of my own.

Full list: User:Richard001/Articles I have created

• Papilio dardanus (butterfly) - start class
• Categories: Category:Books by Matt Ridley, Category:Evolutionary biology journals; Category:Books about evolution (needs to be populated)

[edit] Some articles to create

Feel free to beat me to creating these!

• Exploitation (ecology)
• Condition (ecology)
• Resource (ecology) - three highly important ecology articles
• Religion and morality
• Mineral resources

[edit] Other ideas for articles...

• Philosophy of evolution(ary biology), or philosophy and evolution (including evolution and ethics, aesthetics, epistemology)

[edit] Notes/to do

• Read WP:NPOV again.
• R/K selection theory within a species
• Expand on argument by analogy (or analogical reasoning)
• Empty Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of mammals
• Photo for Francis Darwin - copyright status of the one at CDOL?
• Possible AfDs: Evolutionary Biology (textbook)
• Categorization - hidden items and better navigation?
• Uploading images of dead people - should be an option when uploading, rather than making it a pain
• Bots
  • Can I get a bot to find images that aren't at Commons?
  • Can I get a bot to move pages to a newly created subcategory?
• Article popularity for WikiProjects
• The 'list-class' is a category error.
• Rather than simply classifying WikiProjects as active/inactive, they should have an activity level scale.
• 'Articles that cite this source' (similar to 'what links here', but for articles that cite the source that is the subject of the article (e.g. a newspaper, a famous scientific paper etc.)
• What, if anything, should we do about people who contribute nothing besides a self-promoting user page? (e.g. User:Dancecritic, User:Tourist Sound)
• Do something about WP:LS
• Can Popups show the number of pages/files etc in a category, and the quality of an article?
• Is there an easier way of typing, e.g. Categories? If not, could one be created (perhaps with a template)?
• Should be able to open popup suggestions in new tab
• Subcategories should appear on the first page, especially when there are thousands of pages but only a few subcats
• Animals by colour - discuss
• Needs-photo to arthropods banner
• IFDs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:DCmasjid.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rahim_Yar_Khan_Evening.jpg
• Make a template that calls the class of an article for the articles I've created list. Is there a category for such lists?
• Option to show a link to a redirect as a red link?

[edit] Other projects I contribute to

My other work at WMF projects is almost entirely at Commons, with occasional editing at Species and other projects (though I may become more involved with others in the future).

• Commons
• Quote
• Species
• Meta
• Source
• Books

Richard001:  Subpages · User rights · Edit count · Articles created · Files uploaded · SUL

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a <references/> tag.