Theory of Deadly Initials Information & Theory of Deadly Initials Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Wakefield Hospice | Deadly Focus | Deadly Focus Reviews
Wakefield Hospice | Deadly Focus | Deadly Focus Reviews
wakefieldhospice.org
 D. O. Hebb, Neurophysiological Theory of Learning Neurophysiological...
D. O. Hebb, Neurophysiological Theory of Learning Neurophysiological...
lifecircles-inc.com
 hypnosis theory of mind, online hypnotherapy mind control theories
hypnosis theory of mind, online hypnotherapy mind control theories
lifefirst.com
 The Evolutionary Theory of Aging and Life History Theory
The Evolutionary Theory of Aging and Life History Theory
senescence.info
 

The Theory of Deadly Initials was an hypothesis published in the Journal of Psychosomatic Research in 1999[1], which proposed that there is a link between the lifespan of human males and their initials. The research, carried out by psychologists Nicholas Christenfeld, David Phillips and Laura Glynn, and published in the paper "What's in a Name: Mortality and the Power of Symbols", suggested that men with "negative" sets of initials (e.g. DIE or PIG) have, on average, a shorter lifespan than those with "positive" initials (e.g. ACE, VIP).

The average increase in life expectancy for a set of positive initials was claimed to be 4.48 years, while the average decrease in life expectancy for negative initials was claimed as 2.8 years. This is attributed to stress from teasing and lower self-worth in individuals with "deadly" initials.

In 2005, the hypothesis was investigated by Gary Smith, an economics professor at Pomona College in Claremont, California, and Stilian Morrison, a student there. They were unable to find any pattern in the samples they studied.[2]

The original research was conducted by comparing the age of people who died within a given year, while the second investigation compared the lifespans of people who were born in a given year.[3]

[edit] References

  1. ^ What's in a name: Mortality and the power of symbol. Christenfeld, Nicholas, David P. Phillips and Laura M. Glynn. J. Psychosomatic Research, vol. 47 no. 3 (September 1999), pp. 241–254.
  2. ^ Monogrammic Determinism?. Smith, Gary and Stilian Morrison. Psychosomatic Medicine, no. 67 (2005) pp. 820–824. Available online.
  3. ^ What's in a name | eG weekly | EducationGuardian.co.uk

[edit] External links

  • Guardian article in which the theory is refuted: "The Christenfeld study compared the ages of all the people who died in a particular year. But, say Smith and Morrison, if - instead - you look at the lifespans of all the people who were born in a particular year, the pattern doesn't show up. Also, they say, if you use a more complete list of "good" and "bad" words, the effect doesn't appear."



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots