 | This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |  Template | This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. | | |
[edit] Please help !!!
I created the template:WPKHITAN, but I just view that you use IF function to merge all Template:WPTIBET, Template:WPCHINA, etc.
Can you help me to merge template:WPKHITAN into this template:WPCHINA ? Yug2 (talk) 14:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I want to have a {{WPCHINA|khitan=yes|class=B|importance=Top|nested=yes}} working, as {{WPCHINA|tibet=yes|class=B|importance=Top|nested=yes}} does on Talk:Tibet Yug2 (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] C class
the quality scale for project [1] has C class but the project template does not recognise it. Please can you or someone else fix. thanks Tom (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Change history category
{{editprotected}}
could Category:Non-article history pages be changed to Category:NA-Class history articles as that is where all the history articles should be categorised to.
Thanks -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Y Done It Is Me Here t / c 16:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] image-needed
{{editprotected}} Would it be possible to change the location of where articles are place from Category:China articles needing images where there are only 6 in the list to Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in China which is more in common with most photo requests?
- Please :-) Traveler100 (talk) 09:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I see 150 articles, not 6. Anyway Category:China articles needing images seams to be a duplicate of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in China and out of standard naming (Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in XXX, right?) so... done. - Nabla (talk) 16:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Project class
Is it possible to add a "Project" class to the template? Arsonal (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Category change
{{editprotected}}
The following line:
- |Category|category|Cat|cat=[[Category:Category-Class Chinese cinema articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
should be changed to:
- |Category|category|Cat|cat=[[Category:Chinese cinema category pages|{{PAGENAME}}]]
i.e. so that articles are placed into Category:Chinese cinema category pages rather than Category:Category-Class Chinese cinema articles, per WP:FILMS standard category naming. (Note that even though Category:Category-Class Chinese cinema articles exists, it was incorrectly created (by me) and I plan to have it deleted once it been depopulated, by the above-described change). DH85868993 (talk) 10:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Done. NW (Talk) 17:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- FYI. A subsequent edit, made about a month later, has resulteed in the practical undoing of this change. I contacted the editor making the change, and would like to quote his reply here.
It would be just about possible to change this behaviour, but I would not recommend it. All other China workgroups use "articles" rather than "pages" for this and at least 99% of all WikiProjects now follow this convention. Films are also likely follow suit shortly. (I realise that it is not intuitive and occasionally proposals are made to change it, but I think a systematic approach is needed, not a piecemeal fix.) Regards, — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- In view of this reply I recommend to keep Category:Category-Class Chinese cinema articles as a redirect to Category:Chinese cinema category pages till such time as Wikipedia:WikiProject Films changes Template:Films to sort into the "articles" category as well. Debresser (talk) 11:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm fairly certain you can't redirect a populated category. PC78 (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's what we have soft redirects for, using {{Category redirect}}. But the issue has been solved otherwise, adding {{Related category}} to both category pages. Debresser (talk) 19:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, the intended purpose of {{Category redirect}} is that a bot can come along and change the category to the new one. However this does not and cannot work for categories populated by a template. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well yes, obviously. But with the new Category:Wikipedia_non-empty_soft_redirected_categories they were found soon enough and taken care of. Debresser (talk) 12:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} Can the following change from the sandbox be made. It changes the intersect categories so that Unknown has a capital U instead of a lower case one. Thanks -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I just removed the parameter as that is the default option. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
