WikiProject Constructed languages / Esperanto	(Rated Template-Class, Top-importance)	Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WP conlangsconstructed language articles
Constructed languages portal v • d • e This template is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.  Top  This template has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This template is supported by Esperanto task force. If you propose this article for deletion, or believe there is an edit war needing attention, please list it in Wikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languages/Edit wars and deletions

[edit] Problem with Esperanto task force tag

The Esperanto task force tag does not automatically place articles in the category (and subcategories) they belong in (Category:Esperanto task force articles). I believe that there is a problem with the coding, which is modified from another task force's tag (it's from WikiProject Football/USA and Canada taskforce). I am not knowledgable with the technical aspects of this template and would greatly appreciate help from someone who is familar with templates. Thank you! TFCforever (talk) 03:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you, 76.249.46.188! You really helped me out on this one.TFCforever (talk) 02:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Y Done Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 02:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another problem: importance

I tried cribbing the importance from a couple templates; the result is at {{WP conlangs sandbox}}.

It ALMOST works, but I think I broke syntax somewhere. Probably all it needs is a brace or pipe fixed. Would appreciate that being done.

Articles are already being tagged w/ importance variable; the template just needs to actually use it. Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 01:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Y Done... but now it has a trailing "{{#if:|" which isn't supposed to happen. :( Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 02:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

And now that's fixed too. AFAICT this template is good to go. Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 03:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)