Template talk:Usul al-fiqh Information & Template talk:Usul al-fiqh Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Al Mann Talks With DiabetesMine
Al Mann Talks With DiabetesMine
medgadget.com
 Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
independentliving.com
 Montr?al Yoga classes, Montr?al Yoga studio, Montr?al yoga teacher -...
Montr?al Yoga classes, Montr?al Yoga studio, Montr?al yoga teacher -...
yogadirectorycanada.com
 

Contents

[edit] Ahkam

The Ahkam section needs to be changed - those five levels are disputed amongst the sunni madhahib, I think a note should be made about this. For example, the Hanafis differentiate between Wajib and Fard.

Feel free to fix it. --Striver 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Position of Ijma

Shouldn't Ijma rate just below--or, IMHO--above Ijtihad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IFaqeer (talkcontribs) 20:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

No comment. Be bold. --Striver 00:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Very bad template

I just noticed this template -- it is extremely badly done. It is too long and detailed and since most of the terms are transliterated Arabic terms that would be unfamiliar to non-Muslims (and to many uneducated Muslims) it is close to useless. What the heck does the average English speaking reader make of Usul al-fiqh? An exotic Syrian delicacy involving figs?

I removed it from the mullah article, where it was longer than the article and completely unbalanced the formatting. If you want to use this template, it needs to be drastically revised. Zora 09:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Scholarly titles section

The ordering of the scholarly titles at the bototm of this box seems arbitrary. Not sure which is the best ordering. Probably I would recommend English alphabetical. ZaydHammoudeh 02:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the English Wiki so yes, order by the English alphabet RooZ 01:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots