WikiProject U.S. Congress	(Rated Template-Class)	U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:Project CongressU.S. Congress articles
v • d • e This template is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Contents 1 Proposed additional fields 2 Nested Parameter Added 3 Documentation 4 New version of template

[edit] Proposed additional fields

Look at {{WikiProject New York}}. What do you think about adding these fields here? I'm thinking both Pro: More is good; and Con: enough already with classifications and the like. —Markles 19:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for bringing this up for discussion. My thought is that there are too many missing and incomplete articles to divert attention to the classification and rating process right now.--G1076 07:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes. I agree.—Markles 13:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nested Parameter Added

For your convenience, I have added a nested= parameter to your WikiProject's template. The nested= parameter allows use of your WikiProject's template within the WikiProjectBannerShell template. This is part of an ongoing effort to make WikiProject templates more standardized and less intrusive. Please feel free to revert my changes if you feel that they are not beneficial to your WikiProject's template or you are concerned about them in any way. If you do so, however, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you, — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 17:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Documentation

This template lacks documentation about usage (how to use it and include the parameters). --Mac (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New version of template

There is an updated template at Template:Project Congress/sandbox which uses WPBannerMeta. Any objections to using it? -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

• No objections as long as it integrates all three factors: class, importance & subject.—Markles 14:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Could the sandbox version be copied over to live. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

• Y Done, and the old one is now at Template:Project Congress/archive.—Markles 17:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)