 | This template is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numismatism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | | Template | This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. | | |
[edit] 100 Perpers
This is definately a beautiful coin. However, we are trying to use a different photo than the one for {{Coin-stub}}. It would be preferrable to use a note instead of a coin for this stub. --JAYMEDINC 14:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. The euro image was placed because there is a "freer" substitution. What we need is a very old, uncirculated, yet beautiful banknote image that is in public domain. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 20:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not trying to detract from the beauty of the coin, but I find it a little large. Resizing to 35px is much nicer in my opinion, even if the coin isn't quite so clear, but I'll wait for agreement ;). On the note of banknotes, something like File:1933-3-30-50.jpg perhaps? Jeodesic 23:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Year, the 5 kopek stub image may be too big. Even though I can tell right away what you suggest is a Reichsmark note at thumbnail size, I'm not sure if a casual reader can. But I don't feel strongly either way. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)