 | This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot II. Sections with no replies in 60 days are automatically moved. |
[edit] Christian films task force
{{editprotected}} Please implement this diff, currently contained within the sandbox. Adds support for this new task force; no major structural changes to the template otherwise. Many thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- That diff also removed a lot of code from the template. I don't suppose that was intentional? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- It may have removed code from the sandbox version, but not the template version. I simply copied the template code into the sandbox and modified that. I see that PC78 made some recent sandbox edits prior, which may have been removed from the sandbox in effect by this. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 13:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh I see. "Implement this version" would have been clearer than "implement this diff" ... anyway
Y Done. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} Please also update {{Film/Checks}} with {{Film/Checks/sandbox}}. Cheers! PC78 (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Will have to start declining all requests until you deal with the matter on your userpage ;) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} Can someone please change the icon for the Christian films task force to File:Golden Cross Clapperboard.svg, per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Christian films task force? Cheers! PC78 (talk) 10:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Y Done Happy‑melon 10:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Edit request (2)
{{editprotected}} Please update {{Film}} with the code in {{Film/sandbox}}, and also {{Film/Checks}} with {{Film/Checks/sandbox}}. Per discussion at WT:FILMC, this will modify the |A-Class= parameter to place a greater emphasis on current reviews, and will also enable an |auto= parameter to facilitate the tracking of future tagging and assessment by bots. Please also delete Cat:Film banners using the nested parameter which is now empty and will no longer be required. PC78 (talk) 02:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- This is quite a complicated banner. have you considered using {{WPBannerMeta}}? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 05:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- PC78 will have to speak for himself, but as the other main contributor to the code, I think that we both feel that because of this we'd rather have the freedom and flexibility to create and retool the banner to our needs rather than constantly be submitting specialized functions to someone else for approval. This banner is rather sophisticated and complex, but it also is able to accomplish a great deal that other banners don't, and generally has been without problems. At the moment, in my opinion, the benefits of Meta are outweighed by the costs of joining it, as well as our project's needs, which are more than adequately met in the current situation. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see this template doing anything that the Meta can't, but ok. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 15:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
-
Y Done. Let me know if something inadvertently breaks, and I'll rv (and in the meantime, I'd work on possibly making the code more readable ;) ). 「ダイノガイ千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 06:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
{{editrequest}} OK, I managed to break something. :) Please update with the code in {{Film/sandbox}} again, which will resolve the issue. PC78 (talk) 11:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Think you've still got something wrong. How can the {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Infobox Actor bit work if it's inside noinclude? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ahem! I think you have the wrong template. PC78 (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, it's me who's got the wrong template -- that's what I get for copying code from other templates during the small hours! Obviously it should be Template:Film and not Template:Infobox Actor. Can you check the "Checks" subtemplate as well? PC78 (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- After fixing it in what seemed to be the simplest way, the purpose of this strange construction dawned on me: so you can have exactly the same code on the sandbox as the live version. I suppose it's a reasonable idea, although the {{pp-template}} is specifically set up to allow it to go on sandbox versions without causing an error (i.e. by populating Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates). So the only real effect then is the sandbox notice ... Anyway if you want it putting back, let me know. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not worth editing the template again just for that. It just seemed like a neat idea, because I often see the protected template being removed from sandboxed templates. PC78 (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] List of Film Articles that need an image
can someone tell me where i can find a list of film articles that need an image?--Tim1357 (talk) 02:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Category:Film articles needing an image -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Update
{{editprotected}} Please update with the code at {{Film/sandbox}}. The icon for the Awards task force was deleted on Commons a few days ago and needs to be replaced. I've also made two other very minor tweaks. Thanks in advance! PC78 (talk) 00:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. Skomorokh 01:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Banner update
{{editprotected}} Please update the following templates with the code from their respective sandboxes:
This is per recent discussions at WT:FILMC. Summary of changes:
- Add support for C-Class assessments
- Remove support for Future-Class assessments
- Remove support for A-Class review nominations, and restrict A-Class assessments to articles which have already passed a review
- Remove "needs-plot", "needs-cast" and "needs-prod" parameters
Thanks in advance. PC78 (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Y Done. I figured this was an accidental typo, let me know if it's not. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC) - Good catch. Thanks! PC78 (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)