Template talk:Family law Information & Template talk:Family law Links at HealthHaven.com

(Rated Template-Class)

Law portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

[edit] NPOV? Incest

I'm not sure the framing of Incest on this template is entirely NPOV. While I appreciate the effort to organise matters, incest isn't considered a crime (or even wrong) in all cultures, so having a big "family law - crimes" template at the top of the page isn't entirely neutral. Perhaps we could split out the incest-with-childeren-in-modern-cultures section and only put the template on that? --fvw * 04:24, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Virtually all cultures condemn some kinds of incest (e.g. mother/son) even between consenting adults - just as virtually all cultures permit unfettered relationships with blood relatives outside a certain degree of separation (condemndation of "incest" between, say, 5th cousins twice removed, would be inconceivable). So long as this is developed in the incest article, which I believe it is, then I think the template link is fine. BD2412 ^talk 05:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
in many cultures incest it's legal. And in even more cultures adultery it's not a crime. This kinf of language is far from neutral, and extremly offensive.
- As a compromise position, I've titled the section "Areas of possible legal concern" - which they most definitely are. Even if adultery is not a crime, it is grounds for a divorce (and hence a legal concern) throughout the U.S., Canada, the UK, China, India, Australia, and probably most other countries. Similarly, there are many jurisdictions where a bigamous or incestuous marriage may be annulled, even though no criminal prosecution would follow. BD2412 T 17:55, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cohabitation

Cohabitation probably should be referenced - not sure where. -- Paul foord 10:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Done. Cheers! BD2412 T 14:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)