 | This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | |  Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. | | | | This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status: | |  Referencing and citation: not checked- Coverage and accuracy: not checked
- Structure: not checked
- Grammar and style: not checked
- Supporting materials: not checked
| To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> | b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> | b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> | b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> | b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. | | | | | This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines project. | | |
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | | | |
Dear Writer,
I was intrested reading your page on VIASA I need to correct you that VIASA did have a crash near LISBOA Portugal on 30/5/61 DC-8-52 PH-DCL (Aircraft name) "Fridjof Nansen" KLM owned in service for VIASA throgh a wet lease.
Kind regards Willem
- In the article there was no mention of anyone being blamed for the crash. Saying that Viasa was not to blame without any source quoted and whitout any previous POV comment having hinted it was, amounts to a POV comment.
- Stating that rest is mandated by international regulations does address what was being said; "when compared to others" - as all airlines would be subject to the same regulation. Regulations stablished a minimum floor. It is up to each airline and their unions to change it to more if they so negotiate. The new comment did not address the initial comment. --Anagnorisis 17:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
