| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking... independentliving.com | Osenses: Antibodies, Olfactory Receptors, GPCRs, Sensory Neurons,... osenses.com |
Hmmm... How come this page about Receptors is under 'Proteomics' ? How about 'Cell Biology' or 'Pharmacology' ? - PFHLai 14:11, 2004 May 18 (UTC) I concur. Although receptors are mainly proteins, not all are. This article should be moved and edited to correct this. - Centrx 21:59, 19 May 2004 (UTC) Revision: I don't know much about biology, so I don't know if all neuronal/tissue receptors are proteins. However, this article conflates both these kind of receptors, which recognize neurotransmitters, hormones, etc., and immune receptors, which are on a region of antibody molecules and recognize antigens. The latter kind are not proteins. Conclusion: 1) Properly, the latter kind should not be discussed in this article. 2) If it is not true that all receptors of the former kind are proteins, this article should be renamed and edited to correct this. - Centrx 22:30, 19 May 2004 (UTC) "Many genetic disorders involve hereditary defects in receptor genes..." why the heck is this the first paragraph in the overview? i'm making into its own section. Amutepiggy 22:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] electroreceptorsI was surprised to be redirected from a page on the electroreceptors in the platypus bill to this page. Aren't we talking about two different things here, or am I mistaken?Adambrowne666 fixed - hope no one minds Adambrowne666 [edit] sympathetic receptorsWhat is a sympathetic receptors? --Abdull 16:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nuclear Receptors and Transcription FactorsThe authors need to include NUCLEAR RECEPTORS... include a description and link to the Wikipedia article on Nuclear Receptors. Also, the section on Transcription Factor needs to be changed... while it is true that the various steroidal nuclear receptors are technically transcription factors, this is conceptually upside down. The BASIC CONCEPT is that steroidal hormones fit the classic Ligand-Receptor interaction model. They should be described as nuclear receptors first, and transcription factors second. [edit] changing disambiguation structure?If you look at receptor, it has many incoming links, almost all meant for this article. I propose this article is moved to receptor, and the disambiguation page moved to receptor (disambiguation), with a link to that placed at the top of (the new) receptor. ssepp(talk) 21:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Toll-like receptors ?Could these be added to the appropriate section (whatever that is) Rod57 10:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
How can receptors enter the nucleous?---- [edit] two senses of receptorI think the term receptor refers to two separate concepts in biochemistry and these should be covered in separate articles to avoid confusion.
This distinction should be made in the disambiguation page for receptor and two separate articles should cover these topics broadly. --InfoCan (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC) [edit] Kd and its reaction as shown is wrongThe equation L.R <--> LR is wrong. It should be L + R <--> LR
And the constant corresponds to Ka, not to Kd (the reaction as it is shown correspond to an association, not to a dissociation). The reverse equation corresponds to Kd and Ka = 1/Kd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.16.86.36 (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |