Talk:Military aircraft Information & Talk:Military aircraft Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
independentliving.com
 Military Cooling Kits, military cooling vests, military cooling and...
Military Cooling Kits, military cooling vests, military cooling and...
polarsoftice.com
 Raleigh, NC, Day Spa Provides Special Pricing for Military and Military...
Raleigh, NC, Day Spa Provides Special Pricing for Military and Military...
pacificmedicalspa.com
 
WikiProject Aviation / Aircraft (Rated Stub-Class)
Wrightflyer thumb.jpg This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Silhouette An-124.svg
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

As briefly discussed in Talk:Military_aircraft_list the large list in that article has been broken down across several categories, [Military aircraft list] currently redirects to Military aircraft.


Hello, I'm a french wikipedian and I don't understand why exists on the wikipedia (free community) a link having a relationship with a play Micro$oft (Flight Simulator) whereas Micro$oft is against the Free community. Could somebody explain me? Thanks

it is arguable today that Microsoft is entirely "against" the free community; it has open sourced some of its software, sometimes using sourceforge. in any case, microsoft's business principles do not concern us here. this is an encyclopedia intended to provide helpful, accurate information, and that goal overrides any personal objections we have regarding the external sites to which we link. ✈ James C. 07:01, 2004 Jul 27 (UTC)
Escuse me for the delay, you are right, that doesn't concern us, but I wonder if this link is encyclopedic. I think, it isn't indispensable. Escuse me for my english, I'm bad.
I agree, I don't see how a link to a game site can be appropriate where I added a link yesterday to airfighters.com where people can view photos of the real thing and it got removed. This is the Military Aircraft page and not the Military Aircraft Games page, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhantomPhanII (talkcontribs) 14:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] British Military Aircraft

Below is a link to a page containing the leading particulars of all British Military aircraft. I don't know where this could be best utilised, here seemed a good start. http://www.jap100a-01.mod.uk/Jap(d)/JAP%20100A%2002%20Chap%201.3.htm Dredwerkz (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)




Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots