Any current or future editor who makes substantial edits to any Scientology-related articles or discussions on any page is directed: - To edit on these from only a single user account, which shall be the user's sole or main account, unless the user has previously sought and obtained permission from the Arbitration Committee to operate a legitimate second account;
- To edit only through a conventional internet service provider and not through any form of proxy configuration;
- To edit in accordance with all Wikipedia policies and to refrain from any form of advocacy concerning any external controversy, dispute, allegation, or proceeding; and
- To disclose on the relevant talk pages any circumstances (but not including personal identifying information) that constitute or may reasonably be perceived as constituting a conflict of interest with respect to that page.
If any editor fails to comply with the spirit or letter of these instructions, any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, ban any editor from editing within the Scientology topic. Prior to topic banning the editor, the administrator will leave a message on the editor's talk page, linking to this paragraph, warning the editor that a topic ban is contemplated and outlining the behaviours for which it is contemplated. If the editor fails to heed the warning, the editor may be topic banned, initially, for three months, then with additional topic bans increasing in duration to a maximum of one year. | | | This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. |
Any current or future editor who makes substantial edits to any Scientology-related articles or discussions on any page is directed: - To edit on these from only a single user account, which shall be the user's sole or main account, unless the user has previously sought and obtained permission from the Arbitration Committee to operate a legitimate second account;
- To edit only through a conventional internet service provider and not through any form of proxy configuration;
- To edit in accordance with all Wikipedia policies and to refrain from any form of advocacy concerning any external controversy, dispute, allegation, or proceeding; and
- To disclose on the relevant talk pages any circumstances (but not including personal identifying information) that constitute or may reasonably be perceived as constituting a conflict of interest with respect to that page.
If any editor fails to comply with the spirit or letter of these instructions, any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, ban any editor from editing within the Scientology topic. Prior to topic banning the editor, the administrator will leave a message on the editor's talk page, linking to this paragraph, warning the editor that a topic ban is contemplated and outlining the behaviours for which it is contemplated. If the editor fails to heed the warning, the editor may be topic banned, initially, for three months, then with additional topic bans increasing in duration to a maximum of one year. | |  | This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article L. Ron Hubbard, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. | |  B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | | |  | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | | | B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | |  | L. Ron Hubbard is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | | | B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | | |  | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative Views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. | | | B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | | | |  | This page has been cited as a source by a media organization. The citation is in: |  | This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please discuss substantial changes here before making them, making sure to supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing uncited/unciteable information. | [edit] Hubbard holding the world record as "most translated author"-a lie? Aside from the fact that the only links provided backing this fact up are from scientology sites-all the details are exactly the same as author Sidney Sheldon, who is in reality the one holding the Guinness World Record for most Translated author. Sheldon's page on the Biography channel website There are so many other sources besides Sheldon's own site claiming he has the title. I really think this should be looked into, any other man/organization would have been slammed for stealing another's achievements and trying to pose them as their own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkxy (talk • contribs) 18:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC) [edit] ..Why use this picture? Someone find a more relevant picture, maybe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.137.248.46 (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Judging by the tenacity with which scientologists protect their material, including anything related to hubbard it will likely be difficult to find a photo of the man in the public domain. Vinithehat (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC) It's beautiful. 128.125.19.239 (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC) [edit] Sourced info removed by Richard-of-Earth The account Richard-of-Earth (talk · contribs) removed sourced info from this article, claiming in an edit summary that the ref did not support the info [1]. Here is the cite and quote from the source: To close, I would like to cite one last passage from one of Hubbard's bulletins, in which he describes his own future re-incarnation on this earth. The secrets of his teaching have been entrusted to his loyal students, who are commissioned with preserving them until Hubbard's eventual return to this world, at a time when he will assume a more explicitly political role than he has in this life:
I will return not as a religious leader but a political one. That happens to be the requisite beingness for the task at hand...So there you have it. The secret that I have kept close to my chest all these years. Now you too are part of this secret and I no longer have to shoulder the burden alone...With this briefing I entrust to each of you the responsibility for this material until such time as I am able to return...The handful of secret societies throughout history that have caught on to this game have long since fallen by the wayside or been taken over and become instruments of the very menace they were set up to combat. - Urban, Hugh B. (June 2006). "Fair Game: Secrecy, Security, and the Church of Scientology in Cold War America". Journal of the American Academy of Religion (Oxford University Press) 74 (2): 356–389. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfj084. ISSN 1477-4585.
The ref clearly supports the info. Please do not remove it again - especially under a false edit summary. Cirt (talk) 10:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC) -
- Well, I just looked at it again and I found it at the end. My mistake and my apologies. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. Cirt (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Midi-chlorian count? what was his midi-chlorian count? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.136.78 (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) - Off the scale, clearly. -- ChrisO (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
|
