| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking... independentliving.com | Middletown Dentist, Middletown Cosmetic Dentist, Middletown General... jollysmiles.com |
[edit] Theories..just another theory states that the flag was derived from the old austrian flad (white eagle on black ground, which may be mistaken from the far for the Jolly Roger)because Austria at that time issued quite a number of letters of marque. It is at least as sounding as the other proposed theories.
What is with this article? It goes on forever naming possible etymologies, and never gives the final word. It says such and such is true "according to the history channel." Such and such is true "according to National Geographic." Either do your homework, or please don't tell that you learned things from the history channel. That'd be like sleeping with a girl and saying with a straight face "yeah that position, I learned that from watching hours pornography." Take a word of advice and shhh. Finally what does that mean to fire a missile "in anger?" 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)~ [edit] The Jolly RogerOk, this has to be one of the vaguest and worst articles I've read in the wiki project. Namely because it dilly dallies about without hitting on accurate points insofar as the history aspect. The Jolly Roger as the joli rouge is accepted as a fact pretty much these days, the question lies in the fact that two flags were used, one as a heal-to, one as a battle flag. If the Skull and Crossbones didn't stop the opponent, the Jolly Roger was raised. Just because popular disney mentality has brought us into thinking the two flags are one in the same doesn't make it fact. The Skull and Crossbones flag related article has nothing to do with the flag and is to do with the poison logo, which is another disheartening article altogether. Has anyone suggested a peer review on these two articles? The S&C was the naval battle flag of the Knights Templars, it re-emerged when quite a few popular admirals cum pirates / privateers utilised one of the symbols of freemasonry, which many were alledged to be a part of, as their battle flag. There's too much ambiguity in this article about that. Jachin 1 July 2005 08:59 (UTC) There seems to be some contradiction in this article. We are told that privateers or pirates may have flown a red jack to indicate that none would spared but also: "Typically, if a ship then decided to resist, the Jolly Roger was taken down and a red flag was then flown, indicating that the pirates intend to take the ship by force and without mercy...[i]t was hoped by many crews that this course of action would help spread the word that resistance was a poor idea for ships." Who would escape to spread the word if the crew received no mercy? 12 February 2007
I have looked recently for info on this but cannot find any. Is this another case of a school text not doing due dilligence and not propperly vetting their sources?--WolvenSpectre (talk) 16:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Has anyone considered adding the other name for a Jolly Roger Happy Morgan (Bloodraven01 (talk) 23:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)) [edit] Other Jolly Rogers?I think the article could use pictures of the 'alternative' Jolly Rogers Borisblue 06:54, 21 November 2005 (UTC) Testing Watchlist PPGMD 1 July 2005 17:47 (UTC) "...became the first Royal Navy submarine to fire a cruise missile in anger" - what does "in anger" refers to? Nikola 22:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] SVGAnyone have the flag picture in SVG format? Frap 19:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC) [edit] CaptionDoes anyone have a reference for whether the Jolly Roger signifies a kill or a successful combat mission? Stephen B Streater 22:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC) [edit] GA FailedThe Good article [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] for this page has failed. The article only cites sources for the "Use by submarines" and "Use by United States Navy aviators" sections; every section needs to be sourced. Additional items for improvement include:
I hope this comments are helpful. Best of luck in your editing! -Alex S 23:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC) I tried to make a beginning. Weird Bird 08:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC) "Pirates and the Lost Templar Fleet" by David Hatcher Childress states that the Jolly Roger, was a masonic symbol used by Knights Templar and symbolically refers to "Baphomet" the head and bones of someone famous to them (ie: Mary Magdelene's bones, John the Baptist's bones, or Jesus' bones. See "The Da Vinci Code.")
[edit] Current legal statusThe clerks at the local marine store said that it is illegal to fly the jolly roger in American waters. Anybody know if that is true? The clerk was wrong. You can fly it as long as the American one is above it. I've been to Key West, and I'm drawing this from observation.--Count Mall 14:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] black beardThe article on black beard says that this flag is erroneous. They conflict. [edit] Dubious 'Other Use' RemovedI've removed the following from the 'other uses' section, as I can't find any other reference to it:
Rojomoke 13:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Removing references to "Old Roger"It has come to my attention from the author of "Quelch's Gold" that the pirate flag klnown as "Old Roger" supposedly flown by John Quelch in 1704 is a myth. I have therefore removed it from the section on the name's origins. Pirate Dan 15:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Somewhat insulting to the readerThe first section says: Since the decline of piracy, various military units have used the Jolly Roger, usually in skull-and-crossbones design, as a unit identification insignia or a victory flag. Such use of the Jolly Roger is not intended to identify the users as piratical, but to ascribe to themselves the proverbial ferocity and toughness of pirates. I think spelling out to the reader that military units are not using the flag for 'piratical' reasons is not necessary. Instead how about crossing out this...?: Since the decline of piracy, various military units have used the Jolly Roger, usually in skull-and-crossbones design, as a unit identification insignia or a victory flag, Leaving us with: Since the decline of piracy, various military units have used the Jolly Roger, usually in skull-and-crossbones design, as a unit identification insignia or a victory flag, to ascribe to themselves the proverbial ferocity and toughness of pirates. Just a thought, Ajani57 04:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC) I wrote it that way, and I'm OK with changing it as you suggest. Editing. Pirate Dan 18:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Never mind, it's already been done. Pirate Dan 18:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] VerificationAnything that is not supported by citations of verifiable reliable sources should be removed see WP:PROVEIT. There is so little cited in some sections that I have added the template {{unreferencedsection}} dated to November 2007. Any information in any of the sections so marked, should be deleted unless citations from verifiable reliable sources are added. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Removed sections with template that indicates no citations which have been in place for a month or more.[1] See Wikipedia policy WP:PROVEIT for why I deleted those sections. It is my intention in the next few days/weeks to delete most of the rest of the text that does not carry citations. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Richard Hawkins QuoteThe Richard Hawkins quote about black and red flags appears in several books I can find but none that looks like a respectable academic work of history. It's possible that this quote has been repeated verbatim but was originally made up or misremembered. Without a primary source, it may be best to delete this quote or list it as of uncertain origin. This is a shame because it's a nice quote. It would be best if somebody could verify it with a trustworthy source.SmartPatrol (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removed "Media" sectionBadly spelled, and I'm not sure about notability either. If someone wants to add that information back in (with citations) I suggest they include a list of other film, television, game, etc. references - an entire section for one character from one online game seems inappropriate. (Also, wasn't Jolly Roger a character from one of the movies as well? --Dbutler1986 (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Anarchist cookbookI dont know how much relevance you guy might think this has to the article but "Jolly Rogers" is also the official/unofficial author of the Anarchist Cookbook (hehe which makes perfect sense now since the book is pretty much about scamming, stealing, and just being an all around pirate). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.213.82.112 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 1 June 2008 [edit] Origins of the designI have moved this recent edition to the article to here:
because it does not carry any citations (see WP:PROVEIT)--Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpgThe image Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC) [edit] Jolly Rogers Gallery
I have moved the gallery from the article page to here because not one of the flag descriptions carries a citation from a reliable source. The flags need to have that because otherwise anyone can make up any flag and claim it is so & so's flag. --PBS (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Remove Templar section?We have had the David Hatcher Childress theory that the Jolly Roger is a Templar symbol in the article for some time. However, Childress' Pirates and the Lost Templar Fleet is published by Adventures Unlimited Press - which Childress owns himself, according to this article: [2]. Therefore, I believe it is "self-published" by Wikipedia standards, and should be booted out. The theory is dubious on so many levels anyway: there is no evidence of Templar survival after Philip IV destroyed it, no evidence of the use of the phrase "Jolly Roger" until 1721, and then it was used by predominantly Protestant Anglophone pirates who had no reason to adopt the symbols of a Catholic holy order. Bartholomew Roberts' crew, for example, was so violently anti-Catholic that they refused to consider a "Papist" for their leader. Pirate Dan (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Use in World War I aviationWorld War I usage is different from "Four squadrons of the 90th Bombardment Group of the Fifth Air Force under General George C. Kenney, commanded by Colonel Art Rogers were known as the Jolly Rogers. " as the section has no citation given of any sort, there there is no cited evidence that the use of a scull and crossbones motif was a Jolly Rodger and not some other use of similar military emblems. So I have removed the section. --PBS (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC) [edit] "All are in agreement"If this line can't be removed, can it be explained? It's not at all clear what it even means. The plain reading of the line seems to indicate that all extant sources are in total agreement that every detail, save one, of the flags pictured below is historically accurate. That seems insane and very difficult to reference. Does it mean only that the references cited agree with the images included in the article? That should go with out saying. Either way what are "All" sources in agreement with? Each other? Or the images as shown? Or does it mean something else, that I've completely missed? APL (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |