 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |  B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. | | |
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | | | B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. | | High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | | |
 | Human rights in Morocco received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
- I think this topic deserves its own article. It certainly makes it easier to reference human rights by country as a topic unto itself. This is also consistant with other human rights related articles. Rklawton 05:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree with a merge too. This article can be expanded. And the Morocco article doesn't need this as a section. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countries has set up guidelines for the structure of country articles and these guidelines do not include a human rights section. [This unsigned comment was written by User:Bkwillwm]
- I agree with both of you, its an interesting subject which should have its own article (especially since there is a similar one on Western Sahara). Ideally, I think every country and territory should have a human rights entry. (I took the liberty to edit the post above.) Arre 06:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
*There is no reason for a merger. Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 22:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
These are some of the remarks I had on the article:
- Judging that Morocco is undemocratic is not clear and is anyway not a matter of human rights. Human rights can be abused in the most democratic countries.
- Mixing social problems with human rights issues: child labor, violence against women and human trafficking don't fall in the category of abuses
commited by the state against its citizens, and are not occuring in Morocco more than any other African country.
- The attacks in Casablanca are terrorism and not to be linked to any religion. The majority of the victims were Muslims.
- The Equity and Reconciliation Commission did not protect nor allowed anyone to continue in office. Its mission was not to mention the names of individuals, because the outrages were commited by the state, and letting the guilt on individuals will excempt the state of it.
- Most of the "Years of Lead" fall in the sixties and the seventies and to a lesser degree the eighties.
- Are considered victims even the putshists that spent more time in jail than their sentences. They were the majority of Tazmamart detention centre.
- Most of the abuses attributed to the reign of King Mohammed V, are related to the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on Casablanca.
- Independent press (Le Journal Hebdomadaire, Assahifa, TelQuel, AlJarida Alokhra, ...) do debate many of the things mentionned in the article as prohibited, such as restricting the powers of the King, the reform of the monarchy, the official approach of The Sahara problem, and the role of political Islam in politics. --SteveLo 20:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Youtube
Youtube was blocked for a couple of days by one of the three operators of the country. The state does not own Meditel, but is actionary in it as Vivendi is. During the three days of block, Moroccans have all the time been able to access Youtube through the other operators. So, firstly, there is no proof that the governement of Morocco was behind the block. Secondly, how can the state of Morocco block a site through one operator knowing that people will still access it through the other operators as if there were no block. People can in these situations jump to different conspiracy theories, but this is an encyclopedia based on facts, not on "jumps".--A Jalil 08:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Jalil for this.
- This is also just a non-event frankly.
-
- wikima 19:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Western Sahara
Morocco's conduct in the western sahara is widely regarded as a major moroccan human rights issue. This surely deserves more than a simple 'see also' in the end of the article. i've added this to the lead. 132.66.52.149 (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removed line from the berber identity section
The line was "Two annonomous candidates strongly agree." and it made no sense, aside from being gramaticaly incorect .
User NB , not bothering to sing on, as --93.185.50.19 (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Persecution of Shi'a Muslims
Morocco has recently cut diplomatic relations with Iran, and there have been many rumours that Shi'a Muslims in Morocco cannot practice their religion openly anymore. Can anyone throw some light upon this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.149.21.152 (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
