Talk:History of Microsoft Office Information & Talk:History of Microsoft Office Links at HealthHaven.com
advertise
add site
services
publishers
database
health videos
Bookmark and Share

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 
about
toolbar
stats
live show
health store
more stuff
JOIN/LOGIN
Featured Results:
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
Talking Watch, Talking Watches, Talking Clock, Talking Bible, Talking...
independentliving.com
  Microsoft Office PowerPoint Viewer Readme File
Microsoft Office PowerPoint Viewer Readme File
rcsw.org
 Blytheville Dental Office , Gosnell Dental Office , Jonesboro Dental...
Blytheville Dental Office, Gosnell Dental Office, Jonesboro Dental...
higginbothamfamilydental....
 
WikiProject Computing / Software (Rated List-Class, Low-importance)
Crystal 128 kcontrol.png This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
List-Class article List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Exquisite-network.png
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

[edit] Creator notes

I make no assertion about the notability of the topic, although I expect it can be defended easily enough - popular press iterations with a similar structure surely abound - but rather created this to get some of the crufty list-style content out of the main article. MrZaiustalk 21:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for splitting up the long Microsoft Office article. However, I am not sure this is the best move, while I was proposing split into History of Microsoft Office which might be better in my opinion. What about renaming this page to History of Microsoft Office and removing the section "Current version for Windows" as it doubles information with Microsoft Office 2007#Editions?--Kozuch (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, there was almost no historical content in this article. Calling it a list of components was much more accurate, as that was all that was moved. There is so little prose content in the Office article that if an editor did wish to expand on its history that they should do it there, first IMHO. MrZaiustalk 12:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)



Product Results (view all...)

search wiki for    ?
web dir firms image gallery news pdf wiki shop video 



↑ top of page ↑about thumbshots