| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Exercise Cycle,Exercise Cycles,Mini Exercise Cycle,Exercise Bike Cycle - pycfitness.com | Cycling Inserts | Cycling Insoles | Performance Inserts Cycling Shoes |... biocorrect.com |
[edit] Article's qualityDoes it describe Eukaryotic cells or all cells ? Do all cells folow this cycle or are there some exceptions ? -- Taw
Is there a reason to have this article separate from Cell division and Mitosis - Marshman 05:46, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I think this topic would deserve some additional, more detailed information. (exeact transitions, checkpoints, cyclins, CDK's and CKI's in detail etc.) I would be glad to add some more information, regarding the importance of the subject (in cancer research, for example), but as I am only a I could use no other source of knowledge but my textbooks, so I would be happy to have an expert look through my work every once in a while. Additionally, I fear that stacking up the article with scientific info would make the whole article frightening and overwhelming for non-professionals. What would you recommend in order to avoid that? Would having separate sections in the article after the current one as an introduction be sufficient, or would it be better to add a new article "Cell cycle in detail", or just have a number of new pages linked into the main page (eg. "Replication initiation mechanisms")? What would be the general Wikipedia practice in such cases? AttishOculus 22:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) This article lacks so much info...i mean a lot. I came here looking for help on the topic--because i just couldn't understand some of it, and it wasn't here. All of the stages require info of the cell cycle. The Mitosis part deserves its own part. The cycle's checking system needs its own part. This is one bad article. I'll try to fix it in a day or two after my test. :) Nominaladversary 01:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No description of basic process of cell divisionThere has to be a section dvoted to description of all phases during mitosis (and variations during a meiosis). The article seems to dwell heavily upon recent advances in molecular biology. These advances have to be placed in perspective with the general biology of the cell cycle Nattu 20:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image issuesThe current illustration of the cell cycle should be removed or replaced in my opinion. It would almost have been ok if all the phases seemed to have equal duration. But in this illustration S phase is actually smaller than the G2 phase! - HungryHippo 19. july 2006
Berthet, C., E. Aleem, V. Coppola, L. Tessarollo, and P. Kaldis. 2003. Cdk2 knockout mice are viable. Curr. Biol. 13:1775–1785. The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 178, No. 2, July 16, 2007 257–268 Please consider revision of this image! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.120.113 (talk) 11:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC) [edit] About diploid, haploid and monoploid"In this quantity of DNA within the cell has increased to 4c, but the cell is still considered diploid." Finally i got the information. [edit] embryologyDoes anyone happen to know any embryologists? I think Embryology really needs a lot of expert attention. would sympathtic editors consider a positive vote here? [1]Slrubenstein | Talk 19:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC) [edit] Mitosis vs. M phaseAs far as I know M phase=Mitosis+Cytokinesis, but there is no article on M phase, only on Mitosis, and in the picture: , I think, M phase is denoted by letter "M" and not Mitosis, as there are four phases: G1, S, G2 and M (+G0). Should the text below the picture be changed? Andrius 14:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] About the diagramI can make a fairly good diagram, but I am not an exepert on cellulear procesess, so e-mail me with even a napkin drawing of the correct process and I'll "pimp it out". thanks Yupi666 20:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Copyedit and minor expansionI have done some minor expansion and copy-editing and fixed some formatting issues. I will be adding some references in the coming one or two days. Please comment here if there are any errors or omissions. Also, I think it would be better if we do away with the Observation and Research Groups sections. Also, Regulation of cell cycle can be greatly expanded. Or can be made into a totally separate article. Any comments? - TwoOars 10:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] ReferencesAdded a few references. Am removing the "refs needed" tag. I do not know how to add inline refs though, for the rest of the stuff - I mean the basic stuff about the phases, which is found in any basic textbook. Am assuming inline refs are not needed in such cases. - TwoOars 19:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] The templateAs an aside, how about adding links to the checkpoints from {{Cell cycle}}? Please comment at Template talk:Cell cycle. Thanks. - TwoOars 18:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another problem with the diagramThe Yellow "M" should not refer to Metaphase but to mitosis again. The counterpart of interphase is not the metaphase but the mitosis which include prophase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vardos (talk • contribs)
[edit] Why only eukaryotes?The term Cell Cycle can apply to both prokaryotes and eukarotes, but the article focuses entirely on eukaryotes. In my opinion the article can be strengthened with an additional prokaryote section....or at the minimum, include some sort of reference to prokaryotes. --Naturespace (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC) [edit] Qualityi would just like to note that my grade 9 science textbook has better descriptions on what actually happens in cell division and if i remember correctly there are alot more phases than the 4 mentioned.... Walkerm930 (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] cell cycleis a function of life and how that it wordks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.211.230.126 (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |