This article has been renamed from Cafeteria (structure) to Cafeteria as the result of a move request.

WikiProject Food and drink / Foodservice task force	(Rated C-Class, High-importance)	Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Food portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (marked as High-importance). This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Food and Drink task list: edit · history · watch · purge Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Water, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yoghurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom) Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to members attention. It could encourage new members to the project too. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, click here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food Review articles currently up for GA status: Burger King legal issues, Chocolate

Contents 1 WPFood assessment 2 Conflicting Information 3 America-centered 4 Spanish Cafeteria 5 Pictures in this article 6 Disambiguation 7 Requested move

[edit] WPFood assessment

The is article is a C-class high importance article.

It needs attention in the following areas:

• Copy edit for structure, prose and duplications
• References from reliable sources
• Copy edit for punctuation and grammar.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 05:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conflicting Information

I have learned from a broadcast of Hidden Chicago on PBS that the term Cafeteria was coined in Chicago. Yet, this article states that is of Spanish origin and coined in Los Angeles and another claims that it was coined in New York (Hutchinson Encyclopedia) Ishmael Rufus (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] America-centered

This article is really US-centered, it says nothing about dutch-style cafetaria's... Someone should write something about that. --62.251.90.73 28 June 2005 18:15 (UTC)

---

Is Michigan State University's cafeteria system really special enough to warrant its own section here? I think not. Teflon 12:21, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Is there a reason all the external links are to MSU websites? Gentgeen 22:15, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm guessing the person writing it was an MSU student, and those are the sources he had.

[edit] Spanish Cafeteria

I dont think that link is really anything to do with this article. Here in Spain a "cafetería" is a café or coffee shop elsewhere. Not the same thing at all as what this article is about. Rosa.blaus 09:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures in this article

I took the liberty to remove one picture. In my opinion it was not a very good one because most of it was the back of a chair and the floor. Please put back if you like but an alternative would be better. Miguel Andrade 16:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation

Shouldn't this article be Cafeteria without the (structure) part? I understand that there is an organism named Cafeteria, but really, wouldn't most people be looking for the structure anyway? If the genus does ever get its own article, we can link it from the top of this article. Do we really need a separate disambiguation page? Lusanaherandraton (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

No, you're quite right, we don't. Creating the redirect has caused a load of misdirected internal links to the new dab page rather than to the original cafeteria article. I started fixing them, then engaged my brain properly and realised the only sensible solution was to send the original article back where it came from and disambiguate at the top of the page. I'll sort it out (and undo my dablink "repairs", ho hum). Karenjc 17:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

I've checked with the user who created this page and the dab page at Cafeteria, and he's fine with the proposed move back, so I've requested the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves. --Karenjc 19:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. With two candidates, it's enough to say For the microscopic organism, see Cafeteria (bicosoecid) and Cafeteria roenbergensis. on top of the article. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Moved successfully. I think I fixed most of the links. Kopf1988 (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help :) -- Karenjc 21:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)