WikiProject Geology	(Rated Start-Class)	GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Earth sciences portal v • d • e Anthracite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.  Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.  ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Energy	(Rated Start-Class, Low-importance)	EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Energy portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Version 1.0 Editorial Team     (Rated Start-Class)
	This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Additional information: Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the assessment scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day... section on February 11, 2007 and February 11, 2008.

Have removed the following segment by Virtualsunil as it blatant book plug and has little relevance with respect to this article. Khukri 09:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Virtualsunil I reverted you twice now please, stop this article is about anthracite in general not about indian coal or what specifically happened in 2005. Please create a new article where it can be reviewed for it relevance. Please stop just adding it to this article. Khukri 09:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:3RR

Contents 1 Anthracite Coal Reserves 2 Other places ? 3 In Response to the above 2 inquiries 4 Economic value 5 Anthracite purest coal? 6 COAL IS NOT A MINERAL 7 Clarification Request 8 title 9 production vs extraction? 10 Mercury content 11 Some parts are written strangely 12 Anthracite coal briquettes

[edit] Anthracite Coal Reserves

Is there any information about existing reserves of anthracite coal, today? Based on the means of mining anthracite coal in Pennsylvania (i.e. from mine slag heaps) it might be inferred that there is little coal left in Pennsylvania. Can this be substantiated? L Hamm 16:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other places ?

This article would give the impression that Anthracite is only mined in the US, whereas in 2003 3.1 million short tons were extracted in the UK (http://www.cslforum.org/uk.htm) which is actually more than the US. It might be better to split some of the stuff off to say Pennsylvania Coal Fields and just indicate the reserves and extraction rates from the various sources here.

[edit] In Response to the above 2 inquiries

State records indicate that 2.3 million tons were mined in 2004, this excludes refuse reclamation.

(http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/minres/bmr/annualreport/2004/table07.htm)

Linking page here:

(http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/minres/bmr/annualreport/2004/Anthracite.htm)

One thing to note about refuse reclamation is that it is used almost exclusively in power plants, fresh mined anthracite is used almost exclusively for heating in homes and commercial buildings. If the current state of fuel prices continue you can pretty much bet your last dollar that fresh mined anthracite production will increase, the industry has pretty much been dormant for the last few decades and there was a large surplus the last few years. This is simply not the case now.

Due to the historical impact that Pennsylvania anthracite has had on the US industrial revolution I think that information should stay. One of the reasons so much information is avaialble for Pennsylvania anthracite is because production was so prevalent at the turn of the century, do a search for anthracite and you'll come up with nothing but links for Pennsylvania information.

[edit] Economic value

This section deals solely with the US: the header should be adjusted accordingly. I don't have the knowledge to add info from other parts of the world, sadly. 86.138.104.116 11:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anthracite purest coal?

I thought that graphite is purer, although not commonly used to burn, it is still the purest amongst the coals. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Exodii (talk • contribs) 08:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Anthracite's the purest combustible coal.

[edit] COAL IS NOT A MINERAL

Coal is not mineral. It is organic, or was, and therefore does not fit the defintion of a mineral. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.188.31 (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Clarification Request

• Can someone clarify in the article what is meant by the sentence here: "During the American Civil War, Confederate blockade runners used anthracite to avoid giving away their position to the blockaders."
  
  • Is it just that the anthracite coal since it is clean buring and doesn't make much soot would make the blockader running ships less conspicuous?

[edit] title

This does seem to be only about the USA. could the title be changed to reflect this? Petethewhistle (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

No, but you could add more info to give it a better worldwide view, if it seems too biased right now. 71.207.12.70 (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] production vs extraction?

"Current anthracite production averages around 5 million tons per year."

Is that production of anthracite (a natural process) is around 5 million tons per year, or the mining of anthracite averages around 5 million tons per year?

Welshie (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I think it is supposed to be mine production but that figure is quite wrong anyway - it is not sourced and seems to be someone's guesswork so should be removed. China alone produces about 260 million tonnes of anthracite on top of about 2050 million tonnes of other coals--Mountwolseley (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Mercury content

Is there mercury in anthracite? Badagnani (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Some parts are written strangely

Underground fires "Vents in uninhabited areas remain undiscovered." Really? How would you know? Maybe someone found one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fogus (talk • contribs) 07:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Anthracite coal briquettes

Dear Sir or Madam, where where used anthracite coal briquettes? What tipe of binding substance where usualyy used in the producing of anthracite coal briquettes?

Oleg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.90.4.48 (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)