This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AnaSpec article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish WP:CORP

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Birdy1luv (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. —triwbe (talk) 15:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

The tag for deletion was inappropriate. This company has been cited (as referenced) in independent articles through respected scientific journals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Birdy1luv (talk • contribs) 15:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

That is not the notability requirement for companies. The guideline requires "significant coverage." UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)