| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Sustainable Beds, Organic, Natural & Sustainable Furniture buildingforhealth.com | Motivation - Project Partnerships for sustainable development motivation.org.uk | Systems Approach to Sustainable Energy Solutions cfpa.com |
Strategies and techniques for achieving sustainability in fisheries combine theoretical disciplines, such as the population dynamics of fisheries, with practical strategies, such as avoiding overfishing through techniques such as individual fishing quotas, curtailing destructive and illegal fishing practices by lobbying for appropriate conservation law and policy, setting up protected areas, restoring collapsed fisheries through skilful interventions, recognition of the real economics involved in harvesting marine ecosystems, educating stakeholders and the wider public, and developing independent certification programs for sustainable fisheries. The concern about sustainability in fisheries is not so much that important fish species will be fished to extinction, but rather that heavy fishing pressures, such as overexploitation and growth or recruitment overfishing, will result in the loss of significant potential yield; that stock components will erode to the point where the stock structure loses diversity and resilience to environmental fluctuations; that ecosystems and their economic infrastructures will cycle between periods of rebuilding, losing productivity during each cycle; and that changes will occur in the trophic balance within ecosystems ("fishing down the web").[1] [edit] OverviewThis article is concerned, not so much with documenting the many unsustainable and destructive fishing practices, but with documenting the views of some fisheries scientists and marine conservationists about what is possible in the direction of sustainable fisheries. While fishery ecosystems, on the face of it, are just a subset of the wider marine environment, the fisheries scientists, Daniel Pauly and Dave Preikshot, comment:
[edit] Traditional management of fisheriesTraditionally, fisheries management, and the science underpinning it, focused on the population dynamics of single commercial fish species, and ignored the wider ecosystem complexities associated with the species, as well as the underlying conservation issues.[2] Historically, fisheries stock assessment scientists usually worked in government laboratories and considered their work was in the service of the fishing industry. In this way, these scientists dismissed conservation issues and distanced themselves from the scientists and the science that raised the issues. This happened, even though many commercial fish stocks seriously deteriorated, and even though many governments were signaturies to binding agreements to conserve marine biodiversity.[2] According to Daniel Pauly and Dave Preikshot, this traditional attitude towards conservation was based on two pathologies: the first pathology was "the narrow focus on target populations and the corresponding failure to account for ecosystem effects leading to declines of species abundance and diversity", and the second pathology was perceiving the fishing industry as "the sole legitimate user, in effect the owner, of marine living resources."[2] [edit] Defining sustainabilityThe notion of sustainable development is sometimes regarded as an unattainable, even illogical notion because development inevitably depletes and degrades the environment.[3] Ray Hilborn, of the University of Washington, distinguishes three ways of defining a sustainable fishery.
[edit] Protecting biodiversity
At the Fourth World Fisheries Congress in 2004, Daniel Pauly asked, "How can fisheries science and conservation biology achieve a reconciliation?", and answered his own question, "By accepting each other’s essentials: that fishing should remain a viable occupation; and that aquatic ecosystems and their biodiversity are allowed to persist."[4] [edit] Social sustainabilityThe fisheries and aquaculture sectors are, directly or indirectly, a source of livelihood for over 500 million people, mostly in developing countries.[5] While it is important to protect biodiversity, people also need seafood to ensure food security.[6] Taking account of social sustainability can conflict with the need to protect biodiversity. A fishery is socially sustainable if the fishery ecosystem maintains the ability to deliver products the social system can use. From the social point of view, major species shifts within the ecosystem could be acceptable as long as the new species can be properly utilised.[1] There is nothing new in this; humans have been operating such regimes for thousands of years, transforming many ecosystem, species of which have been depleted or driven to extinction.[7] According to Hilborn, the "loss of some species, and indeed transformation of the ecosystem is not incompatible with sustainable harvests."[1] For example, in recent years, barndoor skates have been caught as bycatch in the western Atlantic. Their numbers have severely declined and they will probably go extinct if these catch rates continue.[8] Even if the barndoor skate goes extinct, and even if there is a consequent change in the ecosystem, there could still be long term sustainable fishing of the commercially important species.[1]
[edit] OverfishingSee also: Overfishing There is a misconception that overfishing is always unsustainable. According to Hilborn, overfishing can be "a misallocation of societies resources", but it does not necessarily threaten conservation or sustainability.[1]" Overfishing is traditionally defined as fishing so hard that the yield from a stock is less that it would be if the fishing pressure were reduced.[1] For example, Pacific salmon are usually managed by trying to determine how many spawning salmon are needed each generation to produce the maximum harvestable surplus. The number allowed to spawn is called the escapement. The optimum escapement is the escapement needed to produce the maximum harvestable surplus. For optimal management, the number of spawners each year is the optimum escapement. If the fishery was managed so the escapement was only half the optimum, then overfishing will occur, because the harvest would be smaller than it need be. But this is still sustainable fishing, which could continue indefinitely at its reduced stock numbers and yield. There is a wide range of escapement sizes that present no threat that the stock might collapse or that the stock structure might erode.[1] On the other hand, overfishing can be a predecessor to severe stock depletion and fishery collapse.[9] Hilborn points out that this syndrome, of continuing to exert fishing pressure while biological production decreases, leading eventually to stock collapse and failure of the fishery, is largely "the product of institutional failure."[1] [edit] Incidental catchMain article: Incidental catch [edit] Shifting environmental baselines[edit] Habitat modificationEcosystem change due to human interference. Nearly all the world’s continental shelves, and large areas of continental slopes, underwater ridges, and seamounts, have had heavy bottom trawls and dredges repeatedly dragged over their surfaces. For fifty years, governments and organizations, such as the Asian Development Bank, have encouraged fishing industries to develop trawler fleets. Repeated bottom trawling and dredging literally flattens diversity in the benthic habitat, and the associated communities are radically changed.[10] [edit] Changing the ecosystem balanceFishing down the marine web. Since 1950, 90 percent of 25 species of big predator fish have gone.
[edit] Climate change Fishing with a lift net in Bangladesh. Coastal fishing communities in Bangladesh are vulnerable to flooding from sea-level rises.[11] Main article: Fisheries and climate change Rising ocean temperatures[12] and ocean acidification[13] are radically altering aquatic ecosystems. Climate change is modifying fish distribution[14] and the productivity of marine and freshwater species. This has impacts on the sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture, on the livelihoods of the communities that depend on fisheries, and on the ability of the oceans to capture and store carbon (biological pump). The effect of sea level rise means that coastal fishing communities are in the front line of climate change, while changing rainfall patterns and water use impact on inland (freshwater) fisheries and aquaculture. [edit] Ocean pollutionMain article: Marine pollution A recent survey of global ocean health concluded that all parts of the ocean have been impacted by the human species, and that 41 percent of the oceans has been fouled with human polluted runoff, overfishing, and other abuses.[16] Pollution is a problem which is not easy to fix, because the sources of pollution are so dispersed, and are built into the economic systems we depend on.
[edit] Diseases and toxinsIs eating fish necessarily better than eating other food? Large predator fish contain significant amounts of mercury, a neurotoxin which can affect foetal development, memory, the mental ability to focus, and give tremors. [edit] Fisheries managementFisheries management draws on fisheries science in order to find ways to protect fishery resources so sustainable exploitation is possible. Modern fisheries management is often referred to as a governmental system of appropriate management rules based on defined objectives and a mix of management means to implement the rules, which are put in place by a system of monitoring control and surveillance.
The American economist Paul Romer believes sustainable growth is possible providing the right ideas (technology) are combined with the right rules. He believes that rather than hectoring people about our predicament, we should think our way out of it by finding the right creative ideas, and coupling them with appropriate rules governing the way the ideas are implemented. There has been no lack of innovative ideas about how to harvest fish. He characterises the failures of fisheries management as primarily failures to apply appropriate rules.[17][18]
Government subsidies operate in many of the world fisheries. Subsidisies on the the costs of operating fishing vessels allow European and Asian fishing fleets to fish in distant waters, such as West African waters. Many fisheries experts believe fishing subsidies should be eliminated and that fishing incentives should be restructured globally to help struggling fisheries recover.[19]
Another focus of conservationists is on curtailing human activities that are detrimental to either marine ecosystems or species through policy, techniques such as fishing quotas, like those set up by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, or laws such as those listed below. Recognizing the economics involved in human use of marine ecosystems is key, as is education of the public about conservation issues.
A promising direction is the independent certification programs for sustainable fisheries conducted by organisations such as the Marine Stewardship Council and Friend of the Sea. These programs work at raising consumer awareness and insight into the nature of their seafood purchases
[edit] Need for adequate dataOne of the major impediments to the rational control of marine resources is a deficiency of data. According to fisheries scientist Milo Adkison (2007), the primary limitation in fisheries management decisions is the absence of quality data. Fisheries management decisions are often based on population models, but the models need quality data to be effective. Scientists and fishery managers would be better served with simpler modelling analyses and improved data.[20] [edit] Marine protected areasMain article: Marine protected areas Strategies and techniques for marine conservation tend to combine theoretical disciplines, such as population biology, with practical conservation strategies, such as setting up protected areas, as with marine protected areas (MPAs) or Voluntary Marine Conservation Areas. Marine life is not evenly distributed in the oceans. Most of the really valuable ecosystems inhabit relatively shallow coastal waters, above or near the continental shelf, where the sunlit waters are often nutrient rich from land runoff or upwellings at the continental edge, allowing photosynthesis to take place. In the 1970s, for reasons more to do with drilling for oil than with fishing, the U.S. extended their national jurisdiction, which was out to 12 miles from the coast, to 200 miles. This made huge areas of continental shelf part of their national territory. Other nations immediately did the same, extending national controls to what became known as the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). This move has had many implications for fisheries conservation, since it means that large areas of the world's most productive maritime ecosystems are now under national jurisdictions, opening possibilities for protecting these ecosystems by passing appropriate national laws. Daniel Pauly characterises marine protected areas as "a conservation tool of revolutionary importance that is being incorporated into the fisheries mainstream."[2] The Pew Charitable Trusts have funded various initiatives aimed at encouraging the development of MPAs and other ocean conservation measures.[21]
[edit] Ecosystem based fisheriesAccording to marine ecologist Chris Frid, the fishing industry has been keen to identify pollution and global warming as the causes of unprecedented low fish levels in recent years. But it is clear that overfishing has also altered the way the ecosystem works. "Everybody would like to see the rebuilding of fish stocks and this can only be achieved if we understand all of the influences, human and natural, on fish dynamics.” Frid adds: “Fish communities can be altered in a number of ways, for example they can decrease if particular sized individuals of a species are targeted, as this affects predator and prey dynamics. Fishing, however, is not the sole perpetrator of changes to marine life - pollution is another example [...] No one factor operates in isolation and components of the ecosystem respond differently to each individual factor."[22] The traditional approach to fisheries science and management has been to focus on a single species. This can be contrasted with the ecosystem-based approach. Ecosystem-based fishery concepts have existed for some years and have been implemented in some regions. In a recent (2007) effort to "stimulate much needed discussion" and "clarify the essential components" of ecosystem-based fisheries science, a group of scientists have offered the following ten commandments for ecosystem-based fisheries scientists[23]
[edit] Fish farmingSee also: Salmon farming issues To what extent can farmed fish be part of the answer? Farmed salmon, eat three pounds of wild fish to produce one pound of salmon.
[edit] Laws and treatiesInternational laws and treaties related to marine conservation include the 1966 Convention on Fishing and Conservation of Living Resources of the High Seas. United States laws related to marine conservation include the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act, as well as the 1972 Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act which established the National Marine Sanctuaries program. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. [edit] Organizations and educationThere are organizations throughout the world that focus on promoting strategies for sustainable fishing, educating the public and stakeholders, and lobbying for conservation law and policy. Examples of these organizations are the Marine Conservation Biology Institute (United States),Blue Frontier Campaign (United States), Frontier (the Society for Environmental Exploration) (United Kingdom), Marine Conservation Society (United Kingdom), Australian Marine Conservation Society, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Langkawi Declaration, Oceana, PROFISH, and the Sea Around Us Project. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers, World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers, Frozen at Sea Fillets Association, CEDO The United Nations Millennium Development Goals include, as goal #7: target 2, the intention to "reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss", including improving fisheries management to reduce depletion of fish stocks.[24][25] Some organisation offer sustainable or good practice certification to fishing industry players, such as the Marine Stewardship Council and Friend of the Sea. There are also organisations which offer advice to those members of the public who want to choose the seafood they eat with an eye to sustainability. According to the marine conservation biologist Callum Roberts, there are four things to look for when choosing seafood:[26]
The following organisations have links where wallet-sized cards, listing best choices and species to avoid, can be downloaded:
[edit] Postscript
[edit] See also
[edit] Notes
[edit] References
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |