| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
Keen Kid's Shoes - Keen healthyshoestore.com | Keen Kid's Trail Walking Shoes - Keen healthyfeetstore.com | About Steve and Biometric Massage | Steve Dollahite, LMP, Bellevue, WA massage4me.net | Holistic Centre Godalming - Prue Keen holisticcentre.co.uk |
Steve Keen is an Associate Professor in economics and finance at the University of Western Sydney. He identifies as post-Keynesian, criticizing both modern neoclassical economics and (some of) Marxian economics as inconsistent, unscientific and empirically unsupported. The major influences on Keen's thinking about economics include Hyman Minsky, Piero Sraffa and Joseph Alois Schumpeter. His recent work mostly concentrates on mathematical modeling and simulation of financial instability. His work has received more interest recently because of his correct prediction of the 2008 financial crisis[citation needed].
[edit] Financial instability and debt deflationMost of the recent work of Steve Keen focuses on modeling Hyman Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis.[1][2] The hypothesis predicts that the too big debt to GDP ratio can cause deflation and depression. Steve Keen argues that the current global economic crisis is the result of too much debt. In the recent year, Dr Steve Keen has commentated about the current economic down-turn in the Australian media.[3] [edit] Debunking EconomicsKeen's full-range critique of neoclassical economics is contained in his book Debunking Economics [4]. Keen collects and popularizes a wide variety of critiques of numerous aspects of neoclassical economic theory and argues that together they show that neoclassical assumptions are simply flawed. Keen points out that several neoclassical assumptions are empirically unsupported (that is, they evade reality) nor are they desirable (that is, they do not necessarily produce either efficiency or equity reasons). He argues that economists' overall conclusions are very senstive to small changes in these assumptions. Keen's book closes with a survey of various schools of heterodox economics, concluding "None of these is at present strong enough or complete enough to declare itself a contender for the title of ‘the’ economic theory of the 21st century." However, he argues that neoclassical economics is a degenerative research program, not generating new knowledge but growing a belt of protective auxiliary hypotheses to shield its core beliefs from critique. Debunking economics is written for a lay audience, but with an accompanying web site which provides more detailed mathematical expositions. [edit] Critique of neoclassical theory of the firmKeen's work (as opposed to his popularization) has also focused on refuting the neoclassical theory of the firm, which argues that firms will set marginal revenue equal to marginal cost. Keen notes that empirical research finds real firms set price well above marginal cost: they charge a markup, often cost-plus pricing. He cites Eiteman & Guthrie,[5] finding 89% of firms set prices above the level where marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost, as well as more recent work by Alan Blinder.[6] [edit] CriticismsSome reviewers contend that Keen has not shown what he claims and that he misrepresents economic theory.[7] Keen agrees that some more nuanced and qualified versions of neoclassical economics exist at very high levels. However he claims that his critique is aimed at the core neoclassical ideas that are taught in universities at undergraduate and postgraduate level and which are often used as the basis for policy prescriptions. Some claim that the empirical evidence that Keen uses to argue against the claim that firms set marginal revenue to marginal cost is not inconsistent with the neoclassical theory of the firm [8] if those firms have some market power. However, Keen argues[9] that economic theory neglects the effect on price of increasing or reducing supply by a single item and finds that charging a markup is actually a more stable, profitable equilibrium. [edit] Other publications
[edit] See also[edit] References
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |