| advertise add site services publishers database health videos | ![]() | about toolbar stats live show health store more stuff JOIN/LOGIN |
For other uses, see Right to life (disambiguation). Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union affirms the right to life. Right to life is a phrase that describes the belief that a human being has an essential right to live, particularly that a human being has the right not to be killed by another human being. The concept of a right to life is central to debates on the issues of capital punishment, euthanasia, self defense, abortion and war.
[edit] Juridical rhetoric
[edit] Abortion debate rhetoricThe term "right to life" is a rhetorical device used in the abortion debate by anti-abortion proponents.[2] Anti-Abortion advocates argue that embryos, zygotes and fetuses are unborn human beings who have the same fundamental "right to life" as that of a human being after birth. Generally speaking, those identifying themselves as "right-to-life" are strongly opposed to abortion. The term "right to choice" is a rhetorical device used in the abortion debate by abortion proponents. Abortion rights advocates argue that embryos, zygotes and fetuses are only potential human beings who do not have the same fundamental "right to life" as that of a human being after birth the distinction is that a human being becomes a person and given rights at birth. Generally speaking, those identifying themselves as "right-to-choice" are strong advocates for free and legal abortion. [edit] Ethics and right to lifeSee also: Abortion debate , Ethical aspects of abortion , and Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate Many utilitarian ethicists argue that the "right to life," where it exists, depends on conditions other than membership of the human species. The philosopher Peter Singer is a notable proponent of this argument. For Singer, the right to life is grounded in the ability to plan and anticipate one's future. This extends the concept to animals, such as apes, but since the unborn, infants and severely disabled people lack this, he states that abortion, painless infanticide and euthanasia can be "justified" (but are not obligatory) in certain special circumstances, for instance in the case of severely disabled infants whose life would cause suffering both to themselves and to their parents.[3] [edit] See also
[edit] References
[edit] External links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ↑ top of page ↑ | about thumbshots |